No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo

Top 10 Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Alternatives

Vendor: Dell Technologies
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud, and Rubrik. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines surpasses its competitors by providing continuous data protection with advanced replication capabilities, ensuring minimal downtime and rapid recovery for virtual environments.

Dell Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Dell Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers granular replication and continuous protection, suitable for minimizing downtime. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform stands out for its extensive backup options and scalability. Dell’s competitive pricing attracts cost-conscious buyers, while Veeam’s comprehensive features ensure long-term value.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves moderate setup costs, while Veeam Data Platform presents higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves moderate setup costs, while Veeam Data Platform presents higher upfront expenses.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
Commvault Cloud offers seamless management across hybrid environments and comprehensive features, making it ideal for diverse cloud integrations. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides precise data protection and recovery, appealing to VMware-focused deployments. Commvault suits flexibility, while Dell excels in precision.
Download Commvault Cloud vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
Commvault Cloud offers a higher setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting the cost disparity in initial pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Commvault Cloud offers a higher setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting the cost disparity in initial pricing between the two solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Rubrik
4.5 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Rubrik
4.5 out of 5
Rubrik excels in instant recovery, cloud capabilities, and ease of deployment, appealing to those valuing policy management and customer service. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines focuses on real-time data protection and precise recovery, prioritizing continuous replication and VMware integration.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Rubrik Report
Rubrik's setup cost is straightforward and competitive, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves more complicated initial expenses. This distinction highlights Rubrik's cost-effectiveness compared to the more complex pricing structure of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines.
View comparison
Pricing
Rubrik's setup cost is straightforward and competitive, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves more complicated initial expenses. This distinction highlights Rubrik's cost-effectiveness compared to the more complex pricing structure of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
HPE Zerto Software
4.5 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
HPE Zerto Software
4.5 out of 5
HPE Zerto Software is favored for its ease of use and quick recovery, making it ideal for businesses with limited IT resources. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint offers extensive data recovery features and wide storage compatibility, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive protection despite higher complexity.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software Report
HPE Zerto Software offers a straightforward setup at a slightly higher cost, whereas Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines requires more complex implementation, potentially increasing initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE Zerto Software offers a straightforward setup at a slightly higher cost, whereas Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines requires more complex implementation, potentially increasing initial expenses.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
BDRShield
4.1 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
BDRShield
4.1 out of 5
BDRShield provides ease of use and cost-effective backup features, attracting SMBs with flexible configurations. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels in real-time data protection, appealing to enterprises with its focus on precision recovery and robust integration with VMware.
Download BDRShield vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
BDRShield has a lower setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, allowing businesses to reduce initial investment. Dell RecoverPoint provides a comprehensive solution, potentially justifying its higher setup costs for robust data protection.
View comparison
Pricing
BDRShield has a lower setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, allowing businesses to reduce initial investment. Dell RecoverPoint provides a comprehensive solution, potentially justifying its higher setup costs for robust data protection.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Nasuni
4.4 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Nasuni
4.4 out of 5
Nasuni offers features like global file locking and unlimited storage, ideal for users prioritizing data accessibility and management. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines emphasizes real-time data protection, suitable for those focusing on VMware environment disaster recovery.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nasuni Report
Nasuni's setup cost involves a streamlined process, minimizing upfront investment, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines may entail a more structured setup with possibly higher initial costs, indicating potential differences in their initial deployment cost strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Nasuni's setup cost involves a streamlined process, minimizing upfront investment, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines may entail a more structured setup with possibly higher initial costs, indicating potential differences in their initial deployment cost strategies.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
VMware Live Recovery
4.0 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Live Recovery provides advanced features and granular recovery, drawing enterprises focused on rapid data restoration despite the higher initial investment.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs a higher setup cost, while VMware Live Recovery offers a more economical setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs a higher setup cost, while VMware Live Recovery offers a more economical setup process.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform
4.4 out of 5
CTERA Enterprise prioritizes cloud-enabled collaboration and file sharing, ideal for teams seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint emphasizes advanced data protection and recovery for virtual environments, appealing to buyers needing robust, high-investment, continuous data protection to prevent data loss.
