We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like it because it makes it easy to communicate, chat, make video calls, and schedule meetings with people."
"The solution is relatively stable."
"The product is continually growing to add new features and functionality."
"Microsoft Teams is much easier to collaborate, and its meetings are quite easy to explain things."
"Integration with document management capabilities and video conferencing."
"The solution is perfect and works pretty well. It gets your streaming and helps to get your calls. I like it a lot."
"It's great for meetings and even hybrid classes, for example, where the teacher has students attending in person and online at the same time. It's really convenient for that too, and I like that you can easily share presentations."
"I find the ability to maintain group and conference information for project-related work useful."
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"The security feature is valuable."
"The solution should improve its user interface and recording features."
"I think they can improve the all those segments for channel bulking. Also, some functionalities which migrated from Skype for Business to Teams, is not supported by Teams. We had used them in Skype for Business."
"The desktop and mobile apps are quite different."
"Microsoft Teams withdrew the Wiki function, which was quite a good and useful feature."
"The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally."
"It could be improved if it was easier to use and the interface was revamped."
"There are a lot of frequent updates, which is a shortcoming of the tool."
"They should include AI features in the solution."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement."
"The initial setup process is not intuitive."
"The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"The integration with Outlook could be improved."
"Improve the user-friendliness."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 144 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.