No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Progress ShareFile Logo

Top 10 Progress ShareFile Alternatives

Vendor: Progress Software
4.2 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Progress ShareFile Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Progress ShareFile based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Google Workspace, CTERA Intelligent Data Platform, and Box - Intelligent Content Management. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Progress ShareFile surpasses its competitors by offering seamless file sharing, robust security measures, and exceptional scalability, ensuring efficient collaboration and data protection tailored to business needs.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Progress ShareFile Logo
Google Workspace
4.1 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Google Workspace
4.1 out of 5
Google Workspace excels with seamless integration and extensive application features. In comparison, Progress ShareFile prioritizes file storage and security, offering advanced encryption. Tech buyers seeking comprehensive tools might choose Workspace, while those prioritizing security could prefer ShareFile's robust data management capabilities.
Download Google Workspace vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Google Workspace offers a competitive setup cost, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher initial expenditure, highlighting a significant cost difference in entry-level investments for these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Workspace offers a competitive setup cost, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher initial expenditure, highlighting a significant cost difference in entry-level investments for these solutions.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
CTERA Intelligent Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
CTERA Intelligent Data Platform emphasizes hybrid cloud management and scalability for handling sensitive information. In comparison, Progress ShareFile focuses on enhanced file-sharing solutions and customization. CTERA's affordability and deployment flexibility attract tech buyers, whereas ShareFile's advanced features and integration provide long-term value.
Download CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs. Progress ShareFile Report
CTERA Intelligent Data Platform offers low initial setup costs, while Progress ShareFile typically requires higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CTERA Intelligent Data Platform offers low initial setup costs, while Progress ShareFile typically requires higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Box - Intelligent Content Management
4.2 out of 5
Box offers seamless integrations and collaboration tools, appealing to businesses prioritizing connectivity. In comparison, ShareFile's strength lies in security features and file-sharing efficiency, attracting those valuing data protection. Tech buyers should assess organizational needs, integration, and cost factors before deciding between Box and ShareFile.
Download Box - Intelligent Content Management vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Box - Intelligent Content Management typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more economical initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Box - Intelligent Content Management typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more economical initial setup.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Dropbox Business - Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Dropbox Business - Enterprise excels in integration, enhancing collaboration with tools like Microsoft Office and Google Workspace. In comparison, Progress ShareFile provides advanced security features like two-step verification, catering to industries requiring rigorous compliance, making it ideal for sensitive data management needs.
Download Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Dropbox Business - Enterprise requires a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more budget-friendly pricing for companies seeking an affordable solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Dropbox Business - Enterprise requires a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more budget-friendly pricing for companies seeking an affordable solution.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
OpenText Content Management
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Content Management is ideal for enterprises needing advanced features and robust security. In comparison, Progress ShareFile attracts with an intuitive interface, rapid deployment, and supportive customer service, making it suitable for businesses valuing simplicity and efficient collaboration over extensive capabilities.
Download OpenText Content Management vs. Progress ShareFile Report
OpenText Content Management has a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements. Progress ShareFile offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Content Management has a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements. Progress ShareFile offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks emphasizes security, compliance, and user-friendly design. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers flexible deployment and a broader range of features. Kiteworks is ideal for security-focused firms, while ShareFile attracts businesses seeking scalability and advanced collaboration tools.
Download Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Kiteworks has a straightforward setup cost, while Progress ShareFile offers a tiered pricing model that varies based on features. Kiteworks may appeal to users seeking simplicity, whereas ShareFile attracts those needing customizable options.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks has a straightforward setup cost, while Progress ShareFile offers a tiered pricing model that varies based on features. Kiteworks may appeal to users seeking simplicity, whereas ShareFile attracts those needing customizable options.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Office 365
4.3 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Office 365
4.3 out of 5
Office 365 excels in pricing and support with a versatile suite of productivity tools suitable for daily operations. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers superior features focusing on secure file sharing and compliance, making it ideal for industries prioritizing data security and management.
Download Office 365 vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Office 365 incurs no setup cost, providing an economically appealing choice, while Progress ShareFile requires an initial setup fee, distinguishing itself with upfront pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Office 365 incurs no setup cost, providing an economically appealing choice, while Progress ShareFile requires an initial setup fee, distinguishing itself with upfront pricing.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Microsoft 365 Business
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft 365 Business enhances productivity with integrated tools like Word and Excel. In comparison, Progress ShareFile specializes in secure file sharing with data encryption. Microsoft 365 attracts tech buyers with broad functionalities, while ShareFile appeals to those focusing on file management.