Download CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform offers a cost-effective setup, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a more complex and higher initial cost, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform offers a cost-effective setup, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a more complex and higher initial cost, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
4.7 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint emphasizes robust replication, ideal for enterprises needing detailed disaster recovery, whereas NAKIVO offers cost-effective solutions with flexible backup options. In comparison, NAKIVO's cloud accessibility and user-friendly interface attract smaller businesses, while Dell's technical support benefits enterprises seeking advanced replication capabilities.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines generally involves a higher initial setup cost, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a more budget-friendly setup. Dell's robust features contrast with NAKIVO's streamlined approach, catering to different budget preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines generally involves a higher initial setup cost, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a more budget-friendly setup. Dell's robust features contrast with NAKIVO's streamlined approach, catering to different budget preferences.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
N2W
4.8 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
N2W
4.8 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is ideal for businesses needing enterprise-grade replication and robust support. In comparison, N2W offers comprehensive cloud-native protection for AWS, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing cloud integration and flexibility, despite potentially higher initial costs.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. N2W Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has higher setup costs, with users citing complexity, while N2W is noted for lower initial expenses and straightforward implementation, appealing to businesses seeking budget-friendly recovery options.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has higher setup costs, with users citing complexity, while N2W is noted for lower initial expenses and straightforward implementation, appealing to businesses seeking budget-friendly recovery options.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
4.0 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, with its continuous data protection, appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking reliable support and minimal data loss. In comparison, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery attracts those valuing superior automation and scalability, favoring businesses with complex setups needing advanced capabilities.
Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves considerable setup costs, whereas AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers a straightforward, lower-cost setup. Users must weigh the established infrastructure costs against AWS’s more streamlined approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves considerable setup costs, whereas AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers a straightforward, lower-cost setup. Users must weigh the established infrastructure costs against AWS’s more streamlined approach.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels in advanced data protection and rapid recovery, catering to enterprises with minimal data loss needs. In comparison, MSP360 Backup attracts attention with its flexible cloud integrations and cost-effective solutions, ideal for smaller businesses requiring versatile recovery options.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. MSP360 Backup Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a more complex setup, potentially increasing initial costs, while MSP360 Backup presents a streamlined and cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a more complex setup, potentially increasing initial costs, while MSP360 Backup presents a streamlined and cost-effective setup process.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
4.6 out of 5
Infrascale provides ease of use, flexibility, and Critical Server Insurance. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines focuses on real-time data protection and robust features. A tech buyer may choose Infrascale for cost-effectiveness or Dell for comprehensive data protection.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Report
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers a straightforward, lower setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, which has a more complex and higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers a straightforward, lower setup cost compared to Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, which has a more complex and higher initial setup expense.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
QoreStor
4.1 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
QoreStor
4.1 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines emphasizes robust data protection and disaster recovery, ideal for environments needing strong replication features. In comparison, QoreStor focuses on efficient storage management, appealing to tech buyers seeking data optimization and significant long-term savings through effective deduplication.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. QoreStor Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs higher setup costs compared to QoreStor, which offers a more affordable installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs higher setup costs compared to QoreStor, which offers a more affordable installation.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Quorum OnQ
4.5 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Quorum OnQ
4.5 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels in precision with its continuous data protection and recovery features, making it ideal for detailed environments. In comparison, Quorum OnQ emphasizes speed and automation, appealing to businesses needing rapid recovery with comprehensive support across varied environments.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Quorum OnQ Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs a high setup cost compared to Quorum OnQ, which offers more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs a high setup cost compared to Quorum OnQ, which offers more budget-friendly implementation.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
NetVault Plus
3.7 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
NetVault Plus
3.7 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides rapid data recovery and easy deployment, ideal for those seeking quick integration. In comparison, NetVault Plus attracts users needing comprehensive features and broad compatibility, offering extensive platform support and long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. NetVault Plus Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines features a straightforward setup with minimal cost implications, whereas NetVault Plus requires a more intricate initial configuration with associated costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines features a straightforward setup with minimal cost implications, whereas NetVault Plus requires a more intricate initial configuration with associated costs.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Druva Phoenix
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Druva Phoenix
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels with high-availability features in virtual settings. In comparison, Druva Phoenix offers simplified management through its cloud-native approach. Dell provides robust recovery options, while Druva's cloud integration ensures adaptability.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Druva Phoenix Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher setup cost, while Druva Phoenix offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher setup cost, while Druva Phoenix offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Datto Cloud Continuity
4.0 out of 5
Datto Cloud Continuity offers agile backup solutions with minimal downtime, appealing to businesses seeking simplicity. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides advanced replication and disaster recovery tools, suitable for organizations requiring detailed control and customization in complex virtualization environments.
