it_user434868 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Delivery at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
  • 0
  • 18

What needs improvement with K2?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with K2.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

PeerSpot user
10 Answers
CIO at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 19, 2022

The solution's flexibility can be improved. K2 needs to be fully code-free, and they should try Endeavor to make it code-free. It will help to hide the complexities of smart objects. Improvements can be made because we are implementing one solution and need a solution that integrates into itself. It's very tedious to manage, so they should ensure that everything is integrated and taken care of.

Search for a product comparison
Jindrich Stumpf - PeerSpot reviewer
ITS Pre-Sales Architect at Konica Minolta Business Solutions Czech spol. s.r.o.
Real User
Top 20
Sep 8, 2022

K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak.

Automation Team Lead at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Mar 6, 2021

The Workflow Designer needs improvement. For example, when you design a workflow on K2, it shows the entire area between one action and another action. However, you should be able to see the structure for this action. It's not automatically structured. It sould be automatically structured from the shared action to the following action. In K2, you should be able to organize it by yourself. Workflows should be very easy to organize exactly as you need them. It shouldn't be inflexible. The mapping processes need to be better. You can't really change the look and feel. You should be able to customize the solution a bit more. The document generation, the dynamic document generation, could be a great addition as a feature.

System Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Feb 11, 2021

Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement. If they can simplify the deployment then it would be helpful. I would like to see a versioning tool included within K2 similar to Visual Studio to do your versioning of programs. It would be very useful and assist us a lot. If they could also include an RPA as a tool, or integrate it with RPA products. It would be beneficial, as we wouldn't have to purchase anything else.

Principal Consultant at pure method
Real User
Top 20
Jan 14, 2021

K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows.

Technology Unit Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Sep 9, 2020

Even though the performance is better than the competition, it needs to be enhanced and improved upon. They could always refine this a bit more. The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product. The K2 platform could be enhanced.

Find out what your peers are saying about K2, Nintex, IBM and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: November 2022.
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Program Manager - Intelligent Automation at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 8, 2020

The solution is heavy and cumbersome and it has a very stringent way of doing things. It's not difficult but at the same time it's not flexible enough. If you don't do it properly, you can't render it on mobile properly and it just runs into a lot of issues. I think what we need is a more flexible platform that can actually give us that option, a second option or a main option, to move away from K2. We run into issues at times and it's mainly around the way we design applications and mainly around how we want to use applications. It restricts us in a very specific way to be able to fully utilize the capability. I think K2 is a bit far from being a perfect mobile development platform. We'd like to look at Microsoft as an option.

Chief Information Officer at a construction company with 51-200 employees
Real User
May 10, 2020

I think there can be improvements in the product but that may be linked to the decisions that we have taken to put it on-premise, because now we're making big changes and the scope of the project has changed so that we now want external partners to have access to the system. Because we're on-premise, it's more complicated to provide access to their own network. Next time I would go for the cloud.

OKTAY BOLAT - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
May 26, 2019

It didn't calculate the designs I needed. If a customer doesn't know what to do with the BPM tool, then they won't know how to start using the tool. It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user-friendly and easier to use. Perhaps they may add some different holdings, and if you carry a file which uses either shape, you can handle the document. That's not our preferred method to manage software. Perhaps they could add a simple archiving function in the software. That would be very useful.

Lead Technical Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
May 22, 2019

The SmartForms need to be simplified so that the non-expert, business users can make use of them without coding. That will help a lot. I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI and the robotics. The AI should be able to learn inside the platform so that it adds intelligence to the tool itself. That way, it can handle the things that are being taken care of by external entities. It will first learn how to handle new events, and then handle them by itself in the future.

Related Questions
Alex Siu - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, System Architecture at Octopus Cards Limited
Jun 30, 2021
Hello community members,  I'm working at a financial services company with 200+ employees and I'm currently exploring two Business Process Management Platforms (BPM) in order to use them with Java: K2 BPM and Camunda BPM.  Can you assist me with their comparison (sharing the pros and cons of each)?  Thanks!
See 1 answer
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jun 30, 2021
Hello @Toni Ibanez, @Mohammed Sulty , @Uday Shankar Tummala ​and @TARIQ ISLAM. Can you please help @Alex Siu?
User at rfs
Jan 21, 2021
After K2 was acquired by Nintex, what is the impact for K2 users?
Explore this product
Download Free Report
Download our free Business Process Management (BPM) Report and find out what your peers are saying about K2, Nintex, IBM, and more! Updated: November 2022.
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.