We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature."
"I find value in notifications from CyberArk when passwords fail verification and have other issues."
"The voice technology is very good."
"It is scalable."
"We have been able to manage application credentials in CyberArk, whether they come as a custom plugin or straight out-of-the-box."
"This is a complete solution that can detect cyber attacks well."
"DVR like video recording and text-based recording for easier audits."
"It's secure and reliable. I especially appreciate that it's locked down and only allows access to authorized components."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup has room for improvement to be more straightforward."
"Having a centralized place to manage the solution has been something that I have always wanted, and they are starting to understand that and bring things back together."
"Sometimes the infrastructure team is hesitant to provide more resources."
"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."
"The solution needs better features for end users to manage their own whitelisting for API retrieval."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"The current interface is not very intuitive."
"For users to access a system via CyberArk Privileged Session Manager, a universal connector needs to be coded in a language called AutoIT and its support for web browsers is so-so. Other products like Centrify have browser plugins that can help automate the process when using their products."
"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while senhasegura Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while senhasegura Access Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of senhasegura Access Management writes "With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas senhasegura Access Management is most compared with ManageEngine PAM360.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.