Download Datto Cloud Continuity vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
Datto Cloud Continuity has a straightforward setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines presents a more complex pricing model. This difference highlights the simplicity of Datto Cloud Continuity versus the intricacy of Dell's solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Cloud Continuity has a straightforward setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines presents a more complex pricing model. This difference highlights the simplicity of Datto Cloud Continuity versus the intricacy of Dell's solution.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Datto SIRIS
4.5 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Datto SIRIS
4.5 out of 5
Datto SIRIS is used by organizations for business continuity and disaster recovery, offering rapid restoration, SaaS backup for M365 with user-based permissions, and seamless integration with physical and cloud systems. Instant virtualization reduces downtime, while Hero Reports and Inverse Chain Technology enhance continuity and protection. Improvements needed in Mac OS backup, initial sync, and documentation.
Download Datto SIRIS vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
View comparison
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
NovaStor NovaBACKUP
4.7 out of 5
NovaStor NovaBACKUP appeals to businesses seeking cost-effective, user-friendly backup solutions with efficient recovery options. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines caters to enterprises needing advanced data protection and integration, offering robust functionality despite higher costs.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP Report
NovaStor NovaBACKUP entails a moderate setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher upfront expenditure, signifying a substantial difference in initial investment requirements between these two data protection solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NovaStor NovaBACKUP entails a moderate setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher upfront expenditure, signifying a substantial difference in initial investment requirements between these two data protection solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Veritas System Recovery
3.9 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines emphasizes minimizing data loss with competitive pricing and robust support, attracting buyers needing affordability and replication. In comparison, Veritas System Recovery offers comprehensive recovery and user-friendly deployment, appealing to those valuing extensive features despite higher costs.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Veritas System Recovery Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive disaster recovery features, while Veritas System Recovery presents a more cost-effective setup option with straightforward recovery solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive disaster recovery features, while Veritas System Recovery presents a more cost-effective setup option with straightforward recovery solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Precisely Assure MIMIX
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels in disaster recovery for virtual infrastructures with granular RPOs and seamless VMware integration. In comparison, Precisely Assure MIMIX is preferred for high availability and data continuity across platforms, offering extensive customer support for complex cross-platform deployments.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Precisely Assure MIMIX Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher setup cost compared to Precisely Assure MIMIX, making Dell more suitable for enterprises with larger budgets while Precisely Assure MIMIX caters to organizations with cost-effective deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a higher setup cost compared to Precisely Assure MIMIX, making Dell more suitable for enterprises with larger budgets while Precisely Assure MIMIX caters to organizations with cost-effective deployment needs.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Precisely Assure QuickEDD
4.3 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines excels in continuous data protection, appealing to businesses prioritizing robust data resilience. In comparison, Precisely Assure QuickEDD offers real-time replication, making it ideal for mission-critical environments needing swift deployment and high availability despite a higher initial setup cost.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a more complex setup cost compared to the more straightforward setup cost of Precisely Assure QuickEDD, highlighting significant differences in initial investment and implementation requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has a more complex setup cost compared to the more straightforward setup cost of Precisely Assure QuickEDD, highlighting significant differences in initial investment and implementation requirements.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Acronis Disaster Recovery
4.1 out of 5
Acronis Disaster Recovery appeals with its simplicity and cloud integration, ideal for straightforward setups. In comparison, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines caters to businesses desiring advanced features like continuous data protection, justifying its higher cost through robust capabilities and extensive support resources.
Download Acronis Disaster Recovery vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Report
Acronis Disaster Recovery presents a competitive setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines features a higher setup cost, highlighting a key financial consideration for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Acronis Disaster Recovery presents a competitive setup cost, while Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines features a higher setup cost, highlighting a key financial consideration for potential users.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Nutanix Disaster Recovery
4.4 out of 5
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines emphasizes reliability and flexibility in data management. In comparison, Nutanix Disaster Recovery excels in automation and simplicity, offering faster deployment. Buyers may prefer Dell for lower costs, while Nutanix attracts with quicker ROI and integrated disaster recovery features.
Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery Report
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a complex setup process with higher initial costs, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery offers a simpler setup with relatively lower costs, highlighting the significant difference in ease and affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines involves a complex setup process with higher initial costs, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery offers a simpler setup with relatively lower costs, highlighting the significant difference in ease and affordability between the two solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
IBM Disaster Recovery Manager
1 out of 5
IBM Disaster Recovery Manager enables effective data protection and recovery, catering to diverse business needs. Users appreciate its automation and flexibility, though some suggest streamlining onboarding processes. Enhanced reporting capabilities and support options are recommended for better performance and user experience.
View comparison

Related categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Backup and Recovery
Cloud Backup