Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (8th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a security standpoint, it is just seeing pockets as well. Visibility is very key for us."

"The artifacts available in the tool provide better information for analyzing network traffic. It enables a holistic view of network traffic and general packet analysis. It's easy to identify anomalies without the use of signatures. The way in which we implemented Stealthwatch Cloud has enabled my team to analyze traffic behind proxies."

"The most valuable features are encrypted threat analysis and the ability to run jobs on entire flows."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow. The beginning of any security investigation starts with NetFlow data."

"This solution is doing everything that we want, and my only complaint is in regards to the quirks during installation."

"The network visibility feature opens up a whole new pane of glass that didn't exist before, so when you talk about being able to look into your network and understand what's there for security events, impostering, and everything that Stealthwatch can bring to the table, there's nothing else that a typical customer's going to have installed today that will give them any of that information."

"The best feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is its reliability, which I find to be the one that gets used the most."

"AI provides suggested common lines and protection features that help safeguard networks from various threats or unwanted situations."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"In terms of most valuable features, we are happy with everything so far, and maybe in a year's time I'll have a different opinion on what can change, what can be better, but for now it's the perfect solution."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"We had some trouble with the installation as we migrated from our previous solution."

"One area that could be improved in SNA is the integration with Cisco ISE for user and session details, which currently requires additional setup."

"It's a good solid solution but integration with Network Access Control products with Cisco ISE would be good."

"Complexity on integration is not so straightforward and you really need an expert to help build it out."

"It would be better to let people know, up front, that is doesn't give you nice, clear information, as seen in the demos, without Cisco ISE installed."

"We haven't seen ROI."

"The ability to be natively integrated into Port Aggregator would be beneficial because it would reduce just one more component that's needed in order to have that type of view."

"This is a good solution, but Java is still in the SMC, the Firepower integration is not really there, and I would really appreciate people being told about the necessity of ISE beforehand."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully assess what it has."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"The support for the solution needs some improvement. In my experience, the response time to answer a query is slow."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000."

"The pricing for this solution is good."

"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The tool is not cheaply priced."

"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it."

"The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000."

"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 5% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

AcuVigill Dashboard vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Kaseya Traverse

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kaseya Traverse