Camunda vs ProcessMaker comparison

Camunda and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while ProcessMaker is ranked #36. Camunda holds a 16.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
14,910 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

538 Views
538 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Camunda and ProcessMaker are competing in the business process management solutions category, each offering distinct advantages. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its enterprise-level features and robust open-source platform, whereas ProcessMaker offers significant value with its accessibility and adaptability.

Features: Camunda features a powerful BPMN engine, open-source flexibility, and seamless integration options ideal for complex processes. ProcessMaker provides an intuitive drag-and-drop process modeling feature, efficient low-code development capabilities, and comprehensive reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports agile deployment with extensive documentation and community support, which suits tech-savvy teams. ProcessMaker offers streamlined deployment through cloud-based and on-premise options with responsive customer service and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's pricing can be higher, targeting complex needs and larger organizations with tailored ROI. ProcessMaker presents a more affordable setup for small to medium-sized businesses, promising quicker cost recovery and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 16.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.0%
ProcessMaker	0.8%
Other	83.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."

"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

"The best feature is the automation."

More Camunda pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself."

"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."

"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."

"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."

"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."

"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."

"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."

More Camunda cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"The open-source version of the product is free to use."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"We use a community version."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 21% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 19% of the time

Newgen OmniFlow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

October 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

ProcessMaker

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

September 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.