Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

CrossBrowserTesting vs LambdaTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
2,739 views|1,878 comparisons
LambdaTest Logo
3,244 views|2,048 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest report (Updated: August 2022).
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.""Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pros →

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!""The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly.""The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily.""LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more.""Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours.""LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!""Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!""In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

More LambdaTest Pros →

Cons
"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing.""We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

More CrossBrowserTesting Cons →

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.""If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic.""You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only.""The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive.""The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues.""LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team.""Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use.""I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

More LambdaTest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
  • More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is an affordable product."
  • "The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."
  • "It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."
  • "LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."
  • "It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."
  • "It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."
  • "LambdaTest is paid per execution."
  • More LambdaTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data.
    Top Answer:SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together. If you find yourself utilizing other project management programs in addition to testing programs such as this, it is helpful to have programs… more »
    Top Answer:Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing. This is one of the few concerns our team has had while trying… more »
    Top Answer:The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID.
    Top Answer:It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy.
    Top Answer:I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes. Though the stability is good, cloud platforms are a bit slower. The platform provides good emulators and… more »
    Ranking
    21st
    Views
    2,739
    Comparisons
    1,878
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.5
    9th
    Views
    3,244
    Comparisons
    2,048
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    9.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

    • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
    • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

    LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

    **Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
    You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
    The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
    Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

    **LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
    Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
    You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

    **Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
    1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
    2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
    3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
    4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
    5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
    6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
    7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
    8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
    9. API For Continuous Testing.

    Offer
    Learn more about CrossBrowserTesting
    Learn more about LambdaTest
    Sample Customers
    St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
    Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company44%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest
    August 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: August 2022.
    633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. CrossBrowserTesting is rated 8.6, while LambdaTest is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Reliable, integrates well with other platforms, and is less costly than our previous solution". CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Tricentis Tosca, Bitbar, Sauce Labs and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, TestProject, Tricentis Tosca and Perfecto. See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest report.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.