Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Project compete in the project management tools category. Adobe Workfront has the upper hand in collaboration, while Microsoft Project is preferred for planning flexibility.
Features: Adobe Workfront is recognized for its intuitive project collaboration and robust marketing solutions. It stands out in integrating marketing with project management. In contrast, Microsoft Project is known for detailed task scheduling, resource management, and advanced project tracking.
Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront can enhance its task scheduling capabilities, provide more flexibility in resource management, and offer better cost management features. Microsoft Project, on the other hand, could improve by simplifying its interface, enhancing marketing integration, and offering more comprehensive collaboration tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront offers straightforward cloud-based deployment and excellent customer support. Microsoft Project provides flexible deployment options, both on-premises and cloud-based, but has a steeper learning curve and integration challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront has higher initial costs but provides substantial ROI through efficient project delivery and marketing efficiency. Microsoft Project, with lower setup costs, appeals to budget-conscious companies, though its ROI is tied to full utilization of its planning features.
Microsoft Project does help save time and money due to its completeness as a project management solution.
I would give somewhere around 10 for my overall experience with support.
There is a website and a connection to AI for support.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
The worst part is handling too many items, like 1,000 items, which Microsoft Project struggles with, especially when printing.
Maybe some generative AI features such as having tasks or activities being suggested automatically based on the rest of the tasks in the project would be useful; I haven't really missed them so far.
Microsoft Project tends to become very unstable on large project plans with more than 400 lines.
The issue with Microsoft is that the license is per personnel, making it expensive.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
This tool is the most accurate project management tool, allowing me to run a full set of project activities without having to switch between different tools for scheduling and other tasks.
The scheduling part of Microsoft Project is easy; if you change one of the dates, the rest of the dates automatically get changed based on the dependency.
The most valuable features are in the successor and predecessor determination and the tracking tools, such as obtaining data on the S curve financial curve.
AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.
Microsoft Project helps you get started quickly and execute projects with ease. Built-in templates and familiar scheduling tools help project managers and teams stay productive.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
