CA Asset Portfolio Management vs Lansweeper comparison

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Read 9 Lansweeper reviews

2,263 Views
1,063 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

CA Asset Portfolio Management and Lansweeper are competing products in the IT asset management sector. Lansweeper has the upper hand due to its robust features, offering a worthwhile investment.

Features: CA Asset Portfolio Management offers comprehensive lifecycle management, advanced analytics, and full integration with the service desk. Lansweeper provides automated network discovery, detailed asset reporting, and a robust help desk service.

Room for Improvement: CA Asset Portfolio Management could benefit from simplifying its complex processes, reducing initial costs, and enhancing integration capabilities. Lansweeper may improve by expanding its feature set, refining support for larger networks, and optimizing reporting functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Asset Portfolio Management provides a flexible deployment model with notable customer service but can be complex and time-consuming. Lansweeper's deployment is straightforward with rapid configuration and reliable support, preferred for speedy implementations.

Pricing and ROI: CA Asset Portfolio Management involves higher initial setup costs but delivers significant ROI over time. Lansweeper offers cost-effective pricing with a quicker ROI by providing essential features without undue overhead, appealing to budget-conscious purchasers.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Lansweeper Report (Updated: June 2025).

CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Lansweeper

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Ranking in IT Asset Management

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

License Management (13th)

Lansweeper

Ranking in IT Asset Management

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of CA Asset Portfolio Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lansweeper is 12.7%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1998918

Enterprise systems management team lead

Integrates well, highly stable, and scalable

CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish. There are some other solutions that are better, such as Micro Focus. We have approximately 10,000 PCs that we are busy processing and we have to upload information to them but when we use this solution it is complex. When we use Micro Focus it is better.

Read full review

Victor Vu

Regional IT Infrastructure Operations Specialist at Deheus

Efficient asset management with room to address pricing and security concerns

We use Lansweeper primarily for scan discovery and device access discovery within our IT environment The use of Teams for EdgeScript agent and agentless scanning of devices within our network proves valuable. It provides us with detailed information such as GPU, CPU, memory, and OS after scanning…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Being able to determine the licensing position for existing vendors and future vendors. Also, visibility into our environment,"

"My organization now understands what type of products they have: warranties, how long the warranties last, depreciation. We never really knew what our depreciation values were, so it was really nice to have that on hand as well. It gives us a better view of our hardware, which is really beneficial."

"You build the items one time and then you have your discovery that's coming in and the system will let you know whether or not you're out of compliance."

"Also, the software you have, you can monitor for end of life. If you have software that is end of life, then you can have it uninstalled and buy the new software, so you can make sure that you're not running into vulnerabilities with unsupported software in your environment."

"The most valuable feature of CA Asset Portfolio Management is the full integration with our Service Desk. It allows us to work both sides of life cycle management."

"They're staying up to date as vendors make changes to how they want to manage the software. CA is usually really quick about getting those updates in the system."

"Enables me to know where an asset is at any point during its lifecycle: How old it is, who it belongs to, and where it's at within that lifecycle."

"It's easy to integrate with our system information."

More CA Asset Portfolio Management pros

"One valuable feature is the ability to monitor log-on times, providing insights into whether users are rebooting their machines as claimed. This is useful in scenarios where users may not be aware of the need to reboot for system optimization. Lansweeper helps verify such information by collecting log data. Another noteworthy feature is the capability to track CPU, memory, and network usage on workstations at intervals, say every thirty minutes. This allows me to assess the user's experience and validate their claims about resource consumption. For instance, if a user complains about high memory usage, Lansweeper enables me to verify the actual usage and address the issue accurately. This level of monitoring granularity is something I find particularly useful and haven't seen in many other tools."

"The solution provides inventory information that is very important to our company."

"A great value is the fact that it supports multiple platforms, and it is agentless. Obviously, it still requires credentials, but being agentless makes it much easier to deploy, especially for a small business. It leaves fewer things to maintain. Especially for a small or medium business, it is a tremendous product."

