Bizagi vs ProcessMaker comparison

Bizagi and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bizagi is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while ProcessMaker is ranked #37. Bizagi holds a 6.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 83 Bizagi reviews

7,231 Views
4,194 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

493 Views
493 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bizagi

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bizagi and ProcessMaker compete in the business process management space. Bizagi has an upper hand due to higher user satisfaction and ease of use, supported by comprehensive features.

Features: Bizagi offers process modeling, automation, execution, integrated tools for collaboration, and analytics. It is recognized for strong process automation and adaptability. ProcessMaker provides workflow automation, form building, and focuses on simplicity and streamlined processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi offers cloud-based deployment enabling rapid scalability and integration, supported by extensive project resources. ProcessMaker supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, with flexibility in infrastructure management, but has less extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi offers a flexible pricing model leading to predictable ROI through increased operational efficiency but may involve higher initial setup costs. ProcessMaker provides simpler pricing with lower initial costs, though long-term ROI can be less predictable.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (4th), Process Automation (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (14th), Low-Code Development Platforms (9th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (6th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.1%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature."

"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."

"Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."

"The most valuable feature is the simulation."

"This is a free solution that allows us to create quality visualizations for our company."

"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."

"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."

"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."

More Bizagi pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"The on-premise software has some bugs."

"There could be more documentation."

"Governance is lacking, as with many easy-to-use tools. The scalability could be improved as well."

"Agriculture, Industry."

"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."

"I would like to see a facility for building a simple CRUD application. In Bizagi, you can use database modeling, diagrams, forms, etc., but in some circumstances I need CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionalities which are not there yet."

"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."

"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."

More Bizagi cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I was using the free version."

"When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"Bizagi is totally free for modeling."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 23% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 20% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 4% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 60% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 16% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

August 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2025

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

No data available

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker

July 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.