CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and WALLIX Bastion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion Report (Updated: May 2023).
708,461 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the vault. I am satisfied with the interface and the documentation.""We like it for the ability to automatically change passwords. At least for my group, that's the best thing.""What I found most valuable in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the Session Manager as it allows you to split the connection between the administrator site and the target site. I also found the Password Manager valuable as it lets you rotate the passwords of privileged users.""It's secure and reliable. I especially appreciate that it's locked down and only allows access to authorized components.""The solution helps our developers access internal systems. It also helps us in Privilege Access Management.""The solution is stable.""CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable.""With CyberArk, you can be fully confident that your existing accounts are secure. You will be 100 percent"

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pros →

"WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN.""I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."

More WALLIX Bastion Pros →

Cons
"If there is an area that has room for improvement, it's probably working with their support and getting people on the phone. That is hard to do with most products in general, but that seems to be the difficult area. The product is fantastic, but sometimes we want somebody on the phone.""There is a lot of room for improvement in the report section. I also work on other tools, such as Thycotic, which allows you to create customized reports for your organization's needs. In CyberArk, there are limited reports, whereas in Thycotic or some of the other PAM tools, because the database is different, you can customize the report based on your needs through SQL queries.""The initial setup of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager difficulty depends on the environment that you are implementing it into. However, it typically is simple.""It should be easier to install. It is a comprehensive product, which makes it difficult to install. You need to have their consulting services in order to get it all installed and set up correctly because there is so much going on. It would be nice if there were an easier way to do the installation without professional services. I suspect they get a fair amount of their money from professional services. So, there is not a huge incentive.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""PAM could be more user-friendly and CyberArk could update the documentation to include more real-world examples. You have to learn it yourself through trial and error. In particular, the online documentation should have more information about troubleshooting.""Sometimes the infrastructure team is hesitant to provide more resources.""We would, of course, always prefer it if the pricing was cheaper."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Cons →

"The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low.""It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."

More WALLIX Bastion Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of CyberArk support could be a little bit less. Otherwise, pricing is fine."
  • "Before we bought it, they were licensing each function individually, which got complicated and very expensive. When we decided to buy it, it was much more straightforward and still quite expensive, but it brings a lot of value and risk reduction to the organization."
  • "It is in line with its competitors, but all such solutions cost too much money."
  • "CyberArk DNA is free if you purchase the CyberArk solution. There is no additional charge for CyberArk DNA, which is great."
  • "The main problem for the tool is its licensing. I work for a really big company. When you try to develop this as a service, usually you work with leverage teams who are formed with dozens of members. You might dedicate one FTE, or less, for something, e.g., an antivirus administrator. You might have half an FTE's effort dedicated to administering the antivirus, but then you have a team of about 30 users who might access that ticket. The problem is that CyberArk eliminated the possibility of concurrent users years ago. This is a big problem for companies who work with leverage teams. You need to pay for everyone. 40 licenses are used by 20 or 30 people. This is a big problem because licenses are not precisely cheap."
  • "It's expensive, certainly. But CyberArk is the leader in the market with regards to privileged access management. You pay a lot, but you are paying for the value that is being delivered."
  • "Previously, the pricing was very meager. They started publicizing and advertising the solution, growing CyberArk, as an organization. They also changed their pricing with that growth, e.g., the pricier the product, the more people who will purchase it."
  • "Generally, I don't get involved in the licensing or the purchasing side of it, but I do know that the licenses are expensive."
  • More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    708,461 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is privileged threat analytics.
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is reasonable. I rate the price CyberArk Privileged Access Manager a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN.
    Top Answer:Setup...its matter of hours...than days. Nothing complex...nearly zero dependency cost and licensing adapts to the requirements
    Top Answer:The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low.
    Ranking
    Views
    32,107
    Comparisons
    19,292
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    938
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    4,846
    Comparisons
    3,051
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    550
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CyberArk Privileged Access Security
    Bastion
    Learn More
    CyberArk
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a next-generation solution that allows users to secure both their applications and their confidential corporate information. It is extremely flexible and can be implemented across a variety of environments. This program runs with equal efficiency in a fully cloud-based, hybrid, or on-premises environment. Users can now protect their critical infrastructure and access it in any way that best meets their needs.

    CyberArk Privileged Access Manager possesses a simplified and unified user interface. Users are able to manage the solution from one place. The UI allows users to view and manage all of the information and controls that administrators need to be able to easily access. Very often, management UIs do not have all of the controls and information streamlined in a single location. This platform provides a level of visibility that ensures users will be able to view all of their system’s most critical information at any time that they wish.

    Benefits of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

    Some of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager’s benefits include:

    • The ability to manage IDs and permissions across a cloud environment. In a world where being able to work remotely is becoming increasingly important, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a very valuable tool. Administrators do not need to worry about infrastructure security when they are away from the office. They can assign and manage security credentials from anywhere in the world.
    • The ability to manage the program from a single centralized UI. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager’s UI contains all of the system controls and information. Users now have the ability to view and use all of their system’s most critical information and controls from one place.
    • The ability to automate user management tasks. Administrators can save valuable time by assigning certain management tasks to be fulfilled by the system itself. Users can now reserve their time for tasks that are most pressing. It can also allow for the system to simplify the management process by having the platform perform the most complex functions.

    Reviews from Real Users

    CyberArk Privileged Access Manager’s software stands out among its competitors for one very fundamental reason. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is an all-in-one solution. Users are given the ability to accomplish with a single platform what might usually only be accomplished with multiple solutions.

    PeerSpot users note the truly all-in-one nature of this solution. Mateusz K., IT Manager at a financial services firm, wrote, "It improves security in our company. We have more than 10,000 accounts that we manage in CyberArk. We use these accounts for SQLs, Windows Server, and Unix. Therefore, keeping these passwords up-to-date in another solution or software would be impossible. Now, we have some sort of a platform to manage passwords, distribute the inflow, and manage IT teams as well as making regular changes to it according to the internal security policies in our bank."

    Hichem T.-B., CDO & Co-Founder at ELYTIK, noted that “This is a complete solution that can detect cyber attacks well. I have found the proxy features most valuable for fast password web access.”

    WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

    Offer
    Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
    Learn more about WALLIX Bastion
    Sample Customers
    Rockwell Automation
    RTBF, Pharmagest, Michelin Group, Niort Hospital
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Insurance Company12%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Educational Organization11%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    708,461 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 37 reviews while WALLIX Bastion is ranked 9th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.4, while WALLIX Bastion is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WALLIX Bastion writes "A stable privileged access managed service with an useful secure and seamless access management feature". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Delinea Secret Server, SailPoint IdentityIQ and One Identity Safeguard, whereas WALLIX Bastion is most compared with BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, ManageEngine Password Manager Pro and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion report.

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.