Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ReadyAPI pros and cons

Vendor: SmartBear

3.9 out of 5

37 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

ReadyAPI offers user-friendly features and integrates smoothly with tools like Jira, Postman, and CI/CD. It supports various APIs for functional, load, security, and performance testing, and offers robust scripting with Groovy. ReadyAPI enhances workflows with Docker and external data sources. However, performance and memory management require improvement, and initial setup is complex. Load testing can be less effective compared to alternatives, and integration with market tools needs enhancement, including NoSQL compatibility.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

ReadyAPI integrates smoothly with CI/CD tools and Jira, enhancing test management and automation processes.

ReadyAPI offers valuable scripting and connectivity to external data sources such as Excel and PDF files, supporting flexible test automation.

ReadyAPI supports a wide variety of APIs, making it suitable for testing various API types seamlessly.

ReadyAPI provides robust functionality for parameterization and environment customization, enabling efficient test execution across different environments.

ReadyAPI's integration with data tools and reporting features allow for comprehensive performance testing and easy data-driven testing.

CONS

ReadyAPI needs improvement in performance and memory management as it requires too many resources compared to other tools.

Integration with more big market tools and creating connectors for NoSQL databases could enhance ReadyAPI's functionality.

Load testing features could be enhanced, with reference to issues encountered versus competitors like HP LoadRunner.

Dynamic validation information and conversion tools for multiple file types would be beneficial enhancements for ReadyAPI.

Users report that version control, initial setup complexity, and licensing costs are areas where ReadyAPI could improve.

ReadyAPI Pros review quotes

Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Aug 26, 2019

The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.

Read full review

reviewer1054392

Testing Tool Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 27, 2019

The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client.

Read full review

MG

MonoranjanGorai

Senior Manager - Technology at Publicis Sapient

Feb 5, 2020

The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.

Read full review

Free Report: ReadyAPI Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Program Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Mar 30, 2020

It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.

Read full review

VP

Vallalarasu Pandiyan

Test Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 16, 2020

A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization.

Read full review

Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 29, 2020

The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.

Read full review

reviewer1393596

IT Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 18, 2020

When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing.

Read full review

reviewer1191753

Manager, Clinical Applications QA Testing at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 3, 2020

It's easy to learn how to use it.

Read full review

Development team leader / APPR at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 23, 2021

When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API.

Read full review

reviewer1490172

SDET at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 17, 2021

The most valuable feature is being able to run each version for test suites.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 37)

ReadyAPI Cons review quotes

Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Aug 26, 2019

I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.

Read full review

reviewer1054392

Testing Tool Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 27, 2019

If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful.

Read full review

MG

MonoranjanGorai

Senior Manager - Technology at Publicis Sapient

Feb 5, 2020

Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.

Read full review

Free Report: ReadyAPI Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Program Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Mar 30, 2020

The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.

Read full review

VP

Vallalarasu Pandiyan

Test Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 16, 2020

Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing.

Read full review

Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 29, 2020

The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved.

Read full review

reviewer1393596

IT Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 18, 2020

It doesn't have connectors to the NoSQL database. This is one of the things where they do not have a very solid strategy today. Other solutions have an in-built mechanism where I can directly and easily connect. An API is more around a user submitting a request on the frontend. It then hits the backend, puts the data, and responds back. If I am hitting MongoDB or NoSQL databases, I do not have ready-made inbuilt solutions in ReadyAPI that can easily help me in automating it faster. In our organization, we deal with NoSQL databases, and therefore, we need Groovy. We just cannot have a connector from ReadyAPI to do that. I have to write Groovy scripts. If you have themes that are predominantly using MongoDB, it leads to more maintenance and support activity because we are introducing more code into our commission. In terms of additional features, it can have cloud support. This is one of the things where we are getting into cloud support. We'll see how it works, but it is one of the doubts that we still have.

Read full review

reviewer1191753

Manager, Clinical Applications QA Testing at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 3, 2020

Version control does not work well.

Read full review

Development team leader / APPR at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 23, 2021

The initial setup could be less complex.

Read full review

reviewer1490172

SDET at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 17, 2021

To generate a test suite in API, I had to create a separate one each time because otherwise it was just override the test. Each API had to be added separately. I thought I could just have one and then create different methods, but I had to add each API separately to create the test for that. That is an area that could be improved.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 37)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Functional Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI

SmartBear TestComplete vs ReadyAPI

Tricentis NeoLoad vs ReadyAPI

BlazeMeter vs ReadyAPI

Sauce Labs vs ReadyAPI

Perfecto vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI

Selenium HQ vs ReadyAPI

Ranorex Studio vs ReadyAPI

Testim vs ReadyAPI

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ReadyAPI

ReadyAPI Test vs ReadyAPI

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Functional Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI

SmartBear TestComplete vs ReadyAPI

Tricentis NeoLoad vs ReadyAPI

BlazeMeter vs ReadyAPI

Sauce Labs vs ReadyAPI

Perfecto vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI

Selenium HQ vs ReadyAPI

Ranorex Studio vs ReadyAPI

Testim vs ReadyAPI

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ReadyAPI

ReadyAPI Test vs ReadyAPI

See all alternatives

Related questions

17

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

24

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

14

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

31

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

26

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

18

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

89

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

69

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

46

Specflow vs Selenium

35

What are the best performance testing tools?