We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Real User Monitor and Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Management (APM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"Working with the solution is very easy. It's user-friendly."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."
"It does everything we wanted it to do."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"We like the performance of the product."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"The reporting feature is good for us."
"Very easy to implement."
"The observability is great and valuable."
"It's scalable and expands well."
"ITSI's most valuable feature is that it's easy to integrate DLP."
"We liked the built-in calculation of health scores."
"The flexibility to develop and consolidate many solutions into one platform is great."
"In my opinion, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is better than QRadar. With the help of Splunk, we can get results."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it."
"One thing that we noticed was that historical information was only for a limited period, which was not helpful in certain scenarios. For example, if I want to size my system for an event for New Year or Christmas season based on the historical data, I won't be able to find the historical data. Currently, the data is limited to three months. It would be helpful if they can provide historical data for a longer duration so that we can plan our system accordingly."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"This technology is considered to be older."
"Some issues with login errors."
"It would be good if an interface was included in the next release."
"The dashboard queries should be improved. More queries should be suggested in order to produce better dashboards."
"We'd like them to show more inputs on the dashboard."
"We also faced challenges relating to UI development."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
"The cost of the license could be lower."
More Micro Focus Real User Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Micro Focus Real User Monitor is ranked 46th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews while Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 6 reviews. Micro Focus Real User Monitor is rated 7.0, while Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Real User Monitor writes "Reasonably priced, good reporting, and is reliable but they should use code injection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) writes "Can predict incidents before they impact your customers". Micro Focus Real User Monitor is most compared with AppDynamics, Google Stackdriver, Dynatrace, VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and Datadog, whereas Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Loom Systems and Splunk. See our Micro Focus Real User Monitor vs. Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
