We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The product is stable."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"Documentation can be improved."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