Download Microsoft 365 Business vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Microsoft 365 Business typically has lower setup costs than Progress ShareFile, providing a cost-effective solution for businesses seeking essential productivity tools. Progress ShareFile may have higher initial expenses due to its advanced file-sharing and storage capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft 365 Business typically has lower setup costs than Progress ShareFile, providing a cost-effective solution for businesses seeking essential productivity tools. Progress ShareFile may have higher initial expenses due to its advanced file-sharing and storage capabilities.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Google Drive Enterprise
4.2 out of 5
Google Drive Enterprise offers seamless Google Workspace integration, ideal for organizations using Google's tools. In comparison, Progress ShareFile excels in security features like encryption, appealing to industries with strict data protection needs, making it attractive for security-focused businesses despite potentially higher upfront costs.
Download Google Drive Enterprise vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Google Drive Enterprise has a low setup cost, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher setup cost, suggesting a focus on comprehensive features and enhanced security.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Drive Enterprise has a low setup cost, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher setup cost, suggesting a focus on comprehensive features and enhanced security.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Egnyte
4.2 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Egnyte
4.2 out of 5
Egnyte's integration versatility and flexible customization appeal to diverse businesses. In comparison, Progress ShareFile attracts those who prioritize security with advanced encryption. Egnyte facilitates easier deployment and training, while Progress ShareFile supports intensive security needs, justifying its higher initial investment.
Download Egnyte vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Egnyte offers transparent setup costs, while Progress ShareFile provides an all-inclusive package with potentially higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Egnyte offers transparent setup costs, while Progress ShareFile provides an all-inclusive package with potentially higher initial fees.
Progress ShareFile Logo
DocuSign
4.2 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
DocuSign
4.2 out of 5
DocuSign excels in advanced digital signatures and seamless integration, appealing to businesses prioritizing workflow automation. In comparison, Progress ShareFile focuses on secure data transfer and collaboration, making it attractive to industries emphasizing data security. Both offer cloud deployment and customer service tailored to specific needs.
Download DocuSign vs. Progress ShareFile Report
DocuSign's setup cost is higher than Progress ShareFile, making it more expensive initially. Progress ShareFile offers a more attractive starting price, but that might reflect in varying features or support differences.
View comparison
Pricing
DocuSign's setup cost is higher than Progress ShareFile, making it more expensive initially. Progress ShareFile offers a more attractive starting price, but that might reflect in varying features or support differences.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Microsoft OneDrive for Business
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft OneDrive for Business excels in integrating with the Microsoft ecosystem, appealing to users seeking seamless collaboration. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers advanced security and customization, making it ideal for industries with strict compliance requirements seeking tailored solutions.
Download Microsoft OneDrive for Business vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Microsoft OneDrive for Business offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Progress ShareFile has more complex and potentially higher setup expenses. The setup cost disparity highlights Microsoft's streamlined approach compared to ShareFile's more intricate initial impleme...
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft OneDrive for Business offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Progress ShareFile has more complex and potentially higher setup expenses. The setup cost disparity highlights Microsoft's streamlined approach compared to ShareFile's more intricate initial impleme...
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server offers robust integration and customization for Microsoft environments. In comparison, Progress ShareFile focuses on secure file sharing and ease of access. A tech buyer may prefer SharePoint for collaboration tools or ShareFile for streamlined security and deployment.
Download Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server has a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Progress ShareFile may provide additional features, but it comes with a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server has a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Progress ShareFile may provide additional features, but it comes with a higher initial investment.
Progress ShareFile Logo
FileCloud
4.0 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
FileCloud
4.0 out of 5
FileCloud offers flexibility in pricing and support, appealing to businesses seeking customization and efficient IT integration. In comparison, Progress ShareFile’s higher cost is justified by its advanced features, enhanced productivity, and optimized remote access, ideal for enterprises prioritizing security and mobile functionality.
Download FileCloud vs. Progress ShareFile Report
FileCloud has variable setup costs depending on the specific deployment needs, while Progress ShareFile presents more transparent and straightforward initial pricing. This difference highlights a possible variation in initial investment expectations for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
FileCloud has variable setup costs depending on the specific deployment needs, while Progress ShareFile presents more transparent and straightforward initial pricing. This difference highlights a possible variation in initial investment expectations for potential users.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Adobe Sign
4.7 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Adobe Sign
4.7 out of 5
Adobe Sign excels in e-signature capabilities and seamless integration, appealing to users prioritizing ease and cost-efficiency. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers advanced document management features and flexibility, making it attractive to those valuing comprehensive functionality and robust customization options.
