OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs ProcessMaker comparison

OpenText and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3, while ProcessMaker is ranked #35. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

805 Views
757 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

720 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and ProcessMaker are competing products in the workflow automation space. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is considered superior due to its seamless integration capabilities and advanced data management, though ProcessMaker is recognized for its cost effectiveness.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint's strengths lie in document management, robust security measures, and extensive integration with Microsoft environments. ProcessMaker focuses on ease of use, process automation, and customization, offering greater flexibility and user-friendly process automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers a comprehensive deployment model well-suited for enterprises utilizing Microsoft ecosystems, paired with strong customer support services. ProcessMaker provides rapid deployment with cloud options, prioritizing customer-centric service. ProcessMaker's straightforward setup makes it appealing for small to medium enterprises, while OpenText offers a more tailored approach for larger organizations.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint typically requires a higher initial investment with an extended ROI timeframe, attributed to its broader enterprise capabilities and high customization cost. In contrast, ProcessMaker's lower setup costs and faster ROI make it attractive for companies seeking quick impact solutions. ProcessMaker provides better upfront value, while OpenText offers long-term benefits in a more integrated and customized workflow environment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	0.9%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The overall benefit I get from using this solution is developing in a more secure environment with distributed architecture and even distribution of work across resources where full control on the code and repository is required."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"It has a reasonable price."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 37% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.