OpenText LoadRunner Professional and ReadyAPI compete in performance testing tools category. LoadRunner Professional seems to have the upper hand with its extensive protocol support and capabilities in large-scale performance testing.
Features: OpenText LoadRunner Professional offers powerful scripting tools for creating complex scripts, extensive protocol support, and in-depth monitoring and analysis tools. It allows users to simulate multiple users and provides comprehensive performance testing capabilities. Meanwhile, ReadyAPI is known for its ease of use, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and versatile API testing capabilities, making it ideal for functional and load testing of APIs.
Room for Improvement: OpenText LoadRunner Professional is noted for its complexity, requiring skilled resources and often encountering integration and network monitoring challenges. It also has limited support for modern and mobile technologies and critiques its high cost. ReadyAPI could improve in integrating with cloud solutions, enhancing security testing capabilities, and refining its load testing features. Users find it resource-intensive and its version control lacking efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Professional offers on-premises and cloud deployment options but receives mixed reviews on customer service, with variations in support quality. However, it benefits from community support. ReadyAPI is straightforward to deploy, praised for its ease of use and seamless integration with on-premises and cloud environments. Its customer support, however, receives mixed feedback, particularly in response times and comprehensive solutions.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner Professional's pricing is high and dependent on user licenses and required features, recognized for delivering good ROI in large-scale scenarios. ReadyAPI offers more flexible pricing, allowing purchase of specific functions, considered affordable for API testing with a reasonable ROI. It lets users select add-ons as needed, making it cost-effective for enterprises looking for dedicated API testing tools.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
Overall, the installation was quite easy since OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is SaaS-based.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 13.7% |
ReadyAPI | 2.9% |
Other | 83.4% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 17 |
Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
Large Enterprise | 66 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 5 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 28 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.