Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.2, while OpenText is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.8. Nintex holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,673 Views
1,844 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

1,169 Views
877 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Process Automation compete in the workflow automation space. Though both are recognized for their ease of use and integration, OpenText appears superior in feature-rich offerings, particularly in comprehensive business process management across multiple systems, whereas Nintex is noted for its ease of use and robust integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Features: OpenText Process Automation offers scalability, robust performance, and flexible workflow options with extensive integrations, including a seamless SAP connection that doesn't require coding. Nintex stands out for its rapid workflow creation capabilities, SharePoint process automation, and user-friendly drag-and-drop interfaces.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users have expressed a need for enhancements in UI, mobile compatibility, and intuitive management of complex tasks. Nintex users seek better logging, error notifications, and more flexibility in licensing. Both platforms could improve their default templates and reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers various deployment options, including on-premises and public cloud, but receives mixed feedback on technical support, with some users finding the community more helpful. OpenText provides similar deployment flexibility, with private cloud options, though users have called for more responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AppWorks is competitively priced, typically mid-tier, with a perpetual license model that may initially surprise but stabilizes. Nintex, while often pricier, is seen as offering good value due to its extensive features. Both platforms are noted for delivering ROI through time savings and process efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (15th)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.6%
OpenText Process Automation	1.1%
Other	97.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"The integration capabilities have been very useful."

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."

"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"The tool can be limiting when more complex solutions are required. Improving it to offer greater functionality and less reliance on technical expertise could be beneficial."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The integration could improve."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The price is on the higher side."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Insurance Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

January 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

January 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

No data available

Overview

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

December 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.