Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Kaspersky and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.8, while Seqrite is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5. Kaspersky holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum compete in the endpoint security category. While Seqrite is valued for affordability, Kaspersky takes the upper hand for advanced detection and threat analysis.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security excels in asset management, quick scanning, and offers features like DLP, USB blocking, and web filtering. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is recognized for advanced detection capabilities, behavior analysis, and effective automated threat responses.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite struggles with ransomware detection, stability, and support responsiveness, especially on Apple devices, and needs better integration and user management. Kaspersky requires improvements in central management, integration capabilities, and can be optimized to reduce system weight, with interface and support response time also needing enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Seqrite and Kaspersky offer flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud solutions. Seqrite's customer service is mixed, with local call center support, whereas Kaspersky provides a robust online platform with generally competent support.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite is generally more affordable and attractive to small and medium enterprises, providing significant savings. Kaspersky, while more expensive, offers good value with its advanced features and threat intelligence, and is justified for larger deployments seeking comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum	1.0%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	94.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Nadeem Syed

CEO at Haniya Technologies

Continuous protection has improved automated threat response and reporting for our endpoints

We did work with one of our clients who required mobile security solutions. In my opinion, Trend Micro, when we went through the POCs and other components, we did not find it very strong as far as mobile security is concerned. I think Kaspersky is much better than Trend Micro when it comes to mobile security solutions. From an outside perspective, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum looks pretty strong and comprehensive. The main improvement would be if they could decrease the cost, as it would be great for clients since it is quite expensive now compared to when it used to be cheaper. The key competitor for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is Trend Micro. Trend Micro is the only competitor in the market right now. I would say both Trend Micro Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are quite similar; I cannot say that one is better than the other. The difference is mainly in cost; Trend Micro has mostly moved all their products to the cloud, offering no on-premises products now, whereas Kaspersky is still in a transition phase providing both on-premises and cloud solutions. Many clients prefer on-premises as it is less expensive compared to cloud.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the things that I enjoy the most is using policy extensions. It's like having host firewalls to control USB connections. I think it's a wonderful tool to restrict use when connecting to our computers. Another important tool is Home Insights. That is an add-on to the Cortex solution. I like that because we can see all the vulnerabilities in the environment and control what assets are connected to our network."

"I can highlight that we have not faced any security incidents with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and even though our environment is quite dynamic, we have not faced any security incident with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks until now."

"The solution allows us to gain remote access without the user's knowledge and take the necessary actions on the device."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"It is easy to use."

"My advice for anybody who is considering Cortex XDR is that it is a complete solution, and has very good features."

"If any application performs suspicious activities, such as changing registries or modifying other applications, Cortex XDR detects and blocks the entire application."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It protects against malware and secures the network."

"They provide integrated protections and prevention with multi-layered anti-malware, which makes clients want to go for it."

"The product is lightweight and does not slow down the PC. The malware and virus detection rate is also very good."

"Instead of having to wait for alerts, the IT security team can actively hunt for threats by proactively scanning endpoints to spot anomalies and security breaches."

"It offers features like system hardening, vulnerability management, patch management, and device control, which are not present in other solutions."

"It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks."

"The solution is very user friendly, which we appreciate."

"The network discovery tools they have make deployment easier, and even without an Active Directory or an RMM tool, you can still deploy Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum quite easily compared to other solutions."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum pros

"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"The most valuable features are the file activity monitors, DLP solutions, and application controls."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"In case it works, we are looking to use features like USB blocking, file upload alerts, and other antivirus features as well, but this software has to work first."

"I like Seqrite's web protection features and external device control."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Enhancing UI simplicity and playbook flexibility are areas that could benefit from more low-code automation options for smoother integrations."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is not only pricey; it is extremely expensive."

"The deployment is pretty hard."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"For Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, if I had to point out improvements, I would say the UI is still somewhat difficult for beginners."

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"The only issues that we have are, one the cost, two the dashboard is not very intuitive, even though you can drill down within the dashboard, we usually have to gather information from other sources to determine locations and if its a false positive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"For improvement, they should make the scanning process faster. The scanning and updating take more time."

"From an outside perspective, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum looks pretty strong and comprehensive. The main improvement would be if they could decrease the cost, as it would be great for clients since it is quite expensive now compared to when it used to be cheaper."

"I want Kaspersky to extend its products to internet protection. For example, I would like them to develop a firewall integrated with EDR."

"Scalability depends on various factors."

"The central management needs improvement. The ease of use for updating and managing through the web console is difficult and lacks features."

"The solution needs to give more control to users on firewalls."

"The application should be made a bit lighter so that it does not slow down the PC."

"We are switching solutions because we have had issues with updating it."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum cons

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks."

"The cost of the solution can be improved."

"We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns."

"When we fire any employee connected remotely over the internet, we need a security feature that blocks the system and the device."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"Deployment of Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally straightforward. The only complexity we encounter is that, since it is cloud-based, there can be delays in updating the endpoint's status."

"When it comes to the support provided by the product, I see that Seqrite is not as mature as the other products in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"Very costly product."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"This is an expensive solution."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."

"Kaspersky gives a consolidated price with a good solution. If we choose something else, we need to add other options on our own."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually."

"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."

"The tool’s pricing is yearly. The solution’s pricing is expensive."

"The price is good, not too high."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum pricing and cost advice

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market. I do not know the exact cost o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

We did work with one of our clients who required mobile security solutions. In my opinion, Trend Micro, when we went ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

When it comes to endpoint security requirements, we work with Trend Micro most of the time; currently, my focus is mo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Next MXDR Optimum vs Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum

May 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

May 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides swift threat detection and response, enhancing device and vulnerability management via an intuitive dashboard.

With features like automated threat detection, advanced encryption, and centralized reporting, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum elevates security management. Its cloud console supports incident analysis, while behavior analysis and machine learning offer robust network insights. Despite integration challenges with firewalls and setup complexities, it ensures endpoint protection through features like malware detection and zero-day attack monitoring, proven valuable in medium to small business environments.

What are the key features?

Automated Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning for efficient threat identification.
Advanced Dashboard: Simplifies management of devices and vulnerabilities.
Centralized Reporting: Consolidates data for enhanced visibility.
Cloud Console: Facilitates real-time incident analysis.
Zero-Day Attack Monitoring: Proactively addresses emerging threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Security Features: Ensures robust endpoint protection.
Real-Time Network Insights: Boosts situational awareness and response.
Scalable Programs: Allows growth and adaptation to increased needs.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing tools to maximize efficiency.

Implementation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum in industries often focuses on protecting devices like laptops and servers against threats such as malware, utilizing features like USB protection and endpoint encryption. Organizations also leverage centralized management and patch management for improved efficiency and effectiveness.

Kaspersky

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.