KACE Asset Management Appliance vs Lansweeper comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and Lansweeper are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Quest Software is ranked #16, while Lansweeper is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 66% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lansweeper users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

KACE Asset Management Appliance and Lansweeper are IT asset management products. Lansweeper is preferred for its extensive features, while KACE is noted for pricing and support.

Features: KACE Asset Management Appliance provides hardware and software auditing, license compliance, and patch management. Lansweeper offers IP scanning, subnet management, and enhanced data discovery tools.

Room for Improvement: KACE could enhance its comprehensive feature set and integrate advanced data tools. Lansweeper can improve deployment ease without prior networking knowledge and enhance detailed usage monitoring features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KACE offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive support services, beneficial for smooth transitions. Lansweeper is recognized for flexible deployment options suitable for various network sizes but may require some expertise in discovery tools.

Pricing and ROI: KACE has a cost-effective setup with strong ROI potential through streamlined license management. Lansweeper, while having a higher setup cost, offers substantial ROI through comprehensive asset visibility and efficient resource allocation.

To learn more, read our detailed KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Nadeem K.

Rpa Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Automation has freed teams from repetitive finance and supply tasks and supports global operations

In the current organization, we had trouble initially because I think the documentation and support could be better than what it is now. This is one difference between Automation Anywhere and other RPA tools such as UiPath. In UiPath, if you have an issue, you go to the UiPath website and search for it, and you get lots of help materials. In Automation Anywhere, you do not get exactly what you are looking for. You get a very large number of results when you search for something, and from this large result set, you have to filter out what you need, or only partial information will be available. User handbooks are available for each product. In that regard, I would say Automation Anywhere is lagging compared to other RPA tools. It is difficult to get hold of their customer support team. I want to clarify that it is not a matter of us building logic on Automation Anywhere and it failing. When it is a product-related issue, they have to give us support because we only know how to develop within Automation Anywhere. We do not know how to fix Automation Anywhere itself. Whenever we have an issue, trying to get in touch with them always takes three to four business days.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Remote control and massive deployment streamline operations efficiently

It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase. The requirement for employees to be certified before purchasing is understandable yet can be a hurdle. A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial. More training deals, up-to-date articles, and improved documentation would help users navigate the solution more intuitively.

Read full review

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Significant asset management capabilities boost IT efficiency and support proactive monitoring

A positive aspect of Lansweeper is that they maintain a 30-minute recurring schedule with us for feedback. I have mentioned to the Lansweeper team that I would appreciate a clear separation between computers joined to our on-premise domain and those joined to the Microsoft Entra directory, as this distinction is currently difficult to make. In terms of reporting and knowledge, Lansweeper completely fulfills our needs. The software installation capability is being phased out as they now have the cloud version app, where this ability and Actions have been removed. My experience is primarily with Windows systems in Lansweeper, but it also supports Mac systems. We are currently adding Macs to scanning, though functionality is somewhat limited compared to Windows. It scans servers too, though this isn't the primary focus. Regarding network scanning, there are some security considerations due to specific service or port requirements on switches. For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product. Building reports is straightforward, and while the database is quite extensive and may require research depending on needs, the information is readily available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Basically, to be frank, most of the features are awesome."

"Bot Insights is neatly integrated into the platform, which enables us to develop rapidly and train the learning instances using pre-defined domains over the purchase orders, forms, and invoices that need to be processed."

"The data capture feature is very valuable. I know there are also some elements where you have to be able to incorporate AI, but I haven't gotten to that level yet."

"The stability of Automation Anywhere is not a concern when deployed on the cloud."

"Automation Anywhere is very easy to handle because it is a low-code platform, so anyone can learn very quickly."

"The technical support has been good in my experience. However, you need to use the latest version to get the right level of support. If it is an end-of-life version, you might not get support from Automation Anywhere."

"By using its AI & ML capabilities, we have solved many problems for our clients."

"The Object Cloning command is the most useful feature. Through the use of this command, between 30% and 40% of the process automation is complete."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"Feature-wise, I think it's more to do with the usability. It's pretty simple and it's got a very low learning curve, so that helps a lot. Feature-wise, things work pretty well as it's provided a lot of information available on the guides and the manuals, and things work as per the description."

"If you consider cost, support, stability, and usability, then it's better; it's slightly on the costlier side, but it's much more stable than most of the other solutions."

"We have a support team here in India that has been helpful. We have not reached out to the global support for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance."

"The platform offers efficient stability."

"The solution is scalable."

