Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Lansweeper Logo

Top 10 Lansweeper Alternatives

Vendor: Lansweeper
4.2 out of 5
Start review

Top Lansweeper Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Lansweeper based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include ServiceNow, Qualys VMDR, and ServiceNow Discovery. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Lansweeper surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive IT asset management with automated discovery, detailed reporting, and seamless integration capabilities, enabling businesses to efficiently manage and optimize their IT infrastructure with ease and precision.

Lansweeper Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Lansweeper, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Lansweeper Logo
ServiceNow
4.3 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
ServiceNow
4.3 out of 5
ServiceNow excels in customization and integration for IT and business management, ideal for companies needing tailored solutions. In comparison, Lansweeper prioritizes user-friendly asset management, offering detailed insights and cost-effectiveness for organizations focusing on precise IT inventory tracking.
Download Lansweeper vs. ServiceNow Report
ServiceNow incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Lansweeper, which offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Lansweeper, which offers a more affordable setup option.
Lansweeper Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management with comprehensive scanning and real-time detection. In comparison, Lansweeper focuses on asset management and user monitoring. A tech buyer seeking robust security features might choose Qualys, while those prioritizing efficient asset oversight may prefer Lansweeper.
Download Lansweeper vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Lansweeper offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting the cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Lansweeper offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting the cost difference.
Lansweeper Logo
Lansweeper Logo
ServiceNow Discovery
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Discovery offers comprehensive integration with ITSM and ITOM, suitable for complex IT environments. In comparison, Lansweeper is ideal for small to medium businesses with its flexible asset management. Lansweeper excels in cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, while ServiceNow Discovery supports diverse cloud environments.
Download Lansweeper vs. ServiceNow Discovery Report
ServiceNow Discovery often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on complex IT environments, whereas Lansweeper generally offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with less intricate infrastructure needs.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Discovery often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on complex IT environments, whereas Lansweeper generally offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with less intricate infrastructure needs.
Lansweeper Logo
Device42
4.2 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Device42
4.2 out of 5
Device42 focuses on security and relational mapping, making it ideal for security-focused IT environments. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in detailed inventory, appealing to large organizations prioritizing asset management. Device42's robust support contrasts with Lansweeper's cost-effective pricing, catering to diverse tech buyer needs.
Download Device42 vs. Lansweeper Report
Device42 has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, highlighting the differences in initial investment. Lansweeper offers a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Device42 has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, highlighting the differences in initial investment. Lansweeper offers a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Lansweeper Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
Freshservice supports ITIL-compliant processes through automation and analytics, ideal for centralized IT services. In comparison, Lansweeper focuses on IT asset management, providing inventory tracking suited for large networks, appealing to those prioritizing cybersecurity compliance.
Download Freshservice vs. Lansweeper Report
Freshservice requires upfront costs for setup, while Lansweeper offers a more budget-friendly setup with lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Freshservice requires upfront costs for setup, while Lansweeper offers a more budget-friendly setup with lower initial expenses.
Lansweeper Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
Spiceworks excels with minimal setup in ticketing and network integration, ideal for SMBs. In comparison, Lansweeper delivers extensive IT asset management, crucial for cybersecurity. Spiceworks offers a free model; Lansweeper provides broader, scalable features for growing enterprises.
Download Lansweeper vs. Spiceworks Report
Spiceworks offers no setup cost, making initial deployment straightforward, while Lansweeper includes a variable setup cost, which can affect budget planning.
View comparison
Pricing
Spiceworks offers no setup cost, making initial deployment straightforward, while Lansweeper includes a variable setup cost, which can affect budget planning.
Lansweeper Logo
Lansweeper Logo
BMC Helix Discovery
4.2 out of 5
BMC Helix Discovery offers advanced features like application dependency mapping and high security, appealing to those seeking comprehensive infrastructure visibility. In comparison, Lansweeper provides detailed IT asset management and affordability, ideal for small and medium businesses needing flexible deployment.
Download BMC Helix Discovery vs. Lansweeper Report
BMC Helix Discovery incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which is more budget-friendly. This cost difference might affect the decision for businesses prioritizing upfront financial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Helix Discovery incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which is more budget-friendly. This cost difference might affect the decision for businesses prioritizing upfront financial expenditure.
Lansweeper Logo
BMC Remedy
4.0 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
BMC Remedy
4.0 out of 5
BMC Remedy's robust asset management features and scalability appeal to larger enterprises. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in ease of deployment and affordability, making it ideal for small to medium businesses seeking efficient IT asset management. BMC Remedy's technical support contrasts with Lansweeper's simplicity.
Download BMC Remedy vs. Lansweeper Report
BMC Remedy has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Remedy has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Lansweeper Logo
Lansweeper Logo
ManageEngine IT Asset Management
4.4 out of 5
ManageEngine IT Asset Management provides strong compliance management and easy integration, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lansweeper offers a centralized management dashboard and efficient customer service, ideal for those valuing comprehensive asset discovery and a user-friendly setup process.
Download Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management Report
ManageEngine IT Asset Management incurs higher setup costs, while Lansweeper offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine IT Asset Management incurs higher setup costs, while Lansweeper offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Lansweeper Logo
Flexera One
4.3 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Flexera One
4.3 out of 5
Flexera One excels in cloud management and data integration, beneficial for enterprises with complex IT infrastructures. In comparison, Lansweeper offers superior asset discovery, ideal for companies seeking detailed network management. Flexera One provides better cloud insights, while Lansweeper ensures ease of on-premise deployment.
Download Flexera One vs. Lansweeper Report
Flexera One incurs higher setup costs with extensive configuration needs, while Lansweeper offers a more straightforward setup process that is less financially demanding, emphasizing Flexera One’s comprehensive but costly implementation compared to Lansweeper’s economical and simple ins...
View comparison
Pricing
Flexera One incurs higher setup costs with extensive configuration needs, while Lansweeper offers a more straightforward setup process that is less financially demanding, emphasizing Flexera One’s comprehensive but costly implementation compared to Lansweeper’s economical and simple ins...
Lansweeper Logo
Faddom
1 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
Faddom
1 out of 5

