We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and Sophos Mobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The company provides great customer service."
"They always add more features to this product."
"I like the level of interaction that the product offers with the other products in our company's environment."
"The management and enrollment process is great, and with the asset management and instant action menu, we can easily maintain and support the users."
"The security features work well."
"The solution provides us with data protection."
"Sophos can block the Wi-Fi connection on a mobile device. That's one feature we wanted, but the main thing is the ability to disable the device if it's lost or stolen. We need to shut down PayPal, so it can't be used to make unauthorized purchases."
"The initial setup process is straightforward and fast."
"The most valuable feature is the mobile device management capability. You can easily manage all of your mobile devices."
"The mobile and tablet-based versions need improvement because they are not completely user-friendly, compared to the web version. Also, data synchronization with our existing asset manager, the synchronization between multiple assets and multiple devices, takes a lot of time due to the security scanning. It should be reduced."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"I would like the ability to install the agent on devices from suppliers, which would enable us to implement a zero-trust strategy for guest devices."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"It could be more secure."
"To manage the Apple devices is not that straightforward there are a lot of features the other third parties solutions are offering which Sophos Mobile is not."
"The features of Sophos Mobile could improve. The way the system works together could be better. Additionally, the integration with other Sophos products could improve."
"The product does not work well in iOS."
"We would like to see graphics showing the use of each device."
"Our support reps are based in the Philippines, and it's hard to connect with them sometimes. It took me about two months to resolve my issue, so it wasn't a good experience."
"They continue to work on integration with mobile device management and mobile security. They are improving the protection but I think that the capabilities still need to be enhanced."
"In terms of what could be improved, the initial configuration and setup of the environment could probably be made a little bit easier. There are so many pieces that go into it. Intune is absolutely insane and Sophos is better, but it still is a bit complex to get it all set up correctly."
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews while Sophos Mobile is ranked 9th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 13 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while Sophos Mobile is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Mobile writes "Stable product with central administration to manage device security ". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, IBM MaaS360 and BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, whereas Sophos Mobile is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE and Lookout. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. Sophos Mobile report.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
