DarwinBox vs PeopleStrong comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

DarwinBox
Ranking in Talent Management
23rd
Ranking in Cloud HCM
16th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
11th
Average Rating
6.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
HR Analytics Software (8th)
PeopleStrong
Ranking in Talent Management
13th
Ranking in Cloud HCM
12th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
9th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of DarwinBox is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleStrong is 2.6%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud HCM
Unique Categories:
Talent Management
1.9%
HR Analytics Software
2.8%
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
5.6%
 

Featured Reviews

Ayushee  Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 18, 2023
The product's servers, integration capabilities, and user interface needs improvement
DarwinBox is not at all a user-friendly product. DarwinBox is a product that needs to be made more user-friendly. DarwinBox's UI is not at all interactive and resembles some website that is made with HTML code, making it a very boring website. From an improvement perspective, DarwinBox's UI needs to be made better. There is no data integration possible with DarwinBox. DarwinBox is not a cloud-based product, and its servers are very messed up. The aforementioned areas concerning DarwinBox are aspects that I don't like and need to be considered for improvement in the future. In general, DrawinBox's servers, integration capabilities, and user interface should be improved. Every functionality that DarwinBox claims to provide to its users needs improvement.
UD
Dec 14, 2023
Has an efficient user interface, but the reporting feature needs improvement
We use the product for recruitment purposes. It helps us with onboarding and exit management The software reduces the cost of investment for recruitment. It provides a good data quality for incentives. We can deliver a consistent workflow experience for our candidates. The product has valuable…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
 

Cons

"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared with SuccessFactors, there is no major difference in DarwinBox's cost."
"My company makes some yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to DarwinBox."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
"It's very reasonably priced. It is paid per employee."
"The pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DarwinBox?
The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping.
What needs improvement with DarwinBox?
The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved. There are some issues when it comes to integrating the solution with the SAP system and banking single channels. Mul...
What is your primary use case for DarwinBox?
We use DarwinBox for payroll and the complete hire-to-fire cycle of employees.
What do you like most about PeopleStrong Alt?
It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature.
What is your primary use case for PeopleStrong Alt?
We use it for our payroll system. We have use cases around the recruitment system with PeopleStrong itself. So, it is one additional service of PeopleStrong.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
PeopleStrong Alt
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Myntra, GVK BIO, Bisleri, Times Internet, Delhivery, Aarti
Hyundai, Amara Raja, Air Asia, Tata Motors, Aviva, Schneider Electric, JLL Business Services, Schindler, Tata AIG, novo nordisk, Cipla
Find out what your peers are saying about DarwinBox vs. PeopleStrong and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.