Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Functional Testing pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.0 out of 5

98 reviews
87% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Functional Testing integrates seamlessly across platforms, supporting applications like Oracle and SAP. Its GUI testing, automation capabilities, and custom framework support enhance productivity, though it demands significant system resources, leading to slow performance. Licensing costs are high, and technical support is often delayed. Despite these challenges, it simplifies coding with diverse technology support, although it presents a learning curve for developers and stability issues during regression testing.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Functional Testing has exceptional compatibility with a wide range of products, tools, and technologies, making it versatile for various projects and environments.

Record and playback, along with descriptive programming, are highly valued features, offering ease of use and efficiency in automation.

The integration capabilities with both API and GUI components enhance the software's utility and flexibility.

The ability to automate different applications streamlines day-to-day activities and improves operational efficiency.

OpenText Functional Testing offers high stability and reliability, making it suitable for large enterprises and long-term use.

CONS

OpenText Functional Testing may experience slow performance and high memory usage, especially on virtual servers without sufficient RAM.

There are compatibility issues with certain UI controls, such as Telerik, and limitations in supported programming languages, currently restricted to VBScript.

Integration with CI/CD pipelines and other tools like Selenium needs improvement, and the AI features are limited to web applications, requiring advancements.

The licensing and cost structure of OpenText Functional Testing is considered expensive, leading to resistance from users and organizations.

Support and customer service are reported as inadequate, with delays in issue resolution and response times from technical support.

OpenText Functional Testing Pros review quotes

Test Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Feb 16, 2015

UFT provides Business Process Testing from within UFT, using the native UFT user interface.

Read full review

Automation Engineer at HealthNow

Jun 20, 2015

There's less manual testing time, so we are able to quickly resolve any IT issues.

Read full review

Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Sep 29, 2022

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Software Test Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Nov 15, 2015

To me, the most valuable features were the OR and code compiler (VB script) to call the framework.

Read full review

Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 16, 2015

I found all the features to be valuable.

Read full review

Senior Product Development Engineer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 19, 2015

The return on investment for any company buying this product license is 100 percent, as businesses with clients increase productivity when manual tasks becomes faster and efficient by automating them with this tool.

Read full review

Managing Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 27, 2015

If one is looking for a software testing tool for functional parameters with an automation approach, they can go for it without any more thinking and discussion.

Read full review

Senior Technical Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 29, 2015

The UFT tool can be such a huge boon to a testing organization that can commit to its use.

Read full review

Assistant System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 29, 2015

We have performed 3500 test case automations, and we are able to execute them in just five days, whereas if we were to do this manually, it would take 30 days.

Read full review

Analyst Programmer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 29, 2015

It's allowed us to perform functional testing (to verify a specific action or function of code) for each product update.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 54)

OpenText Functional Testing Cons review quotes

Test Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Feb 16, 2015

This tool is good for programming experts.

Read full review

Automation Engineer at HealthNow

Jun 20, 2015

It’s in the middle and not always 100% reliable.

Read full review

Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Sep 29, 2022

Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Software Test Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Nov 15, 2015

When I ran the script for two or three times sequentially, the tool hung and wouldn’t respond.

Read full review

Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 16, 2015

Having an Object Repository that is not stored but built through the run is the most difficult and time consuming task.

Read full review

Senior Product Development Engineer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 19, 2015

I would like to see them remove the shortcoming of working with .NET applications, as there is not much support provided for automating applications developed on .NET.

Read full review

Managing Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 27, 2015

It needs better compatibility with Chrome and Safari, which would lead to this being a better product.

Read full review

Senior Technical Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 29, 2015

Stability can be an issue, and the weaker the resources on the machine running UFT the more likely there will be problems.

Read full review

Assistant System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 29, 2015

Cross-browser testing feature should be improved.

Read full review

Analyst Programmer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 29, 2015

We would like to see smart identification (captures a unique object during testing) work more reliably.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 54)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Postman Enterprise vs OpenText Functional Testing

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs OpenText Functional Testing

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Postman Enterprise vs OpenText Functional Testing

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs OpenText Functional Testing

See all alternatives

Related questions

41

Can JIRA provide integration to SAP automation?

24

SAP GUI Testing Tool

20

Has any user tried using UFT 12.02 with Windows 10?

19

UFT 14 vs UFT 12.54

32

Can javascript be used as a scripting language for tests in QTP or is it strictly VB?

9

Can QTP calculate the number of pixels on a web page?

12

Which product supports Cross Browser Testing: UFT Developer or UFT One?

120

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

22

Is Oracle Application Testing Suite or Micro Focus UFT One better for automating Oracle Fusion Applications?

25

Which product do you prefer: Micro Focus UFT One or SmartBear TestComplete?