Bizagi vs ProcessMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bizagi Logo
6,475 views|5,650 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
ProcessMaker Logo
767 views|495 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bizagi and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard.""This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling.""The approval process is simple.""The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience.""The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects.""The solution offers a free version of their product.""The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations.""The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."

More Bizagi Pros →

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine.""What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros →

Cons
"The open source version lacks the option to publish.""From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better.""In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered.""Difficult to export in formats other than PDF.""I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN.""The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us.""Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it.""Bizagi has been aggressively adding features to maintain its market-leading position, however, in some cases, this has impacted the stability of certain product builds."

More Bizagi Cons →

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects.""Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

More ProcessMaker Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good value for money."
  • "For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."
  • "The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."
  • "It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."
  • "If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."
  • "I think that its price is reasonable."
  • "This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."
  • "The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
  • More Bizagi Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load… more »
    Top Answer:The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    6,475
    Comparisons
    5,650
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    785
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    767
    Comparisons
    495
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Visio logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Bonita logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    ARIS BPA logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Camunda logo
    Compared 35% of the time.
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Bonita logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Also Known As
    ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

    ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

    Sample Customers
    adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
    Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government14%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Bizagi is rated 8.4, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform. See our Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.