Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Atera Logo

Top 10 Atera Alternatives

Vendor: Atera
4.6 out of 5
Start review

Top Atera Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Atera based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include ServiceNow, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and BigFix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Atera Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Atera, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Atera Logo
ServiceNow
4.3 out of 5
Atera Logo
ServiceNow
4.3 out of 5
ServiceNow offers a customizable platform with robust ITSM and workflow automation suited for complex enterprises. In comparison, Atera provides efficient remote access tools ideal for MSPs and SMBs, integrating well with cloud services. ServiceNow is feature-rich but pricey, while Atera is competitively affordable.
Download Atera vs. ServiceNow Report
ServiceNow's setup cost is higher due to its extensive customization features, while Atera offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it accessible for smaller businesses seeking essential services without the need for complex configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow's setup cost is higher due to its extensive customization features, while Atera offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it accessible for smaller businesses seeking essential services without the need for complex configurations.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers comprehensive enterprise management, excelling in OS deployment and software distribution. In comparison, Atera provides robust remote access and ticketing for MSPs. Tech buyers choose SCCM for extensive features while opting for Atera for affordability and flexibility.
Download Atera vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant initial setup cost, while Atera offers a lower initial cost, making it more budget-friendly for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant initial setup cost, while Atera offers a lower initial cost, making it more budget-friendly for smaller businesses.
Atera Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Atera Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in advanced security features, while Atera offers comprehensive remote monitoring and management. In comparison, BigFix's deployment can be complex; Atera’s setup is intuitive. BigFix has higher setup costs, whereas Atera provides predictable pricing, appealing to tech buyers seeking cost-efficiency.
Download Atera vs. BigFix Report
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Atera Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Atera Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in device management efficiency with robust mobile app features and automated management options, appealing to enterprises seeking integration. In comparison, Atera's strengths lie in pricing and automation, making it ideal for startups or businesses with fluctuating IT demands.
Download Atera vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne offers a higher setup cost focused on advanced features, while Atera provides a more affordable option with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a higher setup cost focused on advanced features, while Atera provides a more affordable option with essential functionalities.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
JIRA Service Management
4.1 out of 5
JIRA Service Management attracts tech buyers with its extensive integration options and project management tools that cater to large-scale operations. In comparison, Atera appeals with its device-agnostic pricing and strong remote access capabilities, ideal for flexible remote monitoring without complex licensing.
Download Atera vs. JIRA Service Management Report
JIRA Service Management entails higher setup costs compared to Atera, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
JIRA Service Management entails higher setup costs compared to Atera, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Atera Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Atera Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA is known for its advanced remote control, automation, and patch management capabilities. In comparison, Atera integrates RMM, PSA, and remote access. Kaseya VSA's strong customer support contrasts with Atera’s simple setup, making each suitable for different needs.
Download Atera vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA requires a significant initial investment for setup while Atera offers a more cost-effective setup process. Kaseya VSA's higher cost can be attributed to its extensive features compared to Atera's simpler configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA requires a significant initial investment for setup while Atera offers a more cost-effective setup process. Kaseya VSA's higher cost can be attributed to its extensive features compared to Atera's simpler configuration.
Atera Logo
Zendesk
4.1 out of 5
Atera Logo
Zendesk
4.1 out of 5
Atera offers robust PowerShell capabilities and efficient client management with strong automation. In comparison, Zendesk excels in customizable ticket management and multi-channel support. A tech buyer might choose Atera for cost-effective IT solutions and Zendesk for comprehensive customer interactions.
Download Atera vs. Zendesk Report
Atera requires no upfront setup cost, while Zendesk has varying setup fees based on service levels. These cost differences might influence initial budget planning.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera requires no upfront setup cost, while Zendesk has varying setup fees based on service levels. These cost differences might influence initial budget planning.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus offers extensive ITIL integration, versatile workflows, and asset management, ideal for comprehensive IT service management. In comparison, Atera provides strong RMM functions, competitive pricing, and simplified IT tasks, appealing to MSPs seeking efficient remote management and automation.
Download Atera vs. ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Report
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus requires a one-time setup fee, while Atera provides a setup-free experience, highlighting a key cost difference between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus requires a one-time setup fee, while Atera provides a setup-free experience, highlighting a key cost difference between the two platforms.
Atera Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
Atera Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
Freshservice excels in incident and asset management with a mobile-friendly interface. In comparison, Atera emphasizes remote management and automation across platforms. Tech buyers might choose Freshservice for integration capabilities, while Atera appeals for its efficient IT support in mixed environments.
Download Atera vs. Freshservice Report
Freshservice has a lower setup cost compared to Atera, making it a more cost-effective solution for companies prioritizing budget-conscious initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Freshservice has a lower setup cost compared to Atera, making it a more cost-effective solution for companies prioritizing budget-conscious initial implementation.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance is ideal for thorough asset and service desk management across multiple devices and locations. In comparison, Atera offers simplicity with flexible automation, integration, and competitive pricing per technician, appealing to businesses seeking scalability and efficient remote monitoring solutions.
Download Atera vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a substantial setup cost compared to Atera, which has minimal or no setup fees, resulting in a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a substantial setup cost compared to Atera, which has minimal or no setup fees, resulting in a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers extensive reporting and automated deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Atera integrates RMM, PSA, and patch management, appealing to those seeking an all-in-one tool. ManageEngine is more affordable, while Atera justifies its higher cost with comprehensive features.
Download Atera vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus has high initial setup costs, while Atera offers a more budget-friendly setup. Patch Manager Plus provides extensive features at a premium price, in contrast to Atera's cost-effective, simpler configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus has high initial setup costs, while Atera offers a more budget-friendly setup. Patch Manager Plus provides extensive features at a premium price, in contrast to Atera's cost-effective, simpler configuration.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is favored for managing large-scale updates efficiently. In comparison, Atera excels in offering extensive features like integrated remote monitoring and management tools. While Microsoft Windows Server Update Services has a complex deployment, Atera is simpler. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is cost-effective initially, while Atera provides better ROI.
Download Atera vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services has no setup cost, whereas Atera incurs a minimal setup cost. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services predominantly serves enterprise needs, while Atera targets managed service providers with an all-in-one solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services has no setup cost, whereas Atera incurs a minimal setup cost. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services predominantly serves enterprise needs, while Atera targets managed service providers with an all-in-one solution.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
ConnectWise Automate
3.7 out of 5
ConnectWise Automate appeals to tech buyers needing robust automation and complex customization. In comparison, Atera offers ease and cost-efficiency, attracting those favoring simplicity and rapid deployment, despite fewer features. Atera's transparent pricing suits small businesses seeking quick ROI, while ConnectWise Automate requires more initial investment.
Download Atera vs. ConnectWise Automate Report
ConnectWise Automate requires a higher setup cost, while Atera offers lower initial expenses, highlighting their different financial commitments for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise Automate requires a higher setup cost, while Atera offers lower initial expenses, highlighting their different financial commitments for implementation.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management
3.9 out of 5
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management provides strong automation tools and scalability for large enterprises. In comparison, Atera's cloud-based solution with intuitive design offers seamless integration and is attractive for small to medium businesses seeking an all-in-one platform with transparent pricing and comprehensive features.
Download Atera vs. Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Report
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Atera Logo
N-able N-central
4.4 out of 5
Atera Logo
N-able N-central
4.4 out of 5
N-able N-central offers advanced features for enterprises requiring detailed control and customization. In comparison, Atera provides a streamlined, all-in-one solution appealing to smaller businesses with its simplicity and cost-effective pricing, emphasizing ease of use and efficient deployment.
Download Atera vs. N-able N-central Report
N-able N-central includes setup costs, while Atera offers a zero-cost setup, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able N-central includes setup costs, while Atera offers a zero-cost setup, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.6 out of 5
Atera excels in remote management and automation, ideal for operational efficiency and cost-saving scalability for startups. In comparison, Qualys offers comprehensive cybersecurity management and asset visibility, making it suitable for larger enterprises prioritizing extensive security coverage with detailed vulnerability reports.
Download Atera vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Atera's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, whereas Qualys involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a cost disparity between simplicity and comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, whereas Qualys involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a cost disparity between simplicity and comprehensive features.
Atera Logo
LogMeIn Central
4.3 out of 5
Atera Logo
LogMeIn Central
4.3 out of 5
LogMeIn Central appeals to security-focused businesses with its advanced security features, while Atera provides an all-in-one solution for streamlined IT management. In comparison, Atera's cost-effective model offers flexibility, whereas LogMeIn Central's robust security requires a higher initial investment.
Download Atera vs. LogMeIn Central Report
LogMeIn Central typically involves a higher setup cost, while Atera offers a budget-friendly structure with no setup fees, distinguishing itself as a more economical choice.
View comparison
Pricing
LogMeIn Central typically involves a higher setup cost, while Atera offers a budget-friendly structure with no setup fees, distinguishing itself as a more economical choice.
Atera Logo
Atera Logo
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management
4.1 out of 5
N-able N-sight excels with comprehensive remote monitoring and automation tools, ideal for thorough service management. In comparison, Atera's all-in-one simplicity and affordable pricing appeal to small to midsize businesses seeking quick deployment and integrated solutions for effective budget management.
Download Atera vs. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Report
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management presents a varied setup cost, while Atera offers a straightforward billing approach, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management presents a varied setup cost, while Atera offers a straightforward billing approach, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements.
Atera Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.0 out of 5
Atera Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.0 out of 5
ConnectWise RMM appeals to large organizations for its scalable integration capabilities. In comparison, Atera is preferred by SMBs for its transparent pricing and simplicity. ConnectWise RMM’s advanced features attract complex IT operations, whereas Atera’s all-in-one model suits small teams requiring efficiency.
Download Atera vs. ConnectWise RMM Report
ConnectWise RMM has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise RMM has a higher setup cost compared to Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Atera Logo
SuperOps.ai
3.5 out of 5
Atera Logo
SuperOps.ai
3.5 out of 5

