OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Camunda compete in digital transformation and process automation. OpenText 360 for SharePoint has the upper hand in integration and customer support, while Camunda excels in feature set, appealing to technical users despite higher costs.
Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, providing robust document management and collaboration tools. It supports secure workflows and integrates easily with Microsoft Teams. Camunda offers a powerful open-source platform with BPMN-based workflow automation, decision management, and flexible scalability, allowing extensive customization and development by IT teams.
Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 for SharePoint may benefit from enhanced workflow customization options and expanded non-Microsoft integrations. Additionally, improving documentation could aid users in maximizing platform capabilities. Camunda could improve by simplifying initial setup processes, enhancing user-friendliness for non-technical users, and expanding official support for easier integration across more diverse tech environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers straightforward deployment in Microsoft environments and responsive customer service tailored to enterprise needs. Camunda, while requiring a more technical setup, provides comprehensive support resources, including detailed documentation and community forums, appealing to those with technical expertise and customization needs.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint typically involves higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI through streamlined operations and integration. Camunda offers a cost-effective entry due to its open-source model, though customization may increase costs. Despite higher costs, OpenText's integration efficiency justifies the expense, while Camunda offers economic advantages for businesses with technical development capacity.
The return on investment provided by OpenText 360 for SharePoint is excellent, and that is why we are continuing this team for the past 3 years.
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft partners, where organizations receive yearly discounts.
ECS also allows for horizontal scalability with thresholds that can be configured for CPU or memory.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
The metadata can be retrieved from the SharePoint list, and those libraries and metadata serve as a very effective way that I am utilizing SharePoint, apart from just storing documents.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 16.5% |
| OpenText 360 for SharePoint | 0.5% |
| Other | 83.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
