LogicMonitor vs Loom Systems comparison

LogicMonitor and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. LogicMonitor is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.3, while ServiceNow is ranked #63. LogicMonitor holds a 2.1% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogicMonitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

LogicMonitor

Read 27 LogicMonitor reviews

4,380 Views
2,584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

554 Views
355 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

LogicMonitor

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LogicMonitor and Loom Systems compete in IT monitoring and analytics. LogicMonitor leads in scalability and integration, while Loom Systems is favored for AI-driven insights. LogicMonitor shows advantages in pricing and support, whereas Loom Systems stands out for its unique AI features.

Features: LogicMonitor offers extensive integration capabilities, a robust alert system, and suitability for complex IT environments. Loom Systems provides AI-driven analytics, predictive insights, and enhanced diagnostic performance, focusing on proactive issue resolution.

Room for Improvement: LogicMonitor could benefit from enhancing its AI capabilities, simplifying its user interface, and expanding its real-time analytics. Loom Systems might improve by offering more flexible pricing options, expanding its integration capabilities, and providing better documentation for its AI features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogicMonitor ensures a straightforward deployment with ample support resources and comprehensive guidance for a smooth setup. Loom Systems offers efficient deployment with specialized customer support to optimize AI functionalities through niche expertise.

Pricing and ROI: LogicMonitor provides competitive pricing with a flexible model that ensures clear ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Loom Systems, potentially higher in cost, delivers substantial ROI due to its AI-driven predictive capabilities, justifying the premium through advanced AI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogicMonitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

23rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th), Network Monitoring Software (24th), Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (18th), AIOps (13th)

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

63rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LogicMonitor is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LogicMonitor	2.1%
Loom Systems	0.3%
Other	97.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Maxwell Miya

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Ethical Trade SErvices Africa

Has improved service reliability and reduced downtime by providing full visibility into infrastructure

I wish the user interface would be customizable to allow users to create personal context-specific workspaces to hide irrelevant data, rather than trying to have a one-size-fits-all interface. This would go a long way, as would introducing a usage-based pricing model for data ingestion, per GB of metrics or logs alongside a device-based model similar to New Relic, which would be more attractive for cloud-native companies with dynamic infrastructure. While dynamic alerting is great, the overall alerting system can be complex to configure. If LogicMonitor looks into going beyond the topology-based correlation to include AI that can group related alerts from different parts of the stack into a single probable cause incident, that will significantly improve the system.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at FIS

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Another feature from the technical aspect, the back-end, is the ability to allow individual users or customers to have their own APIs. They're able to make changes using the plugins covered by LogicMonitor. That is a very powerful feature that is more attractive to our techno-savvy customers."

"LogicMonitor saves time in terms of its ability to proxy a connection through a device. For example, if you are troubleshooting a device, which you may want to connect to, you can proxy this connection through the platform. As a support resource, I don't need to use multiple platforms to connect to a device to further investigate the issue. It is all consolidated. From that perspective, it saves time because a resource now only needs to use one platform."

"LogicMonitor added AI technology to help understand what's normal and that has helped quite a bit, so that's the feature I found most valuable in the product. The product is also doing quite well with identifying devices and customizing a particular Cisco version or model number. LogicMonitor continues to be active in updating what is available to be monitored, and it's been very good with keeping those things current, so that's another valuable feature of the product."

"LogicMonitor helps us prevent potential downtime. It's pretty good. It generates low-level warnings that aren't necessarily preemptive but can still alert us to issues we should investigate. These warnings allow us to correlate data and identify areas where we should take action, even if the issues aren't critical."

"The plugins are easy to integrate, and LogicMonitor provides these add-ons for vendors like VMware. It becomes very easy to integrate them and take the data sources."

"It's the depth of data that it gathers that I find really useful because there's nothing worse, when you're trying to find information about something or dig deeper into something, than hitting the bottom of the information really quickly and not having enough information to work with. With LogicMonitor, there is a load of information to dig through. It's a really good solution for that."

"LogicMonitor has positively impacted our organization by especially improving service reliability and user experience, and the dynamic alerting and root cause analysis have helped us fix issues before they cause a full-blown outage or degrade performance for end users."

"The alerting would be number one in my book. The thresholds for getting alerts for different criteria are pretty well-thought-out. We don't get many false positives or negatives on the alerting side. If we do get an email alert or some similar alert, we know that it is something that has to be looked at."

More LogicMonitor pros

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

Cons

"One drawback of LogicMonitor is its licensing model, which requires an additional license for each module. For example, if you need to use Azure monitoring, you'll need an additional license on top of the base license."