"Lansweeper is very easy to use, and its technical support is very good."

"We've found the most value right now in the inventory of the equipment."

"The use of Teams for EdgeScript agent and agentless scanning of devices within our network proves valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Lansweeper is that it can gather all the devices online and offline and generate proper IT assets."

"Its functionality is very solid. The best part about it is that, when you have issues in getting information back from nodes, it tells you what the issue is, and you can quickly go to the specific nodes and respond to or repair those. There is an agent option, but to me, as a small business, the preference is to avoid agents where possible because you probably don't have the staff to keep up with them all."

More Lansweeper pros

Cons

"CA SAM is not a CA product. The vendor is Aspera and CA is the distributor, so support is difficult. It's more difficult to get a good response."

"CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish. There are some other solutions that are better, such as Micro Focus."

"I'd like to see end-of-life information on software products."

"I'd like to see more mobile. I'd like to have it actually manage mobile devices. It really doesn't, and I'd like to have a mobile application just for asset management."

"Keeping the catalog updated and having more titles in the catalog is helpful, because the more items that are in the catalog, your process goes faster because you don't have to manually build all the entitlements."

"It needs stronger rebooting components and the ability to develop our own software metrics."

"The UI, even though they upgraded the UI, it's still kind of dated, it's a little bit convoluted to use. It's not like something that you can sit down and automatically understand how to use it."

"I would like to see more control over audit trail features, where you can turn on and off fields."

More CA Asset Portfolio Management cons

"The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal."

"It would be great if Lansweeper could combine security functions like vulnerability management."

"I don't have any complaints about it, and I've never really had any issues. It isn't wizard-driven or anything like that, but it doesn't need to be. For someone who is not familiar with system administration, it would be daunting. There would be a lot of info there. They wouldn't necessarily know what to do, but that's not its target audience. For its target audience, in particular, it doesn't need to change. It is really a good tool."

"In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements."

"The support is an area that could improve. The support staff could be more knowledgeable."

"Lacks an end-to-end asset management tool."

"The feature to deploy software in endpoints needs to be improved."

"In Vietnam, there's no Lansweeper office, making it difficult to find the right vendor to get the license."

More Lansweeper cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."

"It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."

"It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Lansweeper?

One valuable feature is the ability to monitor log-on times, providing insights into whether users are rebooting their machines as claimed. This is useful in scenarios where users may not be aware ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

They purchased licenses for around 300 to 400 users or devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements. They can export specific information, for example, if I want to export only hard disk...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs Lansweeper

Compared 39% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 20% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Lansweeper

Compared 11% of the time

Device42 vs Lansweeper

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow vs Lansweeper

Compared 6% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

Product Reports

CA Asset Portfolio Management

Download CA Asset Portfolio Management product report

Download Lansweeper product report

Also Known As

CA IT Asset Manager, CA Asset Manager, ITAM, IT Asset Manager, CA SAM, CA Software Asset Manager, Asset Portfolio Management, Asset Portfolio Manager

No data available

Overview

CA Asset Manager gives you the confidence to deliver real business value throughout the asset lifecycle by enabling essential business functions such as
procurement, contract, vendor, license and financial management across your enterprise IT asset base. CA Asset Manager has recognized technology leadership in the areas of financial and contract management, and it is also an IT asset management market share leader.

Learn More: https://www.ca.com/us/products...

Broadcom

Managing IT has never been a bigger challenge. Hardware, software, and users can be anywhere at any time, making IT environments extremely dynamic and often complex. A seemingly simple question has become terribly difficult to answer: ‘Who is using what?’ This question inspired Lansweeper and still drives us today. We believe that answering it is crucial to tackle and simplify many of the challenges IT professionals face every day.

MISSION
At Lansweeper we develop and support our software which builds and leverages a system of record in any IT environment.

Sample Customers

First Horizon National Corporation, Logicalis, Racing and Wagering Western Australia

Information Not Available

CA Asset Portfolio Management vs. Lansweeper