Download Adobe Sign vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Adobe Sign requires an initial setup cost, while Progress ShareFile offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Sign requires an initial setup cost, while Progress ShareFile offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in pricing strategies.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Amazon WorkDocs
4.0 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Amazon WorkDocs
4.0 out of 5
Amazon WorkDocs effectively integrates with AWS, appealing to businesses engaged in that ecosystem. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers advanced collaboration tools, attractive to enterprises needing comprehensive document management. Progress ShareFile's customization capabilities may outweigh Amazon WorkDocs' competitive pricing for specific needs.
Download Amazon WorkDocs vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Amazon WorkDocs offers a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Progress ShareFile may involve higher initial expenses for its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon WorkDocs offers a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Progress ShareFile may involve higher initial expenses for its comprehensive features.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Oracle Beehive
4.8 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Oracle Beehive
4.8 out of 5
Oracle Beehive offers integrated communication tools and robust pricing. In comparison, Progress ShareFile emphasizes secure, cloud-based file sharing and ease of use. Oracle Beehive's complex deployment suits those needing traditional setups, while Progress ShareFile's SaaS model fits businesses seeking flexible, quick access.
Download Oracle Beehive vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Oracle Beehive tends to have higher setup costs compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Beehive tends to have higher setup costs compared to Progress ShareFile, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Tresorit
1 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Tresorit
1 out of 5
Tresorit excels in security with end-to-end encryption, appealing to data protection-focused organizations. In comparison, Progress ShareFile enhances productivity with comprehensive integration options. A tech buyer might choose Tresorit for security, while Progress ShareFile suits those prioritizing efficient workflow and collaboration.
Tresorit has a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, making Progress ShareFile a more cost-effective option for initial users. Progress ShareFile is attractive due to its lower entry price, while Tresorit’s setup costs are significantly higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Tresorit has a higher setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, making Progress ShareFile a more cost-effective option for initial users. Progress ShareFile is attractive due to its lower entry price, while Tresorit’s setup costs are significantly higher.
Progress ShareFile Logo
SignNow
4.3 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
SignNow
4.3 out of 5
SignNow offers affordability and simplicity for straightforward document workflows, appealing to cost-sensitive buyers. In comparison, Progress ShareFile provides advanced integration and customization, ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive data management. SignNow suits smaller operations, while Progress ShareFile benefits larger enterprises seeking robust capabilities.
Download Progress ShareFile vs. SignNow Report
SignNow offers a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which may interest budget-conscious users. Progress ShareFile, while more expensive, may justify the higher price for users seeking premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
SignNow offers a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which may interest budget-conscious users. Progress ShareFile, while more expensive, may justify the higher price for users seeking premium features.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Dropbox Sign
4.4 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Dropbox Sign
4.4 out of 5
Dropbox Sign attracts tech buyers with its simplicity and seamless document signing integration. In comparison, Progress ShareFile excels by offering extensive file sharing and storage solutions. While Dropbox Sign focuses on affordability, Progress ShareFile's higher price is justified by its robust capabilities.
Download Dropbox Sign vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Dropbox Sign offers straightforward setup costs, while Progress ShareFile presents more complex pricing structures, highlighting their distinct pricing approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Dropbox Sign offers straightforward setup costs, while Progress ShareFile presents more complex pricing structures, highlighting their distinct pricing approaches.
Progress ShareFile Logo
PandaDoc
4.3 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
PandaDoc
4.3 out of 5
PandaDoc excels in document-centric features like creation and automation, ideal for transaction-heavy businesses. In comparison, Progress ShareFile provides secure file sharing and integration, appealing to enterprises needing robust collaboration and security compliance. Each solution addresses distinct business needs effectively.
Download PandaDoc vs. Progress ShareFile Report
PandaDoc requires no setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while Progress ShareFile involves a setup fee, distinguishing itself with added initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PandaDoc requires no setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while Progress ShareFile involves a setup fee, distinguishing itself with added initial investment.
