We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

CrossBrowserTesting Pros

Quality Assurance Specialist at SelectQuote
Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data.
View full review »
Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic
When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.
I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team.
View full review »
Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.
View full review »

CrossBrowserTesting Cons

Quality Assurance Specialist at SelectQuote
Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing.
View full review »
Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic
The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default.
View full review »
Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.