Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Microsoft and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Kaseya is ranked #37 with an average rating of 6.3. Microsoft holds a 6.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.
Azure Monitor
Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews
  • 5,343 Views
  • 2,687 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 339 Views
  • 4 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Azure Monitor are competing products in the realm of IT monitoring solutions. Azure Monitor has an edge due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, making it particularly effective for organizations leveraging Microsoft's cloud ecosystem.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers strong network performance monitoring and service-level agreement management. It also provides customers with a clear view of their IT stack through detailed reports. Azure Monitor is valued for its cloud resource monitoring, advanced analytics, and automation tools. Its integration with Microsoft's infrastructure and powerful tools make it a top choice for cloud-based solutions.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse can enhance its customer dashboard capabilities and inter-provider troubleshooting features. It would also benefit from improving its service-level agreement transparency. Azure Monitor could simplify its initial learning curve and expand its existing visualization features. Additionally, further enhancing integration capabilities with non-Microsoft platforms can extend its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse is known for flexible deployment options and responsive support, ensuring a smooth setup process. On the other hand, Azure Monitor benefits from seamless integration within Microsoft's infrastructure but may require a more extensive understanding for optimal use.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse offers a cost-effective initial setup with scalable pricing, promoting value for investment. Azure Monitor involves potentially higher initial costs, but its integration within Azure's ecosystem and extensive feature set generally promise a higher ROI, particularly for businesses heavily utilizing Azure services.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)
Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
37th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (69th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.2%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed
The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.
Read full review
AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Azure Monitor is very stable."
"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."
"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."
"I find the query language in this tool very beneficial, as it allows me to customize some dashboards and create alerts according to my thresholds and metrics."
"Technical support is helpful."
"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"It is a robust, stable product."
More Azure Monitor pros
"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in stability."
"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."
"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."
"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."
"It might not have all of the capabilities we will need."
"The biggest one is probably just the user interface. There could be more advanced logging at the database level. They can also improve their query builder to allow you to search for things better, but I last used it about a year ago. They might have already changed a ton of things in the newer versions."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?)."
More Azure Monitor cons
"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."
"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."
"Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."
"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."
"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."
"It is a pay-as-you-go model. I find it very cost-effective."
"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"
More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Non Profit
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor Logo
Datadog vs Azure Monitor
Compared 22% of the time
Sentry vs Azure Monitor Logo
Sentry vs Azure Monitor
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor Logo
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Azure Monitor Logo
Grafana vs Azure Monitor
Compared 11% of the time
New Relic vs Azure Monitor Logo
New Relic vs Azure Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More Azure Monitor Competitors
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 44% of the time
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 21% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 18% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 18% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor
June 2025
Azure Monitor reportDownload Azure Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
 

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya
 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
June 2025
Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.