LoadRunner Professional and ReadyAPI compete in the performance testing tools market. LoadRunner Professional appears to have an edge in protocol support and load testing scenarios, while ReadyAPI is strong in API testing and integration.
Features: LoadRunner Professional offers comprehensive protocol support for applications like Java, Citrix, and SAP. It excels in integrating external data sources for comprehensive performance analysis and boasts robust scripting tools supported by an extensive community. ReadyAPI stands out with its capabilities in API testing, offering a unified platform for functional, load, and security testing. It integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines and provides strong support for groovy scripting.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner's complexity and cost are challenges, along with limited real-time test adjustments. Enhancing support for modern protocols like GWT is needed. ReadyAPI would benefit from better integration with version control systems, improved load testing capabilities, and greater UI flexibility. Its scalability and support for newer technologies also need improvement, and its pricing could be more competitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both LoadRunner Professional and ReadyAPI offer on-premises deployment with cloud options. LoadRunner is preferred for its robustness in enterprise environments, while ReadyAPI is praised for easy CI/CD pipeline integration. LoadRunner's customer service has mixed reviews, whereas ReadyAPI offers good support but needs improvement in response time and handling complex queries.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Professional is considered expensive, providing strong ROI for extensive protocol support in enterprise settings despite a complex licensing model. ReadyAPI offers flexible pricing, allowing organizations to purchase only needed functionalities, making it cost-effective for API-focused testing despite being more expensive than some open-source tools.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.