CrossBrowserTesting and ReadyAPI cater to different testing needs, with CrossBrowserTesting excelling in browser compatibility and ReadyAPI focused on API testing. CrossBrowserTesting is preferred by cost-conscious buyers, while ReadyAPI is favored for its extensive feature set, justifying a higher investment.
Features: CrossBrowserTesting offers extensive browser and device testing, real device sessions, and automated testing across various browser versions. ReadyAPI provides comprehensive API testing capabilities, including API mocking, load testing, and detailed reporting.
Room for Improvement: CrossBrowserTesting could enhance its user interface, improve integration with other tools, and offer more customization options. ReadyAPI might benefit from a more intuitive learning curve, better integration with legacy systems, and enhanced support for non-API testing features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrossBrowserTesting has a straightforward deployment model, strong online resources, and quick customer support. ReadyAPI requires more initial setup but offers extensive documentation and dedicated support for enterprises.
Pricing and ROI: CrossBrowserTesting provides a cost-effective solution with flexible pricing plans. ReadyAPI, although with higher setup costs, offers strong ROI through its advanced features, making it worthy for companies needing robust API testing solutions.
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
