We compared CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Teleport based on our user reviews across 4 parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is highly praised for its robust password management capabilities, strong security measures, and positive ROI. Users have noted areas for improvement in user interface and integration. Teleport is lauded for seamless Kubernetes integration and encryption capabilities but needs improvement in connectivity stability and user interface. Customers praise Teleport's affordability and value for cost while also highlighting the platform's positive ROI. Users also appreciate Teleport's customer service for its timely responses and helpful solutions.
Features: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager excels in robust password management, advanced analytics, and comprehensive privilege escalation monitoring. Teleport is praised for its seamless integration with Kubernetes, encryption capabilities, and ease of setting up access controls.
Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager offers competitive pricing with reasonable setup costs and flexible licensing. Teleport provides affordable pricing with minimal setup costs and straightforward licensing terms, making it a cost-effective option for organizations. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager offers a significant increase in security measures and control over sensitive data. Users find it essential for managing privileged access. Teleport is praised for saving time, money, and resources with seamless integration and efficiency in streamlining workflow processes. Users achieve increased productivity and cost savings.
Room for Improvement: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could improve by enhancing the user interface, reporting capabilities, integration with other security tools, and customer support responsiveness. Teleport should focus on improving connectivity stability, user interface clarity, customization options, and customer support efficiency.
Deployment and customer support: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has a more complex and time-consuming initial deployment process, while Teleport offers a quicker and easier setup with clear documentation. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has satisfactory customer support, with some users experiencing slow response times and Tier One support lacking knowledge. Teleport's customer service is highly praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful.
The summary above is based on 40 interviews we conducted recently with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Teleport users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Teleport is ranked 23rd in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Teleport is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Teleport is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and SSH PrivX.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.