Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.3. Camunda holds a 14.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Camunda
Read 78 Camunda reviews
  • 20,923 Views
  • 14,228 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Read 16 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews
  • 641 Views
  • 583 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and Camunda compete in digital transformation and process automation. OpenText 360 for SharePoint has the upper hand in integration and customer support, while Camunda excels in feature set, appealing to technical users despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, providing robust document management and collaboration tools. It supports secure workflows and integrates easily with Microsoft Teams. Camunda offers a powerful open-source platform with BPMN-based workflow automation, decision management, and flexible scalability, allowing extensive customization and development by IT teams.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 for SharePoint may benefit from enhanced workflow customization options and expanded non-Microsoft integrations. Additionally, improving documentation could aid users in maximizing platform capabilities. Camunda could improve by simplifying initial setup processes, enhancing user-friendliness for non-technical users, and expanding official support for easier integration across more diverse tech environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers straightforward deployment in Microsoft environments and responsive customer service tailored to enterprise needs. Camunda, while requiring a more technical setup, provides comprehensive support resources, including detailed documentation and community forums, appealing to those with technical expertise and customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint typically involves higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI through streamlined operations and integration. Camunda offers a cost-effective entry due to its open-source model, though customization may increase costs. Despite higher costs, OpenText's integration efficiency justifies the expense, while Camunda offers economic advantages for businesses with technical development capacity.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: November 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
November 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Camunda delivers cost-effective, stable solutions enhancing productivity, reducing operational expenses, and offering comprehensive process coverage for large enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.2
Users gain substantial ROI from OpenText 360 for SharePoint through efficient document management and resolving server challenges.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
The return on investment provided by OpenText 360 for SharePoint is excellent, and that is why we are continuing this team for the past 3 years.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Camunda's customer service is praised for helpfulness and expertise, though some mention challenges with complexity and regional support.
Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides praised 24/7 support, offering timely solutions, though complex queries may face slower responses.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They really understand deeply and in detailed fashion the solution.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewerCristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
VN
RS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Camunda excels in scalability using modern tools but faces database challenges; improvements are noted in documentation and setup.
Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is adaptable, with mixed reviews on storage limitations but praised for integration and scalability.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
ECS and Fargate make horizontal scalability very easy.
They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
VN
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewerCristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda is highly rated for stability, with minimal bugs, and performs efficiently in various production environments even under load.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText 360 for SharePoint has mixed stability, with some users experiencing issues, especially with SaaS and integration components.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
We were not really concerned about the performance on the process itself because it was super simple, super straightforward, and it did not present itself as a bottleneck, nor did we feel it was adding additional time in the execution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
 

Room For Improvement

Camunda needs better customization, programming language integration, scalability, and AWS support, with enhanced documentation and performance improvements.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint needs enhancements in user-friendliness, integration, document management, and pricing, with improved interfaces and tools.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
VN
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewerCristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
SB
VW
RS
 

Setup Cost

Camunda's pricing is competitive, but costly for small businesses; enterprise edition offers advanced features and support options.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is costly with complex pricing, but SaaS options and enterprise agreements offer cost efficiency.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft partners, where organizations receive yearly discounts.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
VN
RS
VW
SB
 

Valuable Features

Camunda is valued for its flexibility, open-source customization, user-friendly interface, and effective management of complex processes.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration and document management with customizable features, automation, and improved security for efficient workflows.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
For more quotes and insights, download the Camunda report
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices.
The metadata can be retrieved from the SharePoint list, and those libraries and metadata serve as a very effective way that I am utilizing SharePoint, apart from just storing documents.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText 360 for SharePoint report
FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewerCristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewerMohamed Guermazi - PeerSpot reviewer
RS
VW
SB
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 14.0%, down from 21.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Camunda14.0%
OpenText 360 for SharePoint0.7%
Other85.3%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years
I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.
Read full review
Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise29
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
See all answers
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
See all answers
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
See all answers
What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...
See all answers
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda Logo
Flowable vs Camunda
Compared 11% of the time
Apache Airflow vs Camunda Logo
Apache Airflow vs Camunda
Compared 9% of the time
Temporal vs Camunda Logo
Temporal vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
Bizagi vs Camunda Logo
Bizagi vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
IBM BPM vs Camunda Logo
IBM BPM vs Camunda
Compared 8% of the time
More Camunda Competitors
BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint Logo
BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Compared 33% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Compared 31% of the time
More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Camunda
November 2025
Camunda reportDownload Camunda product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
October 2025
OpenText 360 for SharePoint reportDownload OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report
 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
 

Interactive Demo

Camunda
Demo not available
OpenText
 

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?
  • Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
  • Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
  • Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
  • Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
  • Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
  • Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
  • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
  • Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Buyer's Guide
Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
November 2025
Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.