"There is a lack of automation, especially in terms of remediating problems. The problem is seen and identified, but there is a need and a gap where LogicMonitor can help us automate the remediation of the problem."

"The ease of use with data source tuning could be improved. That can get hairy quickly. When I reach out for help, it's usually around a data source or event source configuration. That can get challenging."

"The dashboards can be improved. They are good, but there is a pain point. To show things to management, to explain pain points to other customers, to show them exactly where we can do better, the dashboarding could be better. Dashboards need to show the key things. Nobody is going to go into the ample details of Excel sheets or HTML."

"Automated remediation of issues has room for improvement. I don't know how best to handle it, but I know that they're kind of working on it. I know there are some resources that can do automated remediation. I would like them to improve this area so it could be completely hands-free, where it detects an issue, such as, if a CPU is running high. There are ways to do it even now, but it's a bit more involved."

"LogicMonitor has good features, but the ease of use is a little bit confusing. Additionally, we are looking for workflow automation, which is a little bit tricky for LogicMonitor."

"Role-based permissions could be better and updating modules could be smoother."

"LogicMonitor should improve its logging features. It can become expensive and should be cost-effective. It would be great to see prebuilt templates for alerting methods in LogicMonitor that are similar to the prebuilt dashboards. Currently, users have to build their alerting configurations."

More LogicMonitor cons

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They are expensive for the cloud."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate LogicMonitor four out of five."

"I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime."

"We've had customers who have reduced their costs by not having multiple platforms for monitoring. That said, especially with super-large environments, the cost model for LogicMonitor is the one area where we run into issues."

"We pay for the enterprise tech support."

"LogicMonitor is competitively priced at the same level as other vendors, like Datadog."

"The license is annual, and I'm not fully aware of what it costs. We have a through-cycle that we go through, and they've been generous with us going above our limit. They're not strict on it. At the end of the year, they got us to renew. We always add some cushion for what we expect. Also, if you need custom monitoring or design work, you can pay them for consulting services."

"The tool's pricing falls into the middle range."

More LogicMonitor pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What do you like most about LogicMonitor?

LogicMonitor helps us prevent potential downtime. It's pretty good. It generates low-level warnings that aren't necessarily preemptive but can still alert us to issues we should investigate. These ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogicMonitor?

The pricing can vary yearly or monthly, depending on the clients we're working with and their size and scale. For example, the pricing for a customer with ten thousand licenses versus a hundred lic...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpsRamp vs LogicMonitor

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs LogicMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Monitor vs LogicMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LogicMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogicMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

More LogicMonitor Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 37% of the time

Huawei eSight vs Loom Systems

Compared 33% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 31% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor

September 2025

Download LogicMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

September 2025

Download Loom Systems product report

Overview

LogicMonitor offers flexible IT monitoring with customizable dashboards and robust alerting capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party apps like ServiceNow and provides a single-pane view for diverse IT environments, aiding in proactive issue resolution and enhancing operational efficiency.

LogicMonitor stands out with its capability to monitor diverse infrastructures including Cisco Voice systems, data centers, and virtual environments. Supporting servers, storage, networking devices, and applications, it provides seamless integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure. Users leverage its scalability and flexibility, benefiting from dynamic thresholds, anomaly detection, and detailed visualization. All these features contribute to improved management of IT assets and streamlined operations. Users suggest improvements in mapping, reporting, and automation for remediation, desiring more customizations and an expansive application performance monitoring toolset.

What are LogicMonitor's key features?

Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization of monitoring views.
Robust Alerting: Offers advanced alert configurations.
API and Plugin Support: Ensures integration with apps like ServiceNow.
Dynamic Thresholds: Facilitates proactive issue resolution.
Anomaly Detection: Aids in identifying potential issues early.

What ROI should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by detailed visualizations and dashboards.
Scalability: Supports growing IT environments effortlessly.
Proactive Management: Facilitated by flexible alerting and monitoring.
Flexibility: Customization in monitoring diverse environments.

LogicMonitor is widely implemented across industries, providing monitoring for infrastructure in sectors like telecommunications, cloud computing, and managed services. Managed service providers particularly value its ability to track client environments, deliver proactive alerts, and generate comprehensive reports, while its integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure offers users centralized management and visibility into IT assets worldwide.

LogicMonitor

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Kayak, Zendesk, Ted Baker, Trulia, Sophos, iVision, TekLinks, Siemens

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems

September 2025

Free Report: LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogicMonitor vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.