Atera vs SuperOps.ai comparison

Atera and SuperOps.ai are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Atera is ranked #4 with an average rating of 10.0, while SuperOps.ai is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. Atera holds a 7.5% mindshare in RMM, compared to SuperOps.ai’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SuperOps.ai users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

2,174 Views
1,478 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SuperOps.ai

Read 1 SuperOps.ai review

585 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

SuperOps.ai

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atera and SuperOps.ai based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya, NinjaOne, N-able and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM).

To learn more, read our detailed Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

4th

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (12th)

SuperOps.ai

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

11th

Ranking in Patch Management

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 7.5%, down from 14.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SuperOps.ai is 3.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Atera	7.5%
SuperOps.ai	3.8%
Other	88.7%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Avi Vaserman

Owner at Sytex Ltd.

Quick setup and efficient automation boost IT consulting services

It would be beneficial if Atera implemented telephone support for general questions. When onboarding new clients and creating their portal, it would be helpful if presidents or company owners could see the current configuration progress step-by-step, rather than relying solely on email and ticket systems. The task system for technicians could be improved by adding recurring task capabilities. This would allow technicians to have checkmarks and task lists they can mark off as completed. While scalability meets growing needs, there haven't been many additions in the last two years. They are adding new features gradually, but there is always room for improvement.

Read full review

Pradip Dey

Chief Solution Architect at Express Systems Limited (ESL)

Monitoring tool, user-friendly and interactive but experienced an issue with integration

The most valuable thing is that we can integrate any other solutions with SuperOps. Like, SuperOps is a monitoring tool, but for security, for backup, we can integrate with other solutions providers as well. I like the PSA tool. It is very user-friendly and interactive with the customer as well. We can, the customer, give feedback directly to the solution. There is no need for another communication channel, like a different email from Outlook or any other tool. From the same solution, we could communicate with the customer, and the customer could reply. So, it includes a collaboration tool with the customer. It could immediately pop up any problem that's at the customer end or in the end devices. Sometimes, it happens that we come to know about an incident negatively, but the monitoring tool gave me the information immediately.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"I would say it's the number one tool for all ITMS."

"We value the alerts that come with the product which allow me to reach out to my clients. Overall, Atera generates additional revenue streams for work done on their machines."

More Atera pros

"The customer service and support are very good."

Cons

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"I also use Apple Zoho, which does not require you to download anything. You can get help from Zoho. Atera, on the other hand, requires you to download an applet."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products. In North America, there are a lot of resellers, like Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Arrow Electronics, etc. It would be amazing if Atera could integrate with these products. If they could integrate with these products for MSPs, it would be much easier. Then, if you are buying something, and need to add something, you don't need to jump from place to place because this is a very quick sales instrument for use on a daily basis."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

More Atera cons

"I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"Atera's pricing stays fixed and predictable, enabling us to add more customers and unlimited monitored devices. We still have a number of clients who fit a break/fix IT model. This is something where clients are complaining more about having to pay extra month-by-month for technology services. With Atera's model, we don't have to be going out and asking for more from clients each month. Right now, with where we are at in terms of scale, this is very important to us."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"It is affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

17%

Performing Arts

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

We use it for maintenance support, patch management, the ticket system, ticketing, and automation in general. Atera enables us to take control quickly with different options. We can perform registr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SuperOps.ai?

I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. It is affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SuperOps.ai?

I have more experience with integration. So, as an integrator, I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero. Though we did solve it, if I could know the reason behind it,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SuperOps.ai?

We use RMM tool to monitor our endpoints and their security and the health of the endpoints. And it works fine.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 21% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 14% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

Action1 vs Atera

Compared 5% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 48% of the time

NinjaOne vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 19% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 8% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 8% of the time

More SuperOps.ai Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

September 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

August 2025

Download SuperOps.ai product report

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

SuperOps.ai offers an IT management platform catering to the demands of modern IT organizations, streamlining operations with its efficient tools and functionalities.

SuperOps.ai is designed to enhance operational efficiency for IT teams by providing an integrated suite of tools focused on automation, monitoring, and service management. It helps users manage IT assets, automate repetitive tasks, and streamline service desk operations. Its intuitive interface and robust functionality meet the needs of IT professionals seeking to improve workflow and productivity. Room for improvement includes expanding customization options to better align with user preferences.

What are the standout features of SuperOps.ai?

Integrated IT Asset Management: Centralizes asset information for easy access and management.
Service Desk Automation: Simplifies ticket handling with automated workflows and notifications.
Remote Monitoring: Allows proactive monitoring of systems to ensure optimal performance.
User Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and project collaboration.

What ROI can users expect when using SuperOps.ai?

Increased Efficiency: Automated workflows reduce manual intervention, saving time.
Improved Asset Visibility: Centralized asset data aids in making informed decisions.
Higher Productivity: Streamlined processes enhance team output.
Enhanced Monitoring: Early detection of issues prevents potential downtime.

SuperOps.ai is implemented across industries such as IT services, consulting, and various sectors needing robust IT management. By catering to specific industry needs, it provides professionals with tailored tools to resolve IT challenges effectively.

SuperOps.ai

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya, NinjaOne, N-able and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM). Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors and best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.