Microsoft Project Reviews

Microsoft Project significantly improves resource utilization and project timelines, achieving efficiency in cost and administration. Users cut manual management time and enhance tracking, transparency, and reporting. This software consolidates information, streamlining workflows, and preventing delays, which maximizes resource allocation. Users see financial gains as it replaces costlier solutions. Proficiency in using its features leads to precise task management and execution, which makes it beneficial for organizations eager to renew licenses and maintain effective project management.

Enterprise users find Microsoft Project pricing reasonable but often expensive, with cost typically determined by a monthly or annual subscription per user. Prices vary, from $30 monthly per license to higher for comprehensive access. Discounts are available via bundling with Microsoft packages like Office 365. Licensing complexity is noted, but overall, the expenses often align with the product's features and usefulness, making it a valuable, though costly, tool for enterprise-level project management.

• "We purchase perpetual licenses due to the high cost of subscriptions, which are about 1,000 Australian dollars."
• "I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
• "The product is not expensive. My company has opted for an annual subscription."

Users leverage Microsoft Project primarily for project management, particularly in planning, scheduling, and tracking tasks. It facilitates work breakdown structures, financial planning, and timeline management. Many employ its Gantt chart and resource allocation features for IT, infrastructure, and telecommunications projects. The tool helps manage enterprise-level project portfolios, coordinate across teams, and handle complex scheduling, ensuring clear critical paths, task dependencies, and agile execution. Integration with tools like JIRA or Teams enhances collaborative efforts.

Many users rely on in-house support, though Microsoft Partners are sometimes involved. Technical support varies; some users find it responsive and helpful, while others report delays and challenges in reaching the right person. Onsite and offshore models are common. Some appreciate the documentation and online resources. Ratings range from moderate to satisfactory, with occasional dissatisfaction noted. Improvements in language support are acknowledged, particularly in regions like Colombia.

Many users find Microsoft Project's initial setup straightforward and quick, particularly the online version. Complexity increases with enterprise implementations due to customization and integration with existing systems. Setting up becomes more challenging with advanced features, requiring knowledge and training. While some organizations needed specialized consultants, others managed with in-house teams. Deployment times widely varied depending on project requirements, taking anywhere from minutes to weeks. Users often noted the easy installation akin to Microsoft Office products.

Microsoft Project demonstrates strong flexibility, handling numerous users and projects efficiently. It's capable of expanding usage with proper server capacity and can manage extensive project plans. Some find scaling straightforward, while others mention challenges like integration and differentiation between versions. When properly configured, it supports various organizational needs and diverse roles. Although some express concerns regarding licensing costs and server configurations, many view its scalability positively, effectively serving large user bases and complex projects.

Microsoft Project is consistently stable, with no crashes or freezes reported by most users. There are occasional bugs, particularly in large project plans or when sharing resources, but customization helps manage this. It performs well, especially for smaller projects, although some users need feature enhancements for optimal use. Users often rate its stability between eight and nine out of ten, praising its reliability and effective performance under various conditions.