We performed a comparison between Camunda and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform. See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
