OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and ReadyAPI are competing products in the automated testing domain. ReadyAPI seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, which justifies its cost despite potentially higher initial expenditures.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab is known for its robust cross-platform capabilities with seamless integrations for mobile and web applications. OpenText provides strong compatibility with real devices connected to Mobile Center servers or personal computers, supporting both iOS and Android. It offers integration with HPE tools like ALM and UFT for enhanced testing. ReadyAPI, meanwhile, provides a full suite of testing tools, including powerful API testing capabilities with integration options for CI/CD through TestEngine. Its user-friendly dashboards and functionality make it a one-stop solution for comprehensive API testing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface to be more intuitive and may benefit from expanding its support for emulators in addition to real device testing. It can also improve its integration capabilities beyond HPE tools. ReadyAPI, on the other hand, could improve by refining its initial setup process to be more straightforward for those new to automated testing. It could also work on reducing complexity for users who lack extensive programming knowledge, and further broadening integration options with more open-source tools could help.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers versatile deployment models for easy integration into existing infrastructures, while providing comprehensive customer support during deployment. ReadyAPI offers straightforward deployment, noted for its streamlined installation process allowing organizations to start testing swiftly. Their responsive customer service is also a noted benefit among users.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText provides flexible pricing structures catering to different business sizes to ensure scalable ROI over time. ReadyAPI, though requiring a potentially higher initial investment, delivers significant ROI due to its extensive testing capabilities and time-saving automation features. The contrast lies in OpenText's scalable approach and ReadyAPI's upfront investment focus for long-term efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ReadyAPI | 1.6% |
| OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
