Google Drive Enterprise vs OpenText Content Management comparison

Google and OpenText are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Google holds a 3.0% mindshare in CCP, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Google Drive Enterprise

Read 77 Google Drive Enterprise reviews

599 Views
145 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Management

Read 21 OpenText Content Management reviews

201 Views
77 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Google Drive Enterprise

OpenText Content Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Google Drive Enterprise and OpenText Content Management both compete in the enterprise cloud storage and content management sector. Google Drive Enterprise generally has the upper hand in user satisfaction thanks to its affordability and seamless Google integration, while OpenText is preferred for its advanced features and integration capabilities with platforms like SAP.

Features: Google Drive Enterprise is known for its ease of sharing, real-time collaboration, and seamless integration with other Google Workspace products. It includes user-friendly storage and offers a free tier with options for additional paid storage. OpenText emphasizes enterprise-level security, comprehensive document categorization, and robust data management features, making it suitable for complex business needs.

Room for Improvement: Google Drive Enterprise could improve in areas like file synchronization, user access management, and integration with non-Google applications. Expanding storage limits would also be beneficial. OpenText Content Management might enhance user-friendliness and support responsiveness, and more automation features could streamline user operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Drive Enterprise, leveraging the public cloud, ensures easy deployment and low maintenance, focusing on simple, stable solutions with minimal technical support. OpenText Content Management, available on-premises and via hybrid cloud, requires more intricate deployment and often demands IT support for installation and maintenance. Customer service interaction varies due to its platform complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Google Drive Enterprise offers cost-effective solutions with a free tier and competitive pricing on paid plans, suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. However, it may incur higher costs for enterprise-level services. OpenText Content Management has a more complex pricing model considered expensive, especially for integration with other services. Despite this, it provides substantial ROI for large enterprises through enhanced content management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Drive Enterprise

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (7th)

OpenText Content Management

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Google Drive Enterprise is 3.0%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Management is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Kepa-Ayerbe

Connectivity Platform Cyber Security Specialist at BASF Business Services GmbH

Offers valuable features like synchronization and backup

Some time ago, I faced issues with Google Drive Enterprise, but it is not related to the tool and was more of a problem associated with Android. At the end of the day, I had to contact Google's support team to deal with the issue associated with the capacity offered by the solution. Google's support team held me for free, and they helped me change the location from the US because the mobile app factory showed that the activation work was done in the US. Google's team helped me move the location to Spain. Google's support was fast, knowledgeable, and customer-friendly. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Enables effective document control yet requires better affordability and clarity

I use extended ECM for procurement, sales, engineering documents, and sometimes invoices and accounts payable or receivable The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace. The seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google Drive Enterprise has helped compile data in one spot."

"The solution's most valuable features are its performance and availability."

"It is an easily scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Compared to other solutions such as Microsoft, this solution offers faster synchronization."

"It is very convenient and easy to access."

"For me, the most important feature is the option to save the documents and then access it from anywhere from a mobile or a desktop, or any other device."

"Some of the most useful features of Google Drive Enterprise is the ability to store my data and share it."

"Google has a lot of tools. They are really useful and they are really simple to use."

More Google Drive Enterprise pros

"The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."

"The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace."

"Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically."

"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."

"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."

"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."

"It's a very good solution."

"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."

Cons

"Security is the only area where there are certain shortcomings in the product where improvements are required."

"The vendor must increase awareness about the tool among the common people."

"Google Drive Enterprise is not scalable."

"There are still many restrictions on what the solution can do on the GenAI front, and much work needs to be done there."

"Some features like transpose are still lacking in the solution for power users."

"Lacks scalability and security."

"Improvements could include better editing features within a Word document, similar to the characteristics of on-premises versions, such as more formatting functions. Another improvement could be file transfer from the browser to the desktop, making it as simple as drag and drop."

"The product must be more secure."

