The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive.
Licensing is easy.
The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive.
Licensing is easy.
There are three levels of pricing: basic, plus, and apex. Basic satisfied our needs.
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
There are three levels of pricing: basic, plus, and apex. Basic satisfied our needs.
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
It IS a bit expensive, but I think you get what you pay for. Value is there.
It's not particularly cheap, but it is absolutely worth it.
It IS a bit expensive, but I think you get what you pay for. Value is there.
It's not particularly cheap, but it is absolutely worth it.
SailPoint IIQ is the best of best. That is reflected in the pricing of the solution. The pricing is based on the number of identities.
They are expensive.
SailPoint IIQ is the best of best. That is reflected in the pricing of the solution. The pricing is based on the number of identities.
They are expensive.
License is around US$20,000 annually.
It is costly for large companies.
License is around US$20,000 annually.
It is costly for large companies.
The licensing model is very straightforward, it's a bit pricey, but for what you get, it's well worth it.
If you can afford it, go for a small Check Point, as it is easier to manage.
The licensing model is very straightforward, it's a bit pricey, but for what you get, it's well worth it.
If you can afford it, go for a small Check Point, as it is easier to manage.
I would start off with a VM including the base license and scale according to the number of users you need to authenticate.
You can pay as you go with them. You purchase a base license and add to it as needed.
I would start off with a VM including the base license and scale according to the number of users you need to authenticate.
You can pay as you go with them. You purchase a base license and add to it as needed.
The pricing is too high for SMBs.
Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product.
The pricing is too high for SMBs.
Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product.
There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month.
It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry.
There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month.
It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry.
It isn't terribly expensive.
The price of this solution is good.
It isn't terribly expensive.
The price of this solution is good.
If you need to make any changes then there are additional fees.
The price of the license for this product is quite expensive.
If you need to make any changes then there are additional fees.
The price of the license for this product is quite expensive.
It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive.
Its price is comparable to other products in the market.
It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive.
Its price is comparable to other products in the market.
It is a very good product but it's not the cheapest or cost-efficient.
There are old processes that are really great for some people and look like pieces of artwork. However, the maintenance of them is really expensive.
It is a very good product but it's not the cheapest or cost-efficient.
There are old processes that are really great for some people and look like pieces of artwork. However, the maintenance of them is really expensive.
licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record.
I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved.
licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record.
I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved.
I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features.
RSA SecurID Access is expensive.
I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features.
RSA SecurID Access is expensive.
Free works unless the paid is absolutely necessary.
The more users, the better the price. Always opt for the live support.
Free works unless the paid is absolutely necessary.
The more users, the better the price. Always opt for the live support.
The cost was around $300,000.
The price of Digital Guardian is expensive.
The cost was around $300,000.
The price of Digital Guardian is expensive.
I'm sure everyone should have the cluster environment, which means more expensive, anyway, cheaper than the other solutions.
PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version.
I'm sure everyone should have the cluster environment, which means more expensive, anyway, cheaper than the other solutions.
PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version.
Recently, they have simplified the licensing
The product is very expensive.
Recently, they have simplified the licensing
The product is very expensive.
PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools.
PingID's pricing is pretty competitive.
PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools.
PingID's pricing is pretty competitive.
Its price is lower compared to similar solutions.
We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing.
Its price is lower compared to similar solutions.
We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing.
Pricing of this solution is good for the local market and is more affordable than CyberArk, BeyondTrust and One Identity.
The solution's price is mid-ranged.
Pricing of this solution is good for the local market and is more affordable than CyberArk, BeyondTrust and One Identity.
The solution's price is mid-ranged.
Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.
The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.
Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.
The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.
Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget.
The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive.
Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget.
The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive.
The licensing cost varies depending on the specific requirements and deployment size.
The licensing cost varies depending on the specific requirements and deployment size.
The licensing cost for this solution is based on the number of endpoints.
The price is pretty expensive, but you get what you pay for and this is a great product.
The licensing cost for this solution is based on the number of endpoints.
The price is pretty expensive, but you get what you pay for and this is a great product.
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.
The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market.
CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big.
The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market.
The pricing of this solution is good compared to other solutions on the market.
The pricing is bad so I rate it a two out of ten.
The pricing of this solution is good compared to other solutions on the market.
The pricing is bad so I rate it a two out of ten.
We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market.
There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed.
We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market.
There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed.
Pricing is low and licensing is flexible.
Pricing is reasonable.
Pricing is low and licensing is flexible.
Pricing is reasonable.
You just need to be aware that the more systems you connect, the more license fees you have to pay.
The price of the solution is a bit high and could be reduced.
You just need to be aware that the more systems you connect, the more license fees you have to pay.
The price of the solution is a bit high and could be reduced.
I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides.
The solution is cost-effective.
I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides.
The solution is cost-effective.
Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.
Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.
It is sad that people with a limited budget won't be able to afford it.
The price model is based on the number of devices and opposed to the number of users, and it is not very flexible.
It is sad that people with a limited budget won't be able to afford it.
The price model is based on the number of devices and opposed to the number of users, and it is not very flexible.
We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers.
I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others.
We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers.
I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others.
The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution.
Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market.
The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution.
Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market.
I would rate the price eight out of 10, with 10 as the best value for money.
I would rate the price eight out of 10, with 10 as the best value for money.
The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution.
The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution.
I believe that we paid 35,000 or 40,000 US dollars for it.
My rating for the IBM Security Secret Server pricing is seven out of ten. It could be cheaper.
I believe that we paid 35,000 or 40,000 US dollars for it.
My rating for the IBM Security Secret Server pricing is seven out of ten. It could be cheaper.
The pricing of Check Point Infinity could be better. There is a license needed to use the solution and we pay annually.
The product has good pricing considering the features and a global approach.
The pricing of Check Point Infinity could be better. There is a license needed to use the solution and we pay annually.
The product has good pricing considering the features and a global approach.
The solution is free if you don't need customizations but is not expensive otherwise.
The solution is free if you don't need customizations but is not expensive otherwise.
