Top 10 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

25 reviews
95% willing to recommend

Top Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat detection, automated incident response, and advanced analytics, ensuring businesses can proactively mitigate risks and protect their digital assets with seamless integration and easy deployment solutions.

Kaspersky Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaspersky, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time threat analysis and AI-enhanced detection, ideal for enterprises needing extensive security features. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers cost-effective threat hunting, suitable for smaller budgets with strong local support.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes the latter more cost-effective in terms of initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes the latter more cost-effective in terms of initial expenses.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in support and ease of use with automated threat detection and intuitive threat hunting. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced investigation features and strong incident response tools, making it a powerful alternative for comprehensive endpoint detection.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher initial setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky's setup is simpler and less expensive, making it more accessible for smaller businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR offers comprehensive threat detection and integrates well with Palo Alto networks. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides efficient threat hunting and incident investigation. Cortex XDR is seen as easier to deploy and offers better support, while Kaspersky's pricing is more cost-effective.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a high setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more affordable setup. Kaspersky is more cost-effective, but Cortex XDR involves initial high expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix excels in centralized management, offering seamless integration and scalable protection. In comparison, Kaspersky is praised for efficient threat response, with effective daily scanning and remote isolation. Trellix's ROI benefits contrast Kaspersky's economical pricing, providing distinct advantages depending on organizational priorities.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is known for higher setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which is favored for its cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is known for higher setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which is favored for its cost-effective setup.

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security excels in cost-effectiveness and customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced threat management and superior incident response tools. A tech buyer might choose Symantec for budget-friendly security or Kaspersky for cutting-edge threat protection.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

4.1 out of 5

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

4.1 out of 5

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust malware protection and is cost-effective with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides advanced threat detection and detailed analytics. ESET meets budget-friendly needs, while Kaspersky caters to complex security requirements.

Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report

Pricing

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.

Microsoft Defender for Business

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Business

3.9 out of 5

Kaspersky provides robust security with threat hunting and powerful analytics, ideal for organizations needing comprehensive endpoint management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, offering strong protection for small businesses through AI-driven threat detection.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.

Bitdefender Total Security

4.4 out of 5

Bitdefender Total Security

4.4 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security provides extensive features, including privacy tools and device optimization. Users favor Kaspersky for its straightforward deployment and supportive customer service, while Bitdefender's robust feature set justifies its higher cost.

Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a straightforward setup process with affordable initial costs, while Bitdefender Total Security offers slightly higher setup costs but includes more comprehensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Seqrite Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Seqrite Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Seqrite Endpoint Security offers real-time threat monitoring and comprehensive reporting, making it cost-effective with quicker ROI. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum excels in threat intelligence integration and automated response, providing robust protection worth its higher cost for advanced capabilities.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Seqrite Endpoint Security has a simpler setup process, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum incurs higher initial costs but offers more advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Seqrite Endpoint Security has a simpler setup process, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum incurs higher initial costs but offers more advanced features.

GravityZone Business Security

4.3 out of 5

GravityZone Business Security

4.3 out of 5

GravityZone Business Security offers lower pricing and centralized management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides automated response capabilities and detailed incident reporting. GravityZone focuses on easy deployment, while Kaspersky emphasizes advanced threat detection for combating complex security threats.

Download GravityZone Business Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report

Pricing

GravityZone Business Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

GravityZone Business Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.

Show 5 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Threat Intelligence Platforms