We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration of online jobs and documents is one of the most valuable aspects of the solution. The ability to integrate tasks and to assign tasks to certain people is great."
"The mobile app really enabled us to connect meetings on the go from anywhere."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collaborate."
"Organizing a meeting is very simple to do."
"It's great for meeting conferences."
"The group chat is very good."
"You can use Microsoft Teams to chat with people, share your documents, manage your calendar, manage your project, and assign tasks."
"Microsoft Teams is much more stable than other solutions like Skype for Business."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The overall functions are good."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The entire product is good."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"The solution's stability can be better."
"The user interface is non-intuitive and should be improved."
"The solution's security feature needs enhancement for external collaborations with business partners and vendors."
"We face issues related to screen-sharing and stability. It is very difficult to get Microsoft's support to troubleshoot the issues. The product also needs to update its recording features."
"Microsoft Teams could log in faster."
"The solution should improve internal and external data expansion. I am not able to send records to an external member who has been added to the call. I am only able to send the file to the internal member. These features should be enabled in that Teams so that during the call, we can share the document file and discuss at the same time."
"What I'd like to improve in Microsoft Teams are the calendar management and task management tools, because they're not easy to use. They're not user-friendly."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 144 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas Symphony is most compared with Slack, Drupal, SharePoint and Office 365. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.