OpenText Functional Testing and CrossBrowserTesting are leading products in software testing solutions, competing in automation and environment testing, respectively. CrossBrowserTesting holds an advantage over OpenText Functional Testing by offering more versatile testing options across multiple environments.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides robust automation capabilities, seamless integration with various tools, and efficient test scripting. CrossBrowserTesting offers extensive browser and device environment support, live testing, and the ability to execute tests across real devices, enhancing cross-platform compatibility.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could benefit from enhancing feature diversity and integration with more external systems. Its complexity presents a challenge for new users. CrossBrowserTesting could focus on improving its interface for script management and offering more detailed analytics for test results, while supporting more legacy systems would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing has a complex setup but offers reliable customer support to address deployment challenges. CrossBrowserTesting simplifies deployment with its web-based platform, providing an easier start for testing across environments. Both offer strong customer support, though CrossBrowserTesting’s model is more straightforward.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing requires a higher initial setup cost, justifying a long-term investment for complex automation needs. CrossBrowserTesting offers better upfront value with flexible pricing plans, enabling quick ROI and scalability in diverse testing environments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| CrossBrowserTesting | 0.9% |
| Other | 90.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
