Appian vs ProcessMaker comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Appian and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Appian is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7, while ProcessMaker is ranked #40. Appian holds a 3.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Appian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Appian and ProcessMaker are competing in the business process management sector. Appian appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced automation tools suitable for complex enterprise processes, while ProcessMaker is favored for lightweight process automation and customization.

Features: Appian provides robust automation tools, advanced AI capabilities, and low-code development tools for large-scale operations. ProcessMaker is distinguished by its ease of use, flexibility in workflow customization, and capability to handle lightweight processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian offers comprehensive deployment options including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, along with extensive training resources. ProcessMaker focuses on swift implementation, with a simplified deployment process and strong customer support for fast turnaround times.

Pricing and ROI: Appian typically involves higher initial costs, which are offset by its scalability and advanced features, providing significant long-term ROI. ProcessMaker offers a more cost-effective setup for smaller budgets, delivering quick ROI through efficient process management.

To learn more, read our detailed Appian vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Appian vs. ProcessMaker

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,022 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Appian is 3.4%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere	0.9%
Appian	3.4%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	94.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

Shad Bhowmik

Finance Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated remittance workflows have boosted speed and accuracy but still need geo-tagging improvements

Remittance is a crucial part of my integral operation, so any disruption would majorly impact our clients. After switching to Appian, we never faced any disruption as it is reliable and we can generate data at any point in time, quite faster than other tools in my personal opinion. Regulators can ask for data from us at any time, and with Appian, we download data from our Appian tools to share it with them whenever they ask. I would share a real-life example: a customer's transaction processed more than a year ago. Suddenly the customer came back asking for all the details. In our previous tool, it was quite difficult to generate transaction details from over a year ago; however, while using Appian, we can pull up data using different key search fields, such as a customer's cell phone number, remittance tracking number, or MT103 reference number. We shared it with the customer instantly, and the customer was surprised we could provide all the details in such a short time. It added reputational value for our organization, thanks to Appian.You have pointed out two major things: time-saving and reduction of error, which are key points while processing remittance. Previously, while using another tool, it was quite time-consuming to process remittance, but after switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry. The process has become fully automated. Previously we could process only five to ten transactions within an hour, but now, after switching to Appian, we can process about 100 transactions in an hour, making it 10 times faster. In terms of error detection, since Appian extracts data from MT103, the extraction rate is quite good, and the error rate is negligible, lower than 0.001%. We can share accurate, error-free data with the regulator, which is essential for us. Appian benefits us significantly. After receiving an MT103, we check what the remitter is, the amount, if it is under threshold for processing, and if it is from a high-priority remitter or client. Since Appian extracts data from MT103 messages and identifies top-level clients from the database, it can notify us to process their transactions with priority. Due to automated data extraction, there are fewer instances of error. In our previous tool, we reported regulatory data to the central bank manually and often received complaints about invalid purpose codes due to manual data entry. Appian handles this automatically, and after switching, our error rate has dropped significantly, resulting in positive feedback from the Central Bank of Bangladesh regarding our reduced error rates. This has greatly enhanced our organization's reputation. Appian is fully on-premises, and we have our own system.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IQ Bot is very helpful as it is easy to learn and implement and the data output accuracy is almost 90%."

"We work on SAP as well as many other internal platforms, and this solution can very easily be moved between them."

"We are making less mistakes and have more metrics available to understand what our problems are. Now, we can do root cause analysis and have less noise in the system during the process."

"During the digital transformation of a company, the number of internal portals and applications increases leading to an increased number of data silos."

"From my perspective, the most valuable features in Automation Anywhere are the ability to connect to different systems of records."

"Using Automation Anywhere saves us time, money, and eliminates errors."

"There are multiple levels of cloning. In case screen cloning doesn't work, you can do object-based cloning or keystroke-level cloning, depending upon what parameters are available to you and what is the level of information that you capture. You can traverse between object cloning, which is the lowest form of cloning to a stroke-based cloning, which is like taking care of each keystroke-level which is made by the agent."

"While our Automation Anywhere's implementation is in a premature stage, it has really decreased the workload on our service desk and we definitely see some ROI in the future from this product."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"Previously we could process only five to ten transactions within an hour, but now, after switching to Appian, we can process about 100 transactions in an hour, making it 10 times faster."

"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."

"Technical support is helpful."

"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."

"Appian had definitely improved the productivity, and functionality of our company."

"Prior to Appian, when we were handling a particular process manually, it took 40 days to resolve, after Appian was implemented, it took only seven days, and the improvement in time is amazing."

"Appian is a stable product and works very well."

"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."

More Appian pros

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

Cons

"Although Automation Anywhere is a GUI-based platform with drag-and-drop functionality, non-technical business users struggle to implement it due to the complexities of operationalizing automation within a business context."

"They are already working on this: The boom of generative AI, the next-gen technologies, including advanced AI and ML technologies, are in the roadmap. I would like to see more and more AI integration and a bit more analytics. That would be great."

"In A2019 it does not display the exact running status, but rather it displays the previous one."

"I would like for AA to add an inbuilt debug log that has functionalities to view the values of variables during run time in order to have a point-to-point debugging in case of an error."

"With the automation copilot, if I have any internal tool or application and I want to pass on variables, I don't have it. Maybe the team can work on it to make it more efficient to make it work better across all automations."

