You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
18,164 views|15,243 comparisons
Sentry Logo
6,230 views|5,440 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 28, 2023

We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Sentry based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Azure Monitor's setup can be time-consuming and difficult for less experienced users due to its cloud-native nature and complexity, whereas Sentry's setup process is generally straightforward and includes built-in features to help users of different expertise levels.
  • Features: Azure Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring in one place and detailed logging at a low cost. On the other hand, Sentry excels in accurate error management and tracking, as well as user-friendly event grouping and integration with Git repository.
  • Pricing: Azure Monitor's pricing can be tricky to estimate as it is based on log file sizing. On the other hand, Sentry offers a free plan for early project stages and expensive paid plans. Users of Sentry can take advantage of the many features available in the open-source version and fine-tune dashboards before considering the paid version. Additionally, users have the option to use the self-hosted open version or pay for the Sentry service through Cloudera.
  • Service and Support: Azure Monitor's support level is dependent on the account type and purchase, resulting in mixed reviews from users. On the other hand, Sentry's customer service has not been widely utilized, but those who have reached out have found community support and documentation to be helpful.
  • ROI: Azure Monitor's ROI is mixed, with some users finding it positive because of its affordability and ease of implementation, while others are dissatisfied. On the other hand, Sentry's ROI has consistently been beneficial.

Comparison Results: After analyzing user feedback, it can be concluded that Azure Monitor is the preferred choice when compared to Sentry. Azure Monitor stands out due to its extensive range of features, such as integration with Visual Studio, Power BI, and additional Azure services. The ease of setup, stability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness are also highly appreciated. Although Sentry is acknowledged for its accuracy and compatibility with multiple tools, Azure Monitor offers a more comprehensive and adaptable solution for monitoring and resolving issues with cloud resources.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Sentry Report (Updated: September 2023).
735,432 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs.""Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data.""The initial setup is straightforward.""Among the valuable features of this solution, Application Insights stands out as one of the most significant. It provides insights into application performance and helps identify issues and bottlenecks.""It's a Microsoft native tool, so it works well with other Microsoft technologies, which is predominantly what our customer end-user base is.""The tools for logs and metrics are pretty good and easy to use.""It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools.""The upside to the solution is if you are working in a Microsoft or Azure environment, it makes things easier."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs.""Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat.""It's a great visibility tool for the developer team.""The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well.""The solution is user-friendly.""Sentry breaks everything down in real time.""The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides.""Its initial setup process is relatively straightforward."

More Sentry Pros →

"Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?).""I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP.""There is room for improvement in stability.""The solution needs better monitoring. It requires better log controls.""Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy.""Lacks information including details related to where problems lie.""This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better.""Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved.""The settings for an administrator are complex.""We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved.""Its debugging feature needs to be faster.""To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features.""I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release.""The price could be lowered.""I would like to see a role registration feature added."

More Sentry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
  • "Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
  • "The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is a monthly fee."
  • "I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
  • "The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
  • More Azure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I am currently using a self-hosted open version."
  • "We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."
  • More Sentry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    735,432 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
    Top Answer:I am monitoring all of my Azure Monitor and getting good reports. I can customize the reports to get the information I need. I am also getting emails about which AAS instances are down and everything… more »
    Top Answer:I have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone… more »
    Top Answer:Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat.
    Top Answer:I don't really think Sentry's that expensive because there's a lot in the open-source version. Once you fine-tune dashboards and things like that, is when you start thinking about moving to the paid… more »
    Top Answer:To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More
    Video Not Available

    Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

    With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

    Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

    Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

    Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

    Sentry’s real-time error tracking gives you insight into production deployments and information to reproduce and fix crashes.

    Learn more about Azure Monitor
    Learn more about Sentry
    Sample Customers
    Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
    Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Insurance Company7%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Small Business78%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Monitor vs. Sentry
    September 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: September 2023.
    735,432 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews while Sentry is ranked 13th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Sentry is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Helps us test the performance and efficiency of cloud applications; good log analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentry writes "A stable alert management application with straightforward and neat documentation". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security, Dynatrace, Prometheus and AWS X-Ray, whereas Sentry is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Azure Monitor vs. Sentry report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.