We compared CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and StrongDM based on our users reviews.
Our conclusion is that both have their strengths and weaknesses: CyberArk is praised for its automation capabilities, compliance features, and secure access management. However, it is considered complex to set up and maintain, lacks intuitive controls, and needs improvement in documentation and support. On the other hand, StrongDM is commended for its ease of deployment, centralized access control, session recording, and multi-factor authentication. It offers a user-friendly interface and helpful support. However, occasional performance issues and desired improvements in documentation, pricing, integration options, and mobile app functionality have been mentioned by some users.
We primarily focused on the topics below:
The summary above is based on 50 interviews we conducted with our users. To access the interviews' full transcripts, download our report.
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while StrongDM is ranked 36th in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while StrongDM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas StrongDM is most compared with .
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.