"As a solution, it could have been easier to use than in the current state."

"The IQ Bots need more out-of-the-box models to lessen the time required for model training. Their competitors provide more built-in models, which enhance capabilities in document processing."

"We would like to see more capability for integration and more customization available with some features."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."

"It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem."

"There are four areas I believe Appian could improve in. The first is a seamless contact center integration. Appian does not have a contact center feature. The second is advanced features in RPA. The third would be chatbot and email bot integration—while Appian comes with chatbot and email bot, it's not as mature as it should be, compared to the competition. The fourth area would be next best action, since there is not much of this sort of feature in Appian. These are all features which competitors' products have, and in a mature manner, whereas Appian lacks on these four areas. I see customers who are moving from Appian to Pega because these features are not in Appian."

"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."

"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."

"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved."

"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."

"I'd like to see the ability of the software itself to integrate with the core systems. It's a gap that Appian hasn't fulfilled."

More Appian cons

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not know the price, but I am told that it is cheaper than UiPath."

"As far as costs, it depends on your use. We started with a basic department pack, which is over 10K. The additional costs depend on the scale of the engagement and how it pans out. We customize to our needs on the go."

"It is reasonable and affordable. If you consider the tasks that we can get done using this, the pricing is reasonable and affordable."

"The current pricing for Automation Anywhere seems a little higher compared to competitors Power Automate or UiPath. Automation Anywhere is perceived as pricey due to the support model charges ranging from 20% to 30% based on the plans."

"It's the best RPA tool, but the pricing could be improved."

"The price is a little bit high but the support is good."

"We are interested in saving manual engineer man-hours. So far, we have saved $100,000."

"We paid separately for the Runner and Creater components. The final cost depends on the structure of your environment."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"The solution offers a monthly subscription model. That's what we use. I recall it being about $90 a month. They do have different tiers."

"Appian is very flexible in their pricing. In general, Appian's pricing is much, much lower when compared to competition like Pega or other products. Appian also has a flexible licensing model across geographies. Pega usually goes with a single licensing cost—which is a US-based cost—for all global customers, and it's costly. Whereas Appian has a different regional licensing cost model and it can be cheaper, depending on geography. So Appian's licensing is very flexible, and cheaper when compared to other competition."

"We will have to have a dialogue or negotiate a price for future use. To start with, it is a reasonable price. As we go ahead, we will have to make sure the costs are inline with our expectations as we grow our user base and workloads."

"The licensing will be on a monthly basis. We are estimating that cost to be around $2000 to maybe $3,000 per month. We don't foresee any costs above that."

"When it comes to pricing, it's definitely not affordable. However, it really depends on the requirements that you're seeking from the solution."

"The cost is a bit higher than other low-code competitors, OutSystems and Mendix. The price needs to be more competitive."

"Licensing of Appian is less expensive when compared to other BPMs in the market."

"The license is not very cheap. It's on the expensive side."

More Appian pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	158
Midsize Enterprise	82
Large Enterprise	558

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with...

See all answers

Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?

Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. The...

See all answers

Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?

We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in i...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 12% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Celonis vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Camunda vs Appian

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs Appian

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs Appian

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow vs Appian

Compared 4% of the time

Mendix vs Appian

Compared 2% of the time

More Appian Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 17% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 12% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 8% of the time

Flokzu vs ProcessMaker

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle BPM vs ProcessMaker

Compared 5% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

September 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Appian

September 2026

Download Appian product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Appian

Demo not available

ProcessMaker

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Appian provides AI automation for critical processes. The platform orchestrates AI agents, people, and systems within unified, governed workflows, giving AI the structure, data, and controls required for reliable enterprise value. The result is end-to-end automation that replaces fragmented manual work at scale.

Appian

ProcessMaker is a leading business process management solution that simplifies workflow automation for businesses through advanced process mapping and streamlined execution.

Designed for enhancing efficiency, ProcessMaker enables organizations to automate repetitive tasks, reduce errors, and foster a clear communication pathway. It offers an intuitive drag-and-drop designer, ensuring that users can build comprehensive workflows without extensive programming knowledge. With a strong focus on results, ProcessMaker assists enterprises in achieving operational excellence through a robust platform that adapts to specific business process needs.

What are the key features of ProcessMaker?

Drag-and-Drop Designer: Create workflows with ease using a simple drag-and-drop interface, minimizing the need for coding expertise.
Customizable Dashboards: Users can configure dashboards tailored to provide real-time insights and performance metrics.
Role-Based Access Control: Secure data management with strict permissions and access levels based on user roles.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrate with third-party applications to enhance functionality and data exchange.
Form Builder: Design custom forms to capture necessary information efficiently during process execution.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Automating processes lessens manual workloads, saving time and operational costs.
Improved Productivity: Simplified workflows lead to faster task completion and increased overall productivity.
Reliability: Consistent processes with reduced error rates build trust and reliability within operations.
Scalability: Expand business operations without proportional increases in resources using flexible workflow capabilities.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, ProcessMaker is implemented to enhance process efficiencies and compliance standards. Financial institutions use it to streamline approval workflows, while healthcare providers leverage it to ensure consistent patient care pathways, improving service quality and operational throughput.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Appian vs. ProcessMaker

September 2026

Free Report: Appian vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appian vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.