Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Microsoft and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Kaseya is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 5.6% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.
Azure Monitor
Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews
  • 12,653 Views
  • 4,808 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 619 Views
  • 378 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Azure Monitor are competing products in the realm of IT monitoring solutions. Azure Monitor has an edge due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, making it particularly effective for organizations leveraging Microsoft's cloud ecosystem.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers strong network performance monitoring and service-level agreement management. It also provides customers with a clear view of their IT stack through detailed reports. Azure Monitor is valued for its cloud resource monitoring, advanced analytics, and automation tools. Its integration with Microsoft's infrastructure and powerful tools make it a top choice for cloud-based solutions.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse can enhance its customer dashboard capabilities and inter-provider troubleshooting features. It would also benefit from improving its service-level agreement transparency. Azure Monitor could simplify its initial learning curve and expand its existing visualization features. Additionally, further enhancing integration capabilities with non-Microsoft platforms can extend its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse is known for flexible deployment options and responsive support, ensuring a smooth setup process. On the other hand, Azure Monitor benefits from seamless integration within Microsoft's infrastructure but may require a more extensive understanding for optimal use.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse offers a cost-effective initial setup with scalable pricing, promoting value for investment. Azure Monitor involves potentially higher initial costs, but its integration within Azure's ecosystem and extensive feature set generally promise a higher ROI, particularly for businesses heavily utilizing Azure services.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)
Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
32nd
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (56th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 5.6%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed
The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.
Read full review
AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."
"The features that are most valuable are the alerting function and also the logging functionality to analyze certain issues using log analytics"
"Among the valuable features of this solution, Application Insights stands out as one of the most significant. It provides insights into application performance and helps identify issues and bottlenecks."
"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."
"It allows you to set thresholds on the metrics and receive alerts."
"I can conclude reports for the monthly, weekly, and peak time of the resources."
"It has good troubleshooting features."
More Azure Monitor pros
"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
 

Cons

"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."
"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."
"It might not have all of the capabilities we will need."
"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."
"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."
"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."
"No improvements are needed from my perspective."
"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."
More Azure Monitor cons
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."
"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."
"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
"It is a pay-as-you-go model. I find it very cost-effective."
"The solution is expensive, but it is worth the price."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Since we are using the basic set, it is more cost-effective compared to other third-party APM solutions."
"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."
More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
25%
Non Profit
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor Logo
Datadog vs Azure Monitor
Compared 21% of the time
Sentry vs Azure Monitor Logo
Sentry vs Azure Monitor
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor Logo
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Azure Monitor Logo
Grafana vs Azure Monitor
Compared 10% of the time
New Relic vs Azure Monitor Logo
New Relic vs Azure Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More Azure Monitor Competitors
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 66% of the time
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 34% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor
August 2025
Azure Monitor reportDownload Azure Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
August 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
 

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya
 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
July 2025
Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Monitor vs. Kaseya Traverse report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.