Lansweeper vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management comparison

Lansweeper and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Lansweeper is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while ManageEngine is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6. Lansweeper holds a 6.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lansweeper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Lansweeper

Read 17 Lansweeper reviews

2,327 Views
2,327 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Read 9 ManageEngine IT Asset Management reviews

1,618 Views
1,375 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lansweeper

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Lansweeper compete in the IT asset management category. ManageEngine excels in pricing and support while Lansweeper's superior feature set gives it a competitive edge.

Features: ManageEngine IT Asset Management helps with tracking asset details, software license management, and integration with financial systems for tasks like depreciation. It supports network inventory and ensures compatibility with service desks. Lansweeper offers advanced network scanning capabilities, enables monitoring of CPU and memory usage, and provides detailed asset reports, including IP addresses and firmware information.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine could benefit from enhancing its network scan capabilities, expanding reporting options for easier data insights, and improving its automation features for asset management tasks. Lansweeper has room to enhance its help desk service potential, simplify its interface for users unfamiliar with IT tools, and improve the detail in its default reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine offers intuitive deployment both on-premises and via the cloud, with responsive customer support ensuring a seamless implementation process. Lansweeper focuses on a cloud-first deployment strategy and provides straightforward setup, making it scalable from 1,000 to 1,000,000 devices while maintaining strong customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine's competitive pricing structure is especially appealing to larger organizations, ensuring a quick return on investment with its comprehensive features. Although Lansweeper may have a higher initial setup cost, its innovative feature set contributes to a strong ROI over time, particularly through efficient asset management and reporting capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lansweeper

Ranking in IT Asset Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

License Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of Lansweeper is 6.1%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is 4.3%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Lansweeper	6.1%
ManageEngine IT Asset Management	4.3%
Other	89.6%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Significant asset management capabilities boost IT efficiency and support proactive monitoring

A positive aspect of Lansweeper is that they maintain a 30-minute recurring schedule with us for feedback. I have mentioned to the Lansweeper team that I would appreciate a clear separation between computers joined to our on-premise domain and those joined to the Microsoft Entra directory, as this distinction is currently difficult to make. In terms of reporting and knowledge, Lansweeper completely fulfills our needs. The software installation capability is being phased out as they now have the cloud version app, where this ability and Actions have been removed. My experience is primarily with Windows systems in Lansweeper, but it also supports Mac systems. We are currently adding Macs to scanning, though functionality is somewhat limited compared to Windows. It scans servers too, though this isn't the primary focus. Regarding network scanning, there are some security considerations due to specific service or port requirements on switches. For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product. Building reports is straightforward, and while the database is quite extensive and may require research depending on needs, the information is readily available.

Read full review

Sampath Kumar K

IT infra Admin at synu

User-friendly modules impress with customization options while IT knowledge base updates remain incomplete

It's a vast product, and we use ManageEngine IT Asset Management because it has an Ops Manager, Event Viewer, Site 24/7, PAM360, and AD Manager among many options that we plan to explore in the future environment. ManageEngine IT Asset Management explores detailed aspects such as RAM frequency, RAM brand, product, expiry date, users, roles, technicians, groups, support groups, Active Directory, SAML, single sign-on, LDAP, Microsoft Entra ID, proxy settings, and template forms. We are satisfied with the product because each module is user-friendly, and we can customize it based on our organization's requirements. We are looking into the automated IT asset discovery feature. We have configured the incoming and outgoing mail server so that when users send an email to our standardized mail ID, it automatically creates a ticket. In the future, we will explore automation features such as SLA, KPI, and KRA to align targets, manage resources, assess project utilization, and assign tickets based on priority levels.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One valuable feature is the ability to monitor log-on times, providing insights into whether users are rebooting their machines as claimed. This is useful in scenarios where users may not be aware of the need to reboot for system optimization. Lansweeper helps verify such information by collecting log data. Another noteworthy feature is the capability to track CPU, memory, and network usage on workstations at intervals, say every thirty minutes. This allows me to assess the user's experience and validate their claims about resource consumption. For instance, if a user complains about high memory usage, Lansweeper enables me to verify the actual usage and address the issue accurately. This level of monitoring granularity is something I find particularly useful and haven't seen in many other tools."

"For a small business that has an administrator or a couple of administrators that need tons of information in a central location, and that has some compliance people that have to run reports and are not necessarily power users, it is a great product."

"The most valuable feature of Lansweeper is IT asset management. In the realm of cybersecurity, having knowledge of what is on the network is critical. We are able to conduct reports and see the assets we have. Initially, the solution required a machine on the local network to scan everything, but it has evolved to include agents that can report to a device, and more recently, an agent that can send data to the cloud even if the device is outside of the network. This has proven to be especially useful during the pandemic, as it has allowed us to keep track of devices that have been sent home with employees."

"It is very flexible and very powerful. The reporting scripts that are continually posted are a real benefit. It makes it easier for someone who is a consumer, but not necessarily a power user, to quickly create and run reports, get updates, and know what tasks need to be performed."

"For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product."

"Lansweeper is performing exceptionally; as soon as it detects something on the network, it immediately adds it to Lansweeper, and the connection between the endpoint and the server is doing a really good job."

"We have seen a return on investment with Lansweeper, as we save time preparing reports for Microsoft, and it has been very useful in terms of cost savings."

"The solution has an excellent health status feature and a user-friendly interface that contains all necessary information."

More Lansweeper pros

"It's very smart. I use it with minimal adjustments needed."

"In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."

"As far as IT Asset Management is concerned, I would rate it at ten out of ten."

"The technical support is great."

"The most valuable component of the ITSM tool is the help desk due to its organized way of raising tickets."

"ManageEngine IT Asset Management helps with guarantee and warranty period management, license expiration tracking, device patches, and integration with our finance system for depreciation and invoicing."

"The most valuable component of the ITSM tool is the help desk due to its organized way of raising tickets."

"It is a great product, and we are very satisfied with the features."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management pros

Cons

"For example, Lansweeper can scan 7-Zip version 7.2, but when a new version 7.3 comes out, Lansweeper shows it as new software, requiring us to manually add this software to the whitelist or change it in reports; it should be counted as the previous version."

"In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements."

"I think they should come up with an end-to-end asset management tool."

"The feature to deploy software in endpoints needs to be improved."

"It would be beneficial if the solution could show more account-related information, beyond just the main Active Directory user account, and include management capabilities for other account types."

"The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal."

"It would be great if Lansweeper could combine security functions like vulnerability management."

"Lacks an end-to-end asset management tool."

More Lansweeper cons

"Responses from ManageEngine should be faster."

"The engineering area needs improvement."

"I would love to see a digital adoption feature or guide that navigates first-time users through the application, as it is quite complex with many relevant and irrelevant elements."

"Currently, we are having some challenges in managing assets. We are still managing them in Excel sheets and keeping a track of them outside the system."

"The asset management tool is costly."

"It would be helpful if there were a premium technician license that includes all the suites, eliminating the need to buy separate licenses for each feature."

"It requires some development to be better, more comfortable, and usable, enhancing customer satisfaction."

"I hope it includes barcode features, as barcode scanning and MacAdes cannot currently be mapped with this field."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."

"The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."

"It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."

"Its price is reasonable, but I wish it was lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

It is difficult for me to suggest improvements to Lansweeper since I thought it performed effectively for its intended purpose. I did not use the ITSM tools aspect, which connects to a CMDB, becaus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lansweeper?

My use cases with Lansweeper primarily involve discovery for data center migrations. I did this when I worked for my company, where we used BMC's Discovery for asset discovery. Another customer wan...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

The pricing of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is publicly available, so customers can verify its fairness. Some companies may request discounts, which ManageEngine can provide. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

When we encounter issues with ManageEngine IT Asset Management, we check the online portal or ChatGPT, and they provide numerous knowledge bases on YouTube and Google. However, the issue is that th...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

The pricing of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is handled by the management team, so I am not involved with that aspect. I consider it a stable solution. My overall rating for ManageEngine IT Asse...

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 16% of the time

Device42 vs Lansweeper

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Lansweeper

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow vs Lansweeper

Compared 6% of the time

Spiceworks vs Lansweeper

Compared 6% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 14% of the time

Snow License Manager vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Freshservice vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper

March 2026

Download Lansweeper product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine IT Asset Management

March 2026

Download ManageEngine IT Asset Management product report

Overview

Managing IT has never been a bigger challenge. Hardware, software, and users can be anywhere at any time, making IT environments extremely dynamic and often complex. A seemingly simple question has become terribly difficult to answer: ‘Who is using what?’ This question inspired Lansweeper and still drives us today. We believe that answering it is crucial to tackle and simplify many of the challenges IT professionals face every day.

MISSION
At Lansweeper we develop and support our software which builds and leverages a system of record in any IT environment.

Lansweeper

ManageEngine AssetExplorer is a web-based IT Asset Management (ITAM) software that helps you monitor and manage assets in your network from Planning phase to Disposal phase. AssetExplorer provides you with a number of ways to ensure discovery of all the assets in your network. You can manage software & hardware assets, ensure software license compliance and track purchase orders & contracts - the whole nine yards! AssetExplorer is very easy to install and works right out of the box.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TRA

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

March 2026

Free Report: Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.