Faddom is the application observability platform for the secure era. Be in control of your business applications with our agentless application dependency mapping platform. Visualize your on-premise and cloud infrastructure with continuous, automatic updates in as little as 60 minutes and see all your servers and applications and how they are connected to each other.

View comparison
Lansweeper Logo
BMC Track-It!
3.7 out of 5
Lansweeper Logo
BMC Track-It!
3.7 out of 5
BMC Track-It! emphasizes straightforward IT management with accessible deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-minded buyers. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in network scanning and extensive features, making it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive asset visibility and advanced integration options.
Download BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper Report
BMC Track-It! requires an initial setup cost, while Lansweeper offers a more flexible pricing structure with relatively lower costs. BMC Track-It! may incur higher initial expenses, setting it apart from Lansweeper's cost-effective approach.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Track-It! requires an initial setup cost, while Lansweeper offers a more flexible pricing structure with relatively lower costs. BMC Track-It! may incur higher initial expenses, setting it apart from Lansweeper's cost-effective approach.
Lansweeper Logo
Lansweeper Logo
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance
3.7 out of 5
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is ideal for those prioritizing efficient automation and customer support. In comparison, Lansweeper offers superior inventory management and lower upfront costs, catering to complex IT environments. Each solution presents unique benefits for various organizational needs.
Download Lansweeper vs. Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance Report
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance offers a more predictable setup cost due to its all-inclusive pricing, while Lansweeper provides a flexible, potentially lower initial expense with its pay-as-you-go model.
View comparison
Pricing
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance offers a more predictable setup cost due to its all-inclusive pricing, while Lansweeper provides a flexible, potentially lower initial expense with its pay-as-you-go model.

Related categories

IT Asset Management
Help Desk Software
IT Service Management (ITSM)