SuperOps.ai enhances efficiency in IT management with features like streamlined ticketing, automation, and asset tracking. Some users note the need for improved integrations with third-party tools and faster customer support, indicating room for enhancement in these areas to better meet diverse IT demands.

It is affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
It is affordable.
Atera Logo
Comodo RMM
3.8 out of 5
Atera Logo
Comodo RMM
3.8 out of 5
Comodo RMM appeals with robust security features and flexible pricing, ideal for budget-conscious organizations prioritizing threat management. In comparison, Atera, offering integrated IT automation and billing, suits businesses seeking a comprehensive IT management solution with quick cloud-based deployment and high perceived ROI.
Download Atera vs. Comodo RMM Report
Comodo RMM requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Atera offers a straightforward setup with no upfront fees, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Comodo RMM requires a substantial initial setup cost, while Atera offers a straightforward setup with no upfront fees, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Atera Logo
Action1
1 out of 5
Atera Logo
Action1
1 out of 5

Action1 enhances IT asset management with remote monitoring, cybersecurity compliance, patch management, software deployment, and real-time inventory. Users value its intuitive dashboard, robust automation, seamless remote access, integration, and security features. However, concerns include technical glitches, slow speed, inadequate support, steep learning curve, and limited customization options.

View comparison

Related categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
IT Service Management (ITSM)
Patch Management