You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Cisco TelePresence vs Webex comparison

Cisco TelePresence and Webex are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco TelePresence is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Webex is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Cisco TelePresence holds a 3.0% mindshare in VM, compared to Webex’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco TelePresence users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Webex users who would recommend it.

Cisco TelePresence

Read 9 Cisco TelePresence reviews

643 Views
643 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Webex

Read 125 Webex reviews

1,966 Views
1,907 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cisco TelePresence

Webex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco TelePresence and Webex are products in the video conferencing market. Webex appears to have the upper hand due to its cloud-based flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco TelePresence provides high-definition video quality, an immersive communication experience, and secure network integration. Webex offers comprehensive collaboration tools, seamless integration with various applications, and device adaptability for digital meetings and collaborative projects.

Room for Improvement: Cisco TelePresence could enhance mobility options, reduce infrastructure dependency, and streamline integration with third-party platforms. Webex might benefit from improved user interface intuitiveness, more robust offline functionalities, and enhanced audio clarity in low-bandwidth scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco TelePresence requires significant infrastructure investment and on-site installation, suitable for businesses seeking permanent setups. Webex offers cloud-based deployment with minimal setup, making it ideal for rapid remote team implementation. Both offer responsive customer support, with Webex maximizing time efficiency through its deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence involves high upfront costs due to hardware needs but provides returns for businesses using its full capabilities. Webex presents a cost-effective entry with flexible subscription models, facilitating scalability and quicker deployment, yielding faster ROI for diverse enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 3.0%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 12.6%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Webex	12.6%
Cisco TelePresence	3.0%
Other	84.4%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

OSCAR DE LA PENA

Senior Solution Architect at Ricoh España, S.L.U.

One-click meeting access and seamless integration enhance video conferencing experience

Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow. The end user experiences delays when using WebRTC, sometimes taking one minute or more to receive a connection. This issue is mainly due to Cisco taking a long time to download and start the WebRTC client on their devices. Ensuring it is embedded in the device could help.

Read full review

Wajid Khattak

Procurement Officer at Emerging Systems

Easy to use, enables remote meetings, and saves time and money

We deployed the product in our headquarters and connected our four plants. It enables us to meet remotely. We use the tool for remote meetings. I work in the manufacturing sector The product is easy to use. We are very comfortable with it. The video call features are compatible with different…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The configuration is a valuable."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."

"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

More Cisco TelePresence pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I like Webex because it is easy to work with."

"The most valuable feature is that you can host presentations with a lot of attendees."

"I am completely satisfied with the tech support."

"Doing presentations on the solution is very good. There isn't much they could do to improve this aspect. It's excellent."

"Webex is a reliable solution and has good video quality."

"The implmentation of Webex is simple. It does not a lot of time."

"Webex is easy to use, even for people who are just learning it."

More Webex pros

Cons

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"The calling features can be improved."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"The tool is expensive."

"I would like the next release to be more user-friendly."

"It should be more integrated with third-party vendors."

"An opportunity they could benefit from would be a version that includes meeting transcription. I usually use a third-party product to do transcription."

"The GUI of Webex should be improved. The connectivity for putting people inside the meetings or entering meetings is to be improved."

"I would like to see more integration, with respect to some more unified communication activities."

"Greater visibility beyond infrastructure metrics would be beneficial. We could leverage insights into business performance indicators as well. I believe that incorporating more predictive capabilities into Webex for the next version would be beneficial."

"The user interface is not easy to use."

"There could be a feature available to record the meetings."

More Webex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Webex is very expensive."

"We paid for our Webex license as a bundle."

"You need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges of the product. You need to opt for a subscription-based licensing model for your organization. The product is a bit expensive."

"There is a subscription needed to use this solution and we pay approximately $5,000 per year."

"I use the free version, not the enterprise version. The only compelling reason to go for paid WebEx pay is if you're hosting large meetings."

"The cost is pretty high compared to the competitors."

"The price of the license for the solution could be less expensive."

"The charges attached to the subscriptions of the product are okay. There are no extra charges to be paid in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Webex pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Performing Arts

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	60

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?

It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?

Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities. Security i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Webex?

Webex improved our overall team collaboration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?

Webex is expensive. If it weren't that expensive, we would probably use it for all our telecommunication needs, not just for telemedicine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webex?

I would appreciate improvements in communication stability and performance. Sometimes we experience a poor communication stream, but I am uncertain whether it is due to the internet link or somethi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zoom Workplace Business vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 24% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 16% of the time

Skype for Business vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 12% of the time

LifeSize vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 11% of the time

More Cisco TelePresence Competitors

Skype for Business vs Webex

Compared 31% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs Webex

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Webex

Compared 15% of the time

Adobe Connect vs Webex

Compared 12% of the time

GoToMeeting vs Webex

Compared 2% of the time

More Webex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

August 2025

Download Cisco TelePresence product report

Buyer's Guide

Webex

August 2025

Download Webex product report

Also Known As

TelePresence

Cisco Spark

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

Cisco

Webex is designed to help companies improve communication and increase productivity with unlimited HD video meetings in shared meeting spaces.

Companies can use Webex, a Cisco product, to collaborate with peers, share documents and other information, create high-impact webinars and online events, and present dynamic online courses. It can be tailored to your exact company needs and can be fully integrated with mobile apps for iPhone, iPad, Android, and BlackBerry.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images

Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.