Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker comparison

Nintex and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while ProcessMaker is ranked #38. Nintex holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.
Nintex Process Platform
Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews
  • 2,623 Views
  • 1,564 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
ProcessMaker
Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews
  • 489 Views
  • 382 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and ProcessMaker compete in business process management, each with unique advantages. Nintex is more flexible with integrations, while ProcessMaker offers cost-effectiveness and intuitive design.

Features: Nintex Process Platform supports a wide range of automation tools with seamless integration to platforms like Microsoft 365 and Salesforce. It’s ideal for organizations needing strong connectivity. ProcessMaker provides efficient process mapping tools and a low-code development environment. Its focus is on providing accessible and straightforward solutions. Nintex emphasizes integration capabilities, whereas ProcessMaker prioritizes user-friendly functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers cloud-based deployment, simplifying installation with minimal IT needs. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. Nintex offers both cloud and on-premise deployment but may take longer to set up. It has extensive documentation and troubleshooting resources. The ease of cloud deployment is a highlight for ProcessMaker, while Nintex benefits from dual deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform usually involves higher initial costs, focusing on long-term value through integrations and advanced features. ProcessMaker presents a budget-friendly pricing model, enabling faster ROI for organizations. While Nintex justifies its pricing with robust capabilities, ProcessMaker attracts budget-conscious buyers by balancing affordability with essential functionality.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)
ProcessMaker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
38th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye - PeerSpot reviewer
Straightforward interface and user-friendly
There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.
Read full review
UchechiSylvanus - PeerSpot reviewer
Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly
We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think the initial setup is fine."
"The strength of this solution lies in its connectors and the accessibility of an open API. The presence of an open API allows users to create custom connectors if necessary, provided there is access to the source API documentation. Additionally, the platform features a straightforward yet highly effective forms tool. This tool not only seamlessly integrates with the workflow functionality but also facilitates the transmission of information to the document generation tool. This comprehensive integration is particularly noteworthy when compared to alternatives such as Oracle, which tends to rely on more complex and separate logic for similar functionalities. A key strength of Nintex lies in its user-centric approach to help documentation. The materials are designed to be easily understood, avoiding complex terminology. In cases where technical terms are used, they are linked to articles for further clarification. This contrasts with platforms like Microsoft and Oracle, which may employ technical jargon without clear explanations. Nintex further supports its users through a robust online community, fostering collaboration and shared insights. Additionally, Nintex University offers online training across all applications, following a role-based structure. Unlike some other platforms, Nintex's training is thoughtfully broken down into shorter courses, focused on specific roles. This approach ensures that users can efficiently access the information they need without navigating through extensive and potentially irrelevant content, as may be the case with Oracle's training structure."
"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
More Nintex Process Platform pros
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
 

Cons

"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
More Nintex Process Platform cons
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."
"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."
"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."
"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."
"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."
More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice
"We have a yearly license."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
17%
University
10%
Educational Organization
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.
See all answers
What needs improvement with K2?
The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 21% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 7% of the time
More Nintex Process Platform Competitors
Camunda vs ProcessMaker Logo
Camunda vs ProcessMaker
Compared 56% of the time
Bonita vs ProcessMaker Logo
Bonita vs ProcessMaker
Compared 14% of the time
Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker Logo
Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker
Compared 10% of the time
Bizagi vs ProcessMaker Logo
Bizagi vs ProcessMaker
Compared 9% of the time
More ProcessMaker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform
April 2025
Nintex Process Platform reportDownload Nintex Process Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
April 2025
ProcessMaker reportDownload ProcessMaker product report
 

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
 

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?
  • Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
  • Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
  • Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
  • Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
  • Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
  • Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
  • Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
  • Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
  • Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker
 

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker
April 2025
Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.