More Google Drive Enterprise cons

"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."

"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."

"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."

"The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."

"The cost of the product could be improved."

"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."

"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."

"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is available for free."

"The licensing is yearly. We pay for the high-tier subscription."

"The product is available for free, so I don't need to pay for it."

"It has a yearly license."

"If you need extra storage for the product, then you need to make certain payments towards the product's licensing charges."

"The price could be better."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The product is free."

More Google Drive Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"The total cost of the product will vary on the capabilities required"

"OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."

"The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."

"It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."

"Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."

"The pricing is costly. It's costly to integrate with Office 365 and to go back and forth with the sales team."

"The product is pricey."

"The solution is expensive."

More OpenText Content Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Drive Enterprise?

With Google Drive Enterprise, multiple people can edit a document, and you can open it as Google Docs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Drive Enterprise?

We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Drive Enterprise?

The search function in Google Drive Enterprise could be improved as it currently requires looking through many documents to find the right one. I am not aware of the security level it provides, and...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?

We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost of the product could be improved. Currently, there are certain snags in document viewing, and communication from the pre-sales team is not clear. The expectation from the customer versus t...

See all answers

Comparisons

ShareFile vs Google Drive Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

Huawei FusionStorage vs Google Drive Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

LucidLink vs Google Drive Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Box vs Google Drive Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Dropbox vs Google Drive Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

More Google Drive Enterprise Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 19% of the time

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 18% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 7% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Drive Enterprise

June 2025

Download Google Drive Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Management

May 2025

Download OpenText Content Management product report

Also Known As

Drive Enterprise, Google Drive

OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share

Overview

Drive Enterprise enables you to transform how your business stores, accesses, and secures files, all without extensive change management. Drive Enterprise is a standalone offering with usage-based pricing that includes all the features of Drive.

Google

OpenText Content Management offers seamless document storage and advanced search features. Ideal for organizations needing integration with SAP and other applications, it enhances workflows while ensuring security and compliance across multiple platforms.

OpenText Content Management stands out with its advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connectivity with SAP and other applications. Its enhanced security and permission systems safeguard information, vital for industries like banking, utilities, and oil & gas. Metadata categorization and customizable workflows aid in managing complex document lifecycles. Although improvements in visibility and integration with external tools are needed, the platform provides powerful collaboration tools, enhancing productivity. Users leverage document retention and WebReports features to ensure compliance. Challenges with support, performance during peak times, and architecture complexity are noted. Automation features and analytics require enhancement, alongside more user-friendly SmartUI and record management functionalities.

What key features define OpenText Content Management?

Powerful Search Functionality: Delivers rapid, accurate search results across content repositories.
Extensive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP and other applications for enhanced workflow management.
Enhanced Security Systems: Advanced security measures and permission systems protect sensitive data.
Metadata for Document Categorization: Organizes documents efficiently with metadata tagging.
Customizable Workflows: Adaptable workflow options cater to diverse organizational needs.
Collaboration Tools: Boosts team productivity through efficient document management and tagging capabilities.
WebReports and Retention: Offers robust reporting and records retention to maintain compliance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Productivity: Streamlined collaboration tools enhance team efficiency.
Regulatory Compliance: Comprehensive retention management ensures adherence to policies.
Enhanced Security: Advanced protective measures secure critical information.
Seamless Integration: Consolidates data flow and operational processes.
Efficient Document Management: Lifecycle management improves organization and retrieval time.

OpenText Content Management is widely utilized in sectors such as banking, utilities, and oil & gas. It is implemented to manage software development projects, engineering documents, and workflow automation. Organizations leverage OpenText Extended ECM for document lifecycle management, post-project archiving, and records retention. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow allows efficient handling of document management across global operations, supporting information governance, tax return compilation, and capital projects.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Journal Communications

ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project

Buyer's Guide

Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management

June 2025

Free Report: Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Drive Enterprise vs. OpenText Content Management report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.