No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo

Top 10 Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks CN-Series based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, and Netgate pfSense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series surpasses its competitors by offering robust container security and advanced threat prevention, ensuring comprehensive protection and seamless integration within Kubernetes environments.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate offers comprehensive features and attractive pricing for cost-effective security, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks CN-Series delivers advanced capabilities and cloud integrations, ideal for those prioritizing sophisticated security despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
Fortinet FortiGate offers a more attractive setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks CN-Series presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate offers a more attractive setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks CN-Series presents a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall excels in integration and support, appealing to those seeking simplified management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks CN-Series offers advanced threat analysis, ideal for those prioritizing AI-driven security. Cisco's cost-effectiveness attracts budget-conscious buyers, whereas CN-Series justifies its price with premium features.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
Cisco Secure Firewall has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Palo Alto Networks CN-Series setup is more complex, potentially incurring higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Palo Alto Networks CN-Series setup is more complex, potentially incurring higher initial expenses.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense is used for firewall protection, VPN, load balancing, and bandwidth management. Organizations value its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility. Users praise its customization, user-friendly interface, and open-source nature. Improvements are needed in graphical monitoring, VPN capabilities, plugin compatibility, and centralized management, with better documentation desired for ease of use.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
PFSENSE turns out to be very economical, the license is free and for little money you get very good support
If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.
View comparison
Pricing
PFSENSE turns out to be very economical, the license is free and for little money you get very good support
If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers robust firewall capabilities and ease of deployment, appealing to those seeking simplicity and quick implementation. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks CN-Series impresses with deep packet inspection and advanced threat protection, catering to buyers prioritizing comprehensive security features.
Download Palo Alto Networks CN-Series vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox presents a more affordable setup cost, whereas Palo Alto Networks CN-Series offers a setup requiring a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox presents a more affordable setup cost, whereas Palo Alto Networks CN-Series offers a setup requiring a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE is appreciated for cost-effectiveness, straightforward deployment, and support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks CN-Series excels in advanced security features, requiring more technical expertise but offering higher ROI for those prioritizing feature-rich solutions despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks CN-Series tends to have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks CN-Series tends to have higher initial expenses.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Azure Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Azure Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Azure Firewall secures networks and applications within Azure, filtering and inspecting traffic for perimeter security while protecting workloads and controlling internet access. Key features include Azure integration, threat filtering, scalability, automation, SSL/TLS inspection, centralized controls, logging, and cost-effectiveness, but lacks advanced filtering, VPN capabilities, and slower support compared to competitors.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
Azure Firewall is quite an expensive product.
The licensing module is good.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall is quite an expensive product.
The licensing module is good.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX Series Firewall serves industries like finance and education, offering data center and network security. It excels in virtualization, high availability, and connectivity. Users appreciate its robust security and simplified management. Needed enhancements include a streamlined interface, better IoT support, and improved pricing, documentation, and customer service.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
The prices are very good as compared to other vendors.
Pricing is good. Most of the costs are in the UTM (IDS/IPS, virus scanning, etc) subscription.
View comparison
Pricing
The prices are very good as compared to other vendors.
Pricing is good. Most of the costs are in the UTM (IDS/IPS, virus scanning, etc) subscription.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiOS is an operating system used by organizations for firewall functions, securing networks with VPNs, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and network segmentation. Supporting small to enterprise environments, it integrates SD-WAN, UTM features, and offers efficient threat prevention. Users seek enhanced interfaces, real-time monitoring, improved DDoS protection, and robust integration options.
Download Fortinet FortiOS vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
Be sure to choose a licensing plan that leaves a little headroom so performance is not an issue.
The program is expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Be sure to choose a licensing plan that leaves a little headroom so performance is not an issue.
The program is expensive.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Zscaler Cloud Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Organizations utilize Zscaler Cloud Firewall for security and internet access management. It offers granular policies, blocks non-standard traffic, secures remote access, and integrates with ZTNA. Businesses appreciate malware detection, real-time inspection, and cost benefits. Enhancements are needed in deployment, support, UI, and policy flexibility to improve user experience.
Download Palo Alto Networks CN-Series vs. Zscaler Cloud Firewall Report
The licensing is on a yearly basis. It is somewhere around 30 or 40 pounds per user for our organization.
There are licensing costs, and I would not say that it's a cheap vendor.
View comparison
Pricing
The licensing is on a yearly basis. It is somewhere around 30 or 40 pounds per user for our organization.
There are licensing costs, and I would not say that it's a cheap vendor.
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Logo
Check Point Quantum Force
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series excels in customer support and pricing metrics with advanced threat prevention capabilities. In comparison, Check Point Quantum Force offers extensive threat detection and customizability, appealing to those needing robust features, though requiring a higher initial investment and a steeper learning curve.
Download Check Point Quantum Force vs. Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Report
The Palo Alto Networks CN-Series offers a moderate setup cost experience, while Check Point Quantum Force is known for a higher initial investment. These distinctions highlight clear financial considerations when assessing startup expenses for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
The Palo Alto Networks CN-Series offers a moderate setup cost experience, while Check Point Quantum Force is known for a higher initial investment. These distinctions highlight clear financial considerations when assessing startup expenses for each solution.

Related categories

Firewalls
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)