Azure Monitor pros and cons

Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?).

In terms of pricing, Azure Monitor's billing based on data size can sometimes lead to increased costs, especially when developers need to purge data frequently. While there are mechanisms in place to track and manage this, there is room for improvement in terms of optimizing data pausing and related processes. Enhancements in this area could help mitigate potential billing concerns and provide a more seamless experience for users.

The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved.

The query builder could be better. In comparison to other monitoring tools, in order to use Azure Monitor, your engineers need to have KQL experience. If they don't, it's not intuitive as a system.

It might not have all of the capabilities we will need.

This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better.

Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work.

Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services.

The default interface should be improved.

The monitoring of Kubernetes clusters needs improvement to be on par with competitors.