CrowdStrike Falcon and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are renowned solutions for endpoint protection. CrowdStrike Falcon appears to have the upper hand due to its performance, reliability, and ease of deployment.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon includes effective malware detection, lightweight agent, and real-time response capabilities. Kaspersky offers in-depth threat intelligence, sandboxing, and extensive reporting features.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike could enhance its integration options and documentation clarity. Kaspersky could reduce system impact and simplify configuration processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike is noted for its straightforward cloud deployment and responsive support team. Kaspersky’s deployment can be more complex, and users report mixed experiences with customer support.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike is generally perceived as more costly but justified by its performance and efficiency gains. Kaspersky’s pricing is seen as more competitive, though users acknowledge its higher system resource demands. CrowdStrike offers faster ROI through reduced response times and improved security posture, whereas Kaspersky's value proposition hinges on its extensive features and detailed threat reports.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
I have observed value for money from Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is scalable for my environment.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions.
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
Threat Response Automation in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is quite effective for enhancing security.
It monitors vulnerabilities and takes action, such as blocking USB or devices from the network, to avoid vulnerabilities or ransomware.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.
CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?
What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.