Progress ShareFile Logo
eXo Platform
1 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
eXo Platform
1 out of 5
eXo Platform offers versatile collaboration tools with attractive pricing and adaptable deployment options. In comparison, Progress ShareFile features advanced security and seamless integration, appealing to organizations needing robust file-sharing solutions. Both cater to different organizational priorities, making their competitive features appealing for varied tech needs.
eXo Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which charges higher fees for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
eXo Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Progress ShareFile, which charges higher fees for initial setup.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Zoho Sign
4.1 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Zoho Sign
4.1 out of 5
Zoho Sign appeals to buyers seeking cost-effective integration and ease of deployment within Zoho's ecosystem. In comparison, Progress ShareFile attracts those requiring robust file sharing, collaboration, and security features, despite a more intricate setup process.
Download Progress ShareFile vs. Zoho Sign Report
Zoho Sign offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, whereas Progress ShareFile has a higher initial expense, reflecting its feature-rich capabilities aimed at enterprise-level solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zoho Sign offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, whereas Progress ShareFile has a higher initial expense, reflecting its feature-rich capabilities aimed at enterprise-level solutions.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Conga Sign
4.3 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Conga Sign
4.3 out of 5
Conga Sign excels in integration and ease of use, appealing to those seeking an efficient, cost-effective solution. In comparison, Progress ShareFile attracts businesses focused on security and control, offering advanced features that justify its premium pricing for stringent compliance needs.
Download Conga Sign vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Conga Sign has moderate setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas Progress ShareFile requires a more substantial investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Conga Sign has moderate setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas Progress ShareFile requires a more substantial investment for setup.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
BlackBerry Workspaces
3.5 out of 5
BlackBerry Workspaces excels in security, offering features like encryption and digital rights management, ideal for security-prioritized organizations. In comparison, Progress ShareFile focuses on collaboration with seamless app integration, appealing to teams prioritizing easy deployment and cost-effective productivity solutions.
BlackBerry Workspaces has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Progress ShareFile can involve higher setup expenses. These distinct cost structures highlight the differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Workspaces has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Progress ShareFile can involve higher setup expenses. These distinct cost structures highlight the differences between the two solutions.
Progress ShareFile Logo
ownCloud
5.0 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
ownCloud
5.0 out of 5
ownCloud offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness through its open-source nature. In comparison, Progress ShareFile excels with secure access features catering to strict compliance needs. ownCloud appeals to businesses needing customization, while Progress ShareFile is preferred for those prioritizing security and ease of use.
ownCloud typically involves lower initial setup costs, making it more attractive for budget-conscious users, while Progress ShareFile may require a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
ownCloud typically involves lower initial setup costs, making it more attractive for budget-conscious users, while Progress ShareFile may require a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and advanced capabilities.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Nintex eSign
4.0 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
Nintex eSign
4.0 out of 5
Nintex eSign enhances digital workflows with electronic signature automation and customizable processes. In comparison, Progress ShareFile emphasizes secure file sharing and storage. Nintex offers cost-efficient pricing, while Progress provides broader support and security, catering to diverse enterprise needs.
Download Nintex eSign vs. Progress ShareFile Report
Nintex eSign incurs a minimal setup cost, making it financially accessible, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher initial expense, potentially reflecting its range of features.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex eSign incurs a minimal setup cost, making it financially accessible, while Progress ShareFile presents a higher initial expense, potentially reflecting its range of features.
Progress ShareFile Logo
Progress ShareFile Logo
Leapfile Managed File Transfer
1 out of 5
Leapfile Managed File Transfer excels in affordability and strong customer support, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Progress ShareFile offers robust collaborative tools and flexible deployment, making it attractive for organizations prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term ROI over initial cost savings.
Leapfile Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost, while Progress ShareFile incurs higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Leapfile Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost, while Progress ShareFile incurs higher initial fees.
Progress ShareFile Logo
ComSignTrust
1 out of 5
Progress ShareFile Logo
ComSignTrust
1 out of 5
ComSignTrust excels in digital signatures, offering security and compliance, appealing to cost-conscious users. In comparison, Progress ShareFile provides superior file sharing, integration, and collaboration features, attracting enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions. Both cater to distinct digital document management needs effectively.
ComSignTrust offers a more flexible setup cost, whereas Progress ShareFile presents a structured pricing model suitable for large-scale users.
View comparison
Pricing
ComSignTrust offers a more flexible setup cost, whereas Progress ShareFile presents a structured pricing model suitable for large-scale users.

Related categories

Content Collaboration Platforms
Cloud Data Exchange Services
eSignature (Electronic Signature)