Azure Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Microsoft and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Kaseya is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

11,124 Views
4,338 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

617 Views
376 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Azure Monitor are competing products in the realm of IT monitoring solutions. Azure Monitor has an edge due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, making it particularly effective for organizations leveraging Microsoft's cloud ecosystem.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers strong network performance monitoring and service-level agreement management. It also provides customers with a clear view of their IT stack through detailed reports. Azure Monitor is valued for its cloud resource monitoring, advanced analytics, and automation tools. Its integration with Microsoft's infrastructure and powerful tools make it a top choice for cloud-based solutions.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse can enhance its customer dashboard capabilities and inter-provider troubleshooting features. It would also benefit from improving its service-level agreement transparency. Azure Monitor could simplify its initial learning curve and expand its existing visualization features. Additionally, further enhancing integration capabilities with non-Microsoft platforms can extend its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse is known for flexible deployment options and responsive support, ensuring a smooth setup process. On the other hand, Azure Monitor benefits from seamless integration within Microsoft's infrastructure but may require a more extensive understanding for optimal use.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse offers a cost-effective initial setup with scalable pricing, promoting value for investment. Azure Monitor involves potentially higher initial costs, but its integration within Azure's ecosystem and extensive feature set generally promise a higher ROI, particularly for businesses heavily utilizing Azure services.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (6th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

32nd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 5.0%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Monitor	5.0%
Kaseya Traverse	0.4%
Other	94.6%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."

"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."

"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."

"It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale."

"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."

"The features that are most valuable are the alerting function and also the logging functionality to analyze certain issues using log analytics"

"The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform."

More Azure Monitor pros

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"No improvements are needed from my perspective."

"We cannot use AI services with the solution."

"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."

"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."

"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."

"Integration with third-party tools from other vendors than Azure is more time-consuming"

"Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?)."

"Using Azure Monitor and Azure Arc separately to monitor different environments can be complicated."

More Azure Monitor cons

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a pay-as-you-go model. I find it very cost-effective."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."

"Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."

"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."

"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

26%

Wholesaler/Distributor

10%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components. Azure Monitor is one thing, but within Azure Monitor, you need to bring Log Analyti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 61% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 39% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

October 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.