"We utilize the package management feature the most. We also use it for getting the inventory. Companies like us don't have an inventory or asset management system per se. A lot of companies, for instance, use SCCM as their asset management tool. We are using Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance for asset management, which is a good feature. The feature that I really like is to be able to upgrade to the Windows management systems or Windows version. It is very seamless, and I have found it fairly good."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is highly stable."

"The inventory in Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is very valuable."

More KACE Asset Management Appliance pros

"The most valuable feature of Lansweeper is IT asset management. In the realm of cybersecurity, having knowledge of what is on the network is critical. We are able to conduct reports and see the assets we have. Initially, the solution required a machine on the local network to scan everything, but it has evolved to include agents that can report to a device, and more recently, an agent that can send data to the cloud even if the device is outside of the network. This has proven to be especially useful during the pandemic, as it has allowed us to keep track of devices that have been sent home with employees."

"Provides good reports from every asset."

"A great value is the fact that it supports multiple platforms, and it is agentless. Obviously, it still requires credentials, but being agentless makes it much easier to deploy, especially for a small business. It leaves fewer things to maintain. Especially for a small or medium business, it is a tremendous product."

"The solution provides inventory information that is very important to our company."

"For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product."

"The solution has an excellent health status feature and a user-friendly interface that contains all necessary information."

"Lansweeper is performing exceptionally; as soon as it detects something on the network, it immediately adds it to Lansweeper, and the connection between the endpoint and the server is doing a really good job."

"Lansweeper is very easy to use, and its technical support is very good."

More Lansweeper pros

Cons

"PDF extraction and cognitive automation need improvement."

"However, if documents are scanned and not clear, the accuracy is not up to the mark."

"The initial setup is difficult because Automation Anywhere does not have a GitHub integration. They need to build a patch for that."

"The AA portal should not give us pop-ups every time a bot agent is updated."

"From an ease of use point of view, on a scale of one to ten with ten being really easy, I would rate the tool a six."

"Pricing with respect to the competitors is more."

"Debugging can be particularly tricky; identifying the exact reasons for bot failures can be time-consuming."

"Product support for our customers needs improvement. They should increase the support personnel."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The initial setup was burdensome for us because we manually deployed it."

"The remote desktop tool they are using needs improvement. They have integrated some third-party tools for remote desktop connections but that is a bit complicated. That can be further simplified."

"It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase."

"A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial."

"The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance could improve areas related to the management of updates, especially concerning new operating systems."

"The first thing I don't like about KACE is that it needs to have a proper service desk. The categories and the command section do not reflect the users and the permanent users porting commands on updating. There is an issue and delay in loading the commands. We also want a proper structure for infrastructure management. Also, the AI chatbot and user template options are missing."

"Sometimes, it feels like the inventory it takes is not 100% accurate. I would say it is correct 90% of the time. We have had some issues. So, we have to rely on some factors of inconsistency in the data."

More KACE Asset Management Appliance cons

"In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements."

"The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal."

"The disadvantages in comparison to other products are in the ITSM part and the CMDB."

"It would be beneficial if the solution could show more account-related information, beyond just the main Active Directory user account, and include management capabilities for other account types."

"I don't have any complaints about it, and I've never really had any issues. It isn't wizard-driven or anything like that, but it doesn't need to be. For someone who is not familiar with system administration, it would be daunting. There would be a lot of info there. They wouldn't necessarily know what to do, but that's not its target audience. For its target audience, in particular, it doesn't need to change. It is really a good tool."

"The support is an area that could improve. The support staff could be more knowledgeable."

"There is one thing that could be improved."

"I did not use the ITSM tools aspect, which connects to a CMDB, because that was not how I utilized the BMC tool, so I do not have an opinion on how it could be improved."

More Lansweeper cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is reasonable and affordable. If you consider the tasks that we can get done using this, the pricing is reasonable and affordable."

"The cloud-based version comes at an increased cost, although our clients are happy with the new features and have not complained about the pricing."

"Annual licensing costs would be about $100,000."

"Automation Anywhere is affordable."

"One of the key features that we chose, the bot as a service or the BotFarm, when they launched version 11.3, they decided not to have the BotFarm anymore. This put us in a situation because we expected to have bots on demand, just like our cloud software. This would have been cost efficient for us to use. We hope to see this again being realized with A2019. I hope the scalability from an on demand basis improves."

"The initial setup and licensing fees are high, and although it saves costs in the long run, reaching the break-even point can take at least six months."

"It's cheaper than other similar solutions."

"It's fine. However, I'm concerned with the credits in terms of the pricing for the AI models. It is understandable that the new ones are more expensive, but the base models, after doing the pricing conversion, cost about four to ten times as much as paying directly."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"It is less expensive as compared to SCCM."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance provides two remote desktop licenses which are helpful. The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

"It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."

"It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."

"The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."

"Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	162
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	566

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

They are maybe on the higher end, however, their solutions suit bigger companies well. Building a solution out of sma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase. The requirement for employees to be certified before purch...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

I am more on the sales side of the business, so I do not use it that much. However, companies with more than fifty em...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

It is difficult for me to suggest improvements to Lansweeper since I thought it performed effectively for its intende...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lansweeper?

My use cases with Lansweeper primarily involve discovery for data center migrations. I did this when I worked for my ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

HyperScience vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

ServiceNow vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys Exposure Management vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 12% of the time

InvGate Assets vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 12% of the time

Freshservice vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 7% of the time

Device42 vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 5% of the time

More KACE Asset Management Appliance Competitors

ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs Lansweeper

Compared 13% of the time

Qualys Exposure Management vs Lansweeper

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 12% of the time

Spiceworks vs Lansweeper

Compared 9% of the time

BMC Helix Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 3% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

November 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

October 2026

Download KACE Asset Management Appliance product report

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper

October 2026

Download Lansweeper product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

KACE Asset Management Appliance, KACE Asset Management

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Quest Software

Demo not available

Lansweeper

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

KACE Asset Management Appliance provides effective inventory capabilities and remote management tools, making it a suitable choice for large-scale deployments with a focus on usability and compliance reporting.

The KACE Asset Management Appliance is recognized for its practical features in IT environments. Its capacity for inventory, remote control, and large-scale deployments is noted, alongside efficient package management. Remote management of systems and printers, streamlined Windows upgrades, and comprehensive guides are key aspects. While businesses may use SCCM, KACE stands out in asset management. Current suggestions for improvement include AI integration, infrastructure management, enhanced service desk functions, and better update management. Its existing remote desktop tool is viewed as complex, with in-house alternatives sought. Achieving more precise data accuracy and including MDM for mobile devices, plus more intuitive training materials, are desired enhancements.

What are KACE Asset Management Appliance's most important features?

Inventory Capabilities: Provides an organized view of assets.
Remote Management: Controls systems and printers from a distance.
Package Deployment: Facilitates software installation and updates.
Compliance Reporting: Ensures regulatory adherence.
Windows Upgrades: Seamlessly transitions to new versions.

What benefits should users look for in KACE Asset Management Appliance reviews?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex processes for users.
Low Learning Curve: Requires minimal training for operation.
Centralized Management: Integrates desktop and laptop data consolidation.
Time Savings: Streamlines IT tasks reducing manual effort.

KACE Asset Management Appliance is used in industries for efficient inventory package deployment and IT service desk management. Organizations leverage it to deploy both Windows and non-Windows patches, install authorized software, and execute Windows upgrades, supporting enterprises with extensive client bases and simplifying private cloud deployments.

Quest Software

Lansweeper provides efficient IT asset management, automating scanning, discovery, and reporting while offering robust cloud capabilities. It's designed for IT, security, and executive teams to enhance insights and strategic planning.

Lansweeper is known for its comprehensive IT asset management features, including automated scanning, detailed reporting options, and extensive hardware and software tracking. Its agentless deployment and support for various platforms boost performance and usability, facilitating real-time data management with cloud capabilities. While many value Lansweeper's robust functionality, users point to areas for improvement, such as customer support, enhanced cloud features, and report customization. Scalability in large networks and better integration of security functions like vulnerability management are noted as areas for growth.

What are Lansweeper's key features?

Automated Scanning: Efficiently discovers and tracks hardware and software assets without manual intervention.
Centralized Dashboards: Offers a unified view of asset data across multiple platforms.
Cloud Capabilities: Ensures real-time data access and management anytime, anywhere.
Vast Reporting Options: Provides customizable and detailed reports for in-depth analysis.
Agentless Deployment: Simplifies implementation across devices without needing software agents.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Control: Manages IT budgets effectively with comprehensive asset tracking.
Compliance Tracking: Ensures adherence to industry regulations through detailed reporting.
Strategic Planning: Offers insights that aid long-term IT and security planning.
Enhanced Security: Monitors device and software status to identify potential vulnerabilities.
Improved Efficiency: Automates many tasks, freeing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

Lansweeper is widely implemented in industries to manage IT and OT assets, offering detailed endpoint monitoring, automated task scheduling, and desktop inventory management. Companies utilize it for license counting, software deployment, and enhancing security by tracking device status and software updates.

Lansweeper

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Coastal Community Credit Union, St. Dominic Hospital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper

November 2026

Free Report: KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper

Find out what your peers are saying about KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KACE Asset Management Appliance vs. Lansweeper report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.