Fudo PAM provides an effective solution for managing privileged user access with advanced session recording, password management, and protocol compatibility, ensuring organizations efficiently control server activities.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fudo PAM | 2.3% |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Manager | 10.5% |
| Delinea Secret Server | 4.5% |
| Other | 82.7% |
Fudo PAM offers a flexible, intuitive interface that supports SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols. It's known for its ease of installation and operation, facilitating server activity monitoring and control. However, there are areas for improvement in scaling, session, and password management usability. Users have noted setup complications and a lack of regional support, specifically in Ukraine, eyeing better educational services and an improved account-server matching system. Basic improvements are desired for privileged account search capabilities and the reduction of buggy installations. Primarily used by businesses to secure privileged access, it aids in remote access and password management, serving IT and database administrators, third parties, and clients, while integrators and resellers handle configuration and deployment.
What are the main features of Fudo PAM?Fudo PAM is commonly implemented across industries focusing on securing privileged user access, enhancing remote access management, and maintaining secure, detailed user logs. Businesses use it internally or for clients, while integrators and resellers deploy it for their customers.
Fudo PAM was previously known as Fudo Privileged Access Management.
KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| BDM at Oberig-it | 4.0 | In evaluating Fudo PAM, I find it excels in session recording and password management for privileged access, yet lacks scalability options. While I rate it below Delinea, it still performs effectively alongside competitors like One Identity for remote access management. |
| Security Solutions Architect at Netwave | 3.5 | I work for an IT integrator company as a reseller and find Fudo PAM's server management lacking. The scalability is complex, managing thousands of installations is tough, and better educational programs are needed, unlike Cisco's comprehensive certification offerings. |
| Information Technology Security Specialist at BornaNetworkManagers | 4.0 | I primarily use Fudo PAM for client access management and logging. While it's scalable and I consider it better than WALLIX based on research, its initial setup was buggy, and stability wasn't great during implementation. I rate it an 8/10. |
| IT Specialist at IT Specialist LLC | 4.0 | I find Fudo PAM perfect for controlling our company's computers and user activity, with good dashboards and interface. However, my colleague experienced difficulty with the initial configuration. Overall, I rate it nine out of ten. |
| Lead Systems Architect at IT Specialist LLC | 4.0 | I find Fudo PAM an intuitive, easy-to-install, and stable solution for access management, which I recommend. However, it needs better training, regional support, and improved privileged account search capabilities. I rate it 8/10. |