BMC Track-It! vs Lansweeper comparison

BMC Helix and Lansweeper are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #16, while Lansweeper is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 66% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lansweeper users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Track-It! and Lansweeper are competitive products in IT asset management and help desk solutions. Lansweeper has an edge due to its comprehensive asset discovery capabilities, while Track-It! is notable for its integrated help desk solutions.

Features: Track-It! emphasizes help desk functions such as ticketing and workflow automation, along with purchase tracking and auditing features. It also supports parent-child ticketing for better organization. Lansweeper offers advanced asset tracking and network discovery, detailed log-on monitoring, and CPU, memory, and network usage tracking. It supports both agent and agentless scanning, providing flexibility in deployment.

Room for Improvement: Track-It! could enhance customization options and improve its reporting capabilities for better management insights. It also needs advancements in compatibility with ideal processes and overall stability. Lansweeper could expand its help desk functionalities and improve its agent-based deployment. Additionally, simplifying its reporting options for non-power users could make it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Track-It! offers a straightforward deployment process with robust implementation support, ensuring ease of use. Customers commend its superior customer support. Lansweeper focuses on seamless network integration with an easy setup process. It has good technical support, aiding quick adaptation to network environments.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Track-It! features a moderate setup cost that promises good ROI through enhanced service management efficiency. Lansweeper, while potentially more costly, justifies its pricing with extensive asset tracking and network monitoring capabilities, offering substantial ROI. Track-It! is valued for its cost-effectiveness with service desks, while Lansweeper furnishes a notable return through comprehensive network insights.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer2287086

ICT Manager at a legal firm with 11-50 employees

Provides good stability, but it could be intuitive and easier to use

The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.

Read full review

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Significant asset management capabilities boost IT efficiency and support proactive monitoring

A positive aspect of Lansweeper is that they maintain a 30-minute recurring schedule with us for feedback. I have mentioned to the Lansweeper team that I would appreciate a clear separation between computers joined to our on-premise domain and those joined to the Microsoft Entra directory, as this distinction is currently difficult to make. In terms of reporting and knowledge, Lansweeper completely fulfills our needs. The software installation capability is being phased out as they now have the cloud version app, where this ability and Actions have been removed. My experience is primarily with Windows systems in Lansweeper, but it also supports Mac systems. We are currently adding Macs to scanning, though functionality is somewhat limited compared to Windows. It scans servers too, though this isn't the primary focus. Regarding network scanning, there are some security considerations due to specific service or port requirements on switches. For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product. Building reports is straightforward, and while the database is quite extensive and may require research depending on needs, the information is readily available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The MetaBot is a very good feature that allows me to do things that were not available in earlier versions."

"The Automation Anywhere University is a good tool. It goes topic-by-topic with real-time examples."

"At run time, Automation Anywhere can let you know which line of code the bot is running and what it is doing. It is very clear."

"It is easy to fix bug issues which you encounter in the post-production process."

"Comparing to other products in the market, we are getting all the features in hundred percent quality with what the objective needs to be met by other products, and that is also delivered in Automation Anywhere."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. It's very user-friendly."

"Automation Anywhere has significantly improved our organization's efficiency. Across various processes, we have achieved a 90% time savings for each use case, making our workflow much more streamlined and productive."

"It is easy to use and developer-friendly. The development time is very short. If any system needs to be changed or any functionality needs to be incorporated to any of the technology, it usually will be a long process, like months. With this innovative tool's automation, it is very dynamic, easy to develop, and deliver results quickly. With some of our use cases, we were able to deliver within the time frame of two to three weeks, which is the biggest plus with this tool."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"The solution is quite stable, and we've found it to be reliable and free from bugs and glitches that affect its usability."

"Using the Help Desk and Purchasing modules, they let us keep track of all the issues in our organization and analyze them for trends."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"Our efficiency has improved drastically due to a massive reduction in phone calls."

"Track-It! has many features that help make us more efficient and cost effective as a department."

"The customization of the product and reporting capabilities have allowed us to provide upper management the graphs (data) they request that helps validate specific needs that we (IT) have."

"We can manually capture the assets available within the location."

"As a department, we have been able to identify problems and resolve them faster because of the centralized database."

More BMC Track-It! pros

"Its functionality is very solid. The best part about it is that, when you have issues in getting information back from nodes, it tells you what the issue is, and you can quickly go to the specific nodes and respond to or repair those. There is an agent option, but to me, as a small business, the preference is to avoid agents where possible because you probably don't have the staff to keep up with them all."

"Lansweeper is performing exceptionally; as soon as it detects something on the network, it immediately adds it to Lansweeper, and the connection between the endpoint and the server is doing a really good job."

"We have seen a return on investment with Lansweeper, as we save time preparing reports for Microsoft, and it has been very useful in terms of cost savings."

"The use of Teams for EdgeScript agent and agentless scanning of devices within our network proves valuable."

"The solution has an excellent health status feature and a user-friendly interface that contains all necessary information."

"Lansweeper was hands down the best tool; it collects every last piece of information we wanted to know about our equipment and has strong reporting capabilities."

"It is very flexible and very powerful. The reporting scripts that are continually posted are a real benefit. It makes it easier for someone who is a consumer, but not necessarily a power user, to quickly create and run reports, get updates, and know what tasks need to be performed."

"Provides good reports from every asset."

More Lansweeper pros

Cons

"One thing I learned with Co-Pilot is that it is very static. For instance, when dealing with tables and their headers, I must program them in a form. If my build changes, I have to return to my form and update the table titles. Features like looping are missing from Co-Pilot."

"We have used the technical support. I am quite unhappy with the support part."

"The areas for room for improvement are always going to be around experience, making it even easier to get engaged, and get started. Because lowering that threshold to get started is what enables an additional set of problems to be solved."

"The workflow has a complex drag-and-drop interface that is not user-friendly and requires a good technical understanding, which can be challenging for users."

"On the document automation side, the document learning features are not as robust as one would expect them to be. When I am doing document automation and a document fails due to low confidence in populating a field, it requires manual correction."

"The main request I have for Automation Anywhere is to focus more on technical demonstrations."

"They could improve the learning curve."

"We've struggled with some of the new features Automation Anywhere added in the latest version. For example, they added a new OpenAI package, but it took a while for me to find it in the actions menu."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"Their self-service is not user friendly."

"The area where we would like to see improvement is in the asset management module."

"The solution is cumbersome to use."

"There are a few items that I would like changed or extra features that could be added to our current version of this software, but those are all going to be addressed in a future software update."

"The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version."

"Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult."

"Currently, if you go and check the reports in the packet, the reports are useless; reporting is really bad."

"I did not use the ITSM tools aspect, which connects to a CMDB, because that was not how I utilized the BMC tool, so I do not have an opinion on how it could be improved."

"We're trying to use it for the help desk, but that's not exactly its strong suit."

"It would be beneficial if the solution could show more account-related information, beyond just the main Active Directory user account, and include management capabilities for other account types."

"For example, Lansweeper can scan 7-Zip version 7.2, but when a new version 7.3 comes out, Lansweeper shows it as new software, requiring us to manually add this software to the whitelist or change it in reports; it should be counted as the previous version."

"The support is an area that could improve. The support staff could be more knowledgeable."

"The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal."

"It would be great if Lansweeper could combine security functions like vulnerability management."

"In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements."

More Lansweeper cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid separately for the Runner and Creater components. The final cost depends on the structure of your environment."

"We brought onshore a lot of what we were doing offshore, saving our company close to $20 million."

"In most of the cases, the product value is very good. If the infrastructure, implementation, and framework are good, then generally, the client can get a good return on investment."

"It's cheapest among the competition, although bargaining is a must."

"The licensing needs to be made simpler or shortened."

"I would rate the cost an eight out of ten, with ten being the highest cost."

"If you look at the capital expenditure, Automation Anywhere is number two to UiPath. But if you take a long-term view, on a scalable model of a large number of bots coming out, it slowly goes on to become the costliest tool. There is something they can do about that. The capital expenditure goes out right at the point of buying the tool. For Automation Anywhere, I would need to spend $20,000. UiPath can give me something for $6,000, while Blue Prism will come in at $300,000."

"AA comes at a more affordable price than the other tools."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"BMC Track-It!’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."

"It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."

"It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	154
Midsize Enterprise	82
Large Enterprise	536

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

It is difficult for me to suggest improvements to Lansweeper since I thought it performed effectively for its intende...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lansweeper?

My use cases with Lansweeper primarily involve discovery for data center migrations. I did this when I worked for my ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 7% of the time

WorkFusion vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

ServiceNow vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 13% of the time

BMC Helix Discovery vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 13% of the time

Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 12% of the time

Open iT, Inc. vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 9% of the time

USU Valuemation vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 7% of the time

More BMC Track-It! Competitors

ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs Lansweeper

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 13% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Lansweeper

Compared 8% of the time

Spiceworks vs Lansweeper

Compared 8% of the time

Statlook Free vs Lansweeper

Compared 4% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

June 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

June 2026

Download BMC Track-It! product report

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper

June 2026

Download Lansweeper product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

BMC Numara Track-It!, Numara Track-It!, Numara

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

BMC Helix

Demo not available

Lansweeper

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

BMC Track-It! offers robust customization and reporting, allowing effective IT management through essential data provision, ease of setup, and maintaining stability.

Organizations employ BMC Track-It! primarily for help desk management, effectively managing incidents, service requests, and IT assets. It facilitates logging and resolving calls, improving proactive responses and accommodating growing IT service demands. Users highlight its capabilities in change and problem management, ensuring availability and prompt response even under increased workloads.

What are the key features of BMC Track-It!?

Customization and Reporting: Allows tailored solutions and essential data provision for validating IT needs.
Parent/Child Ticket Feature: Enhances tracking by linking related tickets together.
Audit Trail and User Surveys: Keeps detailed records of changes and obtains user feedback for improvements.
Help Desk and Purchasing Modules: Offers comprehensive issue tracking, trend analysis, and manages stock and work orders.
Flexible Setup Process: Ensures ease of implementation without enforcing strict processes on technicians.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: By efficiently managing calls and incidents, users can focus on more strategic tasks.
Improved Response Times: Fast resolution of tickets ensures high availability of IT services.
Flexible Implementation: The straightforward setup allows quick adaptation to organizational workflows.
Reduced Service Desk Calls: Proactive management reduces overall demand for service desk support.

BMC Track-It! is widely implemented across industries to support IT management needs, providing effective help desk solutions that balance user demands and technology capabilities. Its integration is particularly noticeable in sectors with complex IT infrastructures requiring reliable service management and asset tracking.

BMC Helix

Lansweeper provides efficient IT asset management, automating scanning, discovery, and reporting while offering robust cloud capabilities. It's designed for IT, security, and executive teams to enhance insights and strategic planning.

Lansweeper is known for its comprehensive IT asset management features, including automated scanning, detailed reporting options, and extensive hardware and software tracking. Its agentless deployment and support for various platforms boost performance and usability, facilitating real-time data management with cloud capabilities. While many value Lansweeper's robust functionality, users point to areas for improvement, such as customer support, enhanced cloud features, and report customization. Scalability in large networks and better integration of security functions like vulnerability management are noted as areas for growth.

What are Lansweeper's key features?

Automated Scanning: Efficiently discovers and tracks hardware and software assets without manual intervention.
Centralized Dashboards: Offers a unified view of asset data across multiple platforms.
Cloud Capabilities: Ensures real-time data access and management anytime, anywhere.
Vast Reporting Options: Provides customizable and detailed reports for in-depth analysis.
Agentless Deployment: Simplifies implementation across devices without needing software agents.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Control: Manages IT budgets effectively with comprehensive asset tracking.
Compliance Tracking: Ensures adherence to industry regulations through detailed reporting.
Strategic Planning: Offers insights that aid long-term IT and security planning.
Enhanced Security: Monitors device and software status to identify potential vulnerabilities.
Improved Efficiency: Automates many tasks, freeing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

Lansweeper is widely implemented in industries to manage IT and OT assets, offering detailed endpoint monitoring, automated task scheduling, and desktop inventory management. Companies utilize it for license counting, software deployment, and enhancing security by tracking device status and software updates.

Lansweeper

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Florida Hospital, Mitchell International

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper

June 2026

Free Report: BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Track-It! vs. Lansweeper report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.