We performed a comparison between Meta4 and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the Personnel Administration."
"It simplifies everything for human capital management, and all users can do self-enrollment for leaves and those kinds of things. The employee self-service feature is quite a powerful feature for me. You can install it on your mobile phone or iPad and do your employee service activity there."
"The setup was straightforward."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"The technical support is quite good."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"The speed of technical support can be improved."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"I'm currently working for a state-owned government company, and we need to follow some standards and regulations. We also have a strategy to be followed. Sometimes the template and the format are not available in the SAP HCM, so we have to work around this limitation. The tax also sometimes changes in my country, and we have to redo everything to change the payroll calculations, benefits, and things like that. The talent management feature can be improved. It is currently very simple in SAP HCM. SAP is also very hard to integrate. In terms of monitoring, there are no monitoring tools, but as long as we take care of the disk capacity, there is no problem."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
"The extensibility of the integration could be improved."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
"There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules."
"The solution is rather expensive."
Meta4 is ranked 16th in Talent Management with 3 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 10 reviews. Meta4 is rated 7.0, while SAP HCM is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Meta4 writes "Good HR solution which has allowed us to track all relevant employee information while scaling our business across different countries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "It simplifies everything for human capital management and is stable and scalable". Meta4 is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and Personal & Informatik Loga. See